510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Xtender Film Processor, Sprint Film Processor Model Xtender Model Sprint

K111167510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 18, 2011114-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1900

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Velopex International, Inc. · IXW Processor, Radiographic-Film, Automatic

Cleared on Aug 18, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K093503 (Velopex International, Inc., 2010) and 1 other predicate after a 114-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1987.

Decided
Aug 18, 2011
Review
114 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IXW
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K874118 (1987). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK874118 Model 410 Dental X-Ray Film ProcessorsDent-X Co. · 1987
  2. 1 generation backK093503 Intrax Film ProcessorVelopex International, Inc. · 2010
  3. This deviceK111167 Xtender Film Processor, Sprint Film Processor Model Xtender Model…Velopex International, Inc. · 2011
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K874118Model 410 Dental X-Ray Film ProcessorsDent-X Co.1987—
−1K093503Intrax Film ProcessorVelopex International, Inc.2010—
0 (this device)K111167Xtender Film Processor, Sprint Film Processor Model Xtender Model SprintVelopex International, Inc.2011—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K111167, 1987–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IXW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (6)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K093503Intrax Film Processor
Summary page 1
…ic-Film, Automatic > Device Class 2 > Regulation Number; 892.1900 Legally marketed device to which we are claiming equivalence: > Velopex IntraX Film Processor #K093503 > Air Techniques Inc. (Registered Establishment # 2428225) A/T 2000 Automatic Film Processor > Dent-X Co., Model 41…
Velopex International, Inc.2010—
*K874118Model 410 Dental X-Ray Film Processors
Summary page 1
…#K093503 > Air Techniques Inc. (Registered Establishment # 2428225) A/T 2000 Automatic Film Processor > Dent-X Co., Model 410 Dental X-Ray Film Processor #K874118 > Air Techniques Inc. (Registered Establishment##2428225) Pen-Pro Film Processor > Air Techniques Inc. (Registered…
Dent-X Co.1987—
*—Air Techniques Inc. A/T 2000 Automatic Film Processor
Named without a submission number
—
*—Air Techniques Inc. Pen-Pro Film Processor
Named without a submission number
—
*—Air Techniques Inc. All-Pro 2010 Film Processor
Named without a submission number
—
*—Air Techniques Inc. All-Pro 100 Plus Film Processor
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 24 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 22.2 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All IXW devices

IXW Processor, Radiographic-Film, Automatic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IXW

1in 2011

2009: 12010: 12011: 1
2007high 1 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IXW

Too few IXW 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · IXW

No recall names IXW since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · IXW

2in 2018

2008: 12009: 22014: 22015: 22016: 12017: 12018: 2
2007high 2 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IXW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20091—02
20101—00
20111—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—02
20150—02
20160—01
20170—01
20180—02
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K111167: Xtender Film Processor, Sprint Film Processor Model Xtender Model Sprint.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K111167

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026