510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Accessnet, Accessmed, Accessrad, Medview

K091631510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 18, 2010288-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Aspyra, Inc. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Mar 18, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K973805 (Storcomm, Inc., 1998) and 5 other predicates after a 288-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1994.

Decided
Mar 18, 2010
Review
288 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
6

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K942120 (1994). 27 ancestors in all, the oldest K803130 (1981). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2005: 2 other ancestors2004: 2 other ancestors2001: 2 other ancestors1998: 1 other ancestor2007: 1 other ancestor2000: 3 other ancestors1997: 2 other ancestors1993: 2 other ancestors2003: 2 other ancestors1995: 2 other ancestors1988: 1 other ancestor1981: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestorK942120 · Advantage Windows Diagnostic X-Ray Workstation · GE Medical Systems · 1994K013630 · Isite Radiology · Stentor, Inc. · 2001K031311 · Integradweb by Dynamic Imaging, Inc. · Dynamic Imaging, Inc. · 2003K042313 · Integradweb MPR/Mip · Dynamic Imaging, Inc. · 2004K082318 · Centricity Pacs IW · Ge Healthcare Dynamic Imaging Solutions · 2008 · recalled1980198519901995200020052010
  1. Root · 5 generations backK942120 Advantage Windows Diagnostic X-Ray WorkstationGE Medical Systems · 1994
  2. 4 generations backK013630 Isite RadiologyStentor, Inc. · 2001
  3. 3 generations backK031311 Integradweb by Dynamic Imaging, Inc.Dynamic Imaging, Inc. · 2003
  4. 2 generations backK042313 Integradweb MPR/MipDynamic Imaging, Inc. · 2004
  5. 1 generation backK082318 Centricity Pacs IWGe Healthcare Dynamic Imaging Solutions · 2008 · Recalled
  6. This deviceK091631 Accessnet, Accessmed, Accessrad, MedviewAspyra, Inc. · 2010
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K942120Advantage Windows Diagnostic X-Ray WorkstationGE Medical Systems1994—
−4K013630Isite RadiologyStentor, Inc.2001—
−3K031311Integradweb by Dynamic Imaging, Inc.Dynamic Imaging, Inc.2003—
−2K042313Integradweb MPR/MipDynamic Imaging, Inc.2004—
−1K082318Centricity Pacs IWGe Healthcare Dynamic Imaging Solutions20087
0 (this device)K091631Accessnet, Accessmed, Accessrad, MedviewAspyra, Inc.2010—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198110
198810
199320
199520
199610
199720
199810
200030
200120
200320
200420
200520
200710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K091631, 1994–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (6)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K973805Imageaccess System
Summary page 2
…The As~yra PACS is substantially equivalent in operating principle, technology, overall design, function, and intended use to ImageACCESS PACS as described in K973805. Im- age stitching is substantially equivalent in operating principle, technology, overall design, function, and inte…
Storcomm, Inc.1998—
*K003438Smart Rad
Summary page 2
…ibed in K973805. Im- age stitching is substantially equivalent in operating principle, technology, overall design, function, and intended use to CMT SmartRAD[K003438]and Fuji Flashllp [K013218] [K041990], and Mammography functionality is substantially equivalent in operating princip…
Cmt Medical Technologies, Ltd.2001—
*K013218Fuji Speed Suite, Fuji Speed Sute Phase II
Summary page 2
…age stitching is substantially equivalent in operating principle, technology, overall design, function, and intended use to CMT SmartRAD[K003438]and Fuji Flashllp [K013218] [K041990], and Mammography functionality is substantially equivalent in operating principle, technology, overall des…
Fujifilm Medical System U.S.A., Inc.20011
*K041990Fuji Medical CR Console, Model Flash Iip
Summary page 2
…substantially equivalent in operating principle, technology, overall design, function, and intended use to CMT SmartRAD[K003438]and Fuji Flashllp [K013218] [K041990], and Mammography functionality is substantially equivalent in operating principle, technology, overall design, function, a…
Fujifilm Medical System U.S.A., Inc.2004—
*K051553Fuji Synapse Workstation Software
Summary page 2
…and Mammography functionality is substantially equivalent in operating principle, technology, overall design, function, and intended use to the Fuji Synapse [K051553] and GE Centricity [K082318]. AD2…
Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A, Inc.20051
*K082318Centricity Pacs IW
Summary page 2
…y is substantially equivalent in operating principle, technology, overall design, function, and intended use to the Fuji Synapse [K051553] and GE Centricity [K082318]. AD2- 107 4 r~DE…
Ge Healthcare Dynamic Imaging Solutions20087

Also cleared against K973805: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.6 years on median.
  • 10 of the 27 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K973805.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

The Aspyra AccessNET PACS is a software device designed to operate on specified off-the-shelf hardware and virtual environments. The device is intended to receive digital images and data from various sources including CT scanners, MR scanners, Nuclear Medicine (NM), PET, ultrasound systems, Computed & Direct radiographic devices (CR, DR), secondary capture devices, scanners, imaging gateways, etc. as well as other DICOM compliant modalities. Images and…

Read the full statement (216 words)

The Aspyra AccessNET PACS is a software device designed to operate on specified off-the-shelf hardware and virtual environments. The device is intended to receive digital images and data from various sources including CT scanners, MR scanners, Nuclear Medicine (NM), PET, ultrasound systems, Computed & Direct radiographic devices (CR, DR), secondary capture devices, scanners, imaging gateways, etc. as well as other DICOM compliant modalities. Images and data can be captured, stored, communicated, processed, printed, and displayed within the system and or across computer networks at distributed locations.

Display and processing functions while viewing images include, but are not limited to, adjustment of window and level, rotatidn, zoom, measurement of anatomical structures, image stitching, image stacking, filtration of color images (e.g. removal of red channel), annotation and measurement of regions of interest, inversion, rotation, flips, Multi-Planar Reformation (MPR), and Maximum intensity projection (MIP). In addition, users can dictate, edit, sign, and print reports.

The Aspyra. AccessNET PACS is indicated for the primary review of "For Presentation" DICOM mamnmographic images. Lossy compressed mammographic images and digitized film screen images must not be used for primary image interpretations. Mammographic images for primary image interpretations may only be interpreted using an FDA approved monitor that offers at least 5 MP resolution and meets other technical specifications reviewed and accepted by FDA.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K091631: Accessnet, Accessmed, Accessrad, Medview.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091631

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026