510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2025

CX50 Version 2.0 Diagnostic Ultrasound System and Transducers

K091804510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 17, 200929-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1570Recalls 7

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Philips Ultrasound, Inc. · ITX Transducer, Ultrasonic, Diagnostic

Cleared on Jul 17, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K030455 (Philips Ultrasound, Inc., 2003) after a 29-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1997. 57 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 7 times.

Decided
Jul 17, 2009
Review
29 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ITX
Recalls
7
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K961459 (1997). 4 ancestors in all. 57 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2000: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor2011: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2015: 5 descendants cleared2016: 5 descendants cleared2019: 2 descendants cleared2020: 3 descendants cleared2017: 8 descendants cleared2025: 10 descendants cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2022: 3 descendants cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2024: 5 descendants cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2026: 8 descendants clearedReference device: K041949 · Allura Xper FD10 · Philips Medical Systems North America Co. · 2004 · recalledK961459 · Level 10 Hdi · Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. · 1997K030455 · Boris Platform Diagnostic Ultrasound System · Philips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2003 · recalled1995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 3 descendants3 generations forward: 3 descendants4 generations forward: 9 descendants5 generations forward: 6 descendants6 generations forward: 4 descendants7 generations forward: 5 descendants8 generations forward: 13 descendants9 generations forward: 6 descendants10 generations forward: 6 descendants11 generations forward: 1 descendant K030455 · Boris Platform Diagnostic Ultrasound System · Philips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2003 · recalledK961459 · Level 10 Hdi · Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. · 19970+5+10
  1. Root · 2 generations backK961459 Level 10 HdiAdvanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. · 1997
  2. 1 generation backK030455 Boris Platform Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK091804 CX50 Version 2.0 Diagnostic Ultrasound System and TransducersPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2009
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 56 of its ownK111513 CX50 Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2011 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 53 of its ownK123754 CX50 3.0 Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2012 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 27 of its ownK162329 CX50 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, Sparq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Health Care · 2016 · Recalled
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 19 of its ownK142710 S9 Portable Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound SystemSonoscape Company Limited · 2015
  8. Descendant · 4 generations on · 18 of its ownK201012 EPIQ Diagnostic Ultrasound System Series, Affiniti Diagnostic…Philips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2020 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 57 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 12012: 12014: 22015: 52016: 52017: 82018: 22019: 22020: 32021: 12022: 32023: 12024: 52025: 102026: 8
2011high 10 (2025) · low 0 (2013)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 57 · See all
  • K111513CX50 Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly56descendants
  • K123754CX50 3.0 Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2012 · 2 generations on53descendants
  • K162329CX50 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, Sparq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Health Care · 2016 · 3 generations on27descendants
  • K142710S9 Portable Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound SystemSonoscape Company Limited · 2015 · 3 generations on19descendants
  • K201012EPIQ Diagnostic Ultrasound System Series, Affiniti Diagnostic Ultrasound System Series…Philips Ultrasound, Inc. · 2020 · 4 generations on18descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K961459Level 10 HdiAdvanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.1997—
−1K030455Boris Platform Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc.200331
0 (this device)K091804CX50 Version 2.0 Diagnostic Ultrasound System and TransducersPhilips Ultrasound, Inc.2009—
+1K111513CX50 Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc.201110
+2K123754CX50 3.0 Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc.201222
+3K162329CX50 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, Sparq Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Health Care20163
+3K142710S9 Portable Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound SystemSonoscape Company Limited2015—
+4K201012EPIQ Diagnostic Ultrasound System Series, Affiniti Diagnostic Ultrasound…Philips Ultrasound, Inc.20205

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200010

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201210
201420
201550
201650
201780
201820
201920
202030
202110
202230
202310
202450
2025100
202680
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K091804, 1997–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ITX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ITX device

  1. #1 K260114 Align® Cover and Pad Guidance Toolscore 13.6 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K030455Boris Platform Diagnostic Ultrasound System
Summary page 1
…the CX50 system. These expanded intended uses are all within the cleared intended uses for the predicate device, Philips iU22 diagnostic ultrasound s yste leared in K030455), to which CX50 2.0 is subst~antqil y eq et CX50 2.0 is intended for diagnostic ultrasound imaging and fluid flow analysis.…
Philips Ultrasound, Inc.200331
†K041949Allura Xper FD10Philips Medical Systems North America Co.200448

Also cleared against K030455: 5 other devices →

What descends from it? (57)

See all 57

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K111513CX50 Diagnostic Ultrasound SystemPhilips Ultrasound, Inc.201156

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 3, 2025Class IIIZ-2362-2025Device DesignTo provide clarification and labelling to define the useful life of ultrasound transducers in the field.
Jul 3, 2025Class IIIZ-2368-2025Device DesignTo provide clarification and labelling to define the useful life of ultrasound transducers in the field.
Jul 3, 2025Class IIIZ-2352-2025Device DesignTo provide clarification and labelling to define the useful life of ultrasound transducers in the field.
Jul 3, 2025Class IIIZ-2372-2025Device DesignTo provide clarification and labelling to define the useful life of ultrasound transducers in the field.
May 28, 2025Class IIZ-2054-2025Process controlUltrasound transducer devices were refurbished beyond their useful life.
May 28, 2025Class IIZ-2058-2025Process controlUltrasound transducer devices were refurbished beyond their useful life.
May 28, 2025Class IIZ-2049-2025Process controlUltrasound transducer devices were refurbished beyond their useful life.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 12 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.3 years on median.
  • 1 of the 4 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K111513 (Philips Ultrasound, Inc., 2011) has gone furthest, with 56 descendants of its own.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K030455.

How does its category compare?

All ITX devices

ITX Transducer, Ultrasonic, Diagnostic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ITX

4in 2025

2007: 102008: 122009: 172010: 102011: 102012: 72013: 32014: 42015: 12016: 42017: 62018: 22019: 12020: 32021: 32022: 22023: 62024: 32025: 42026 (partial year): 6
2007high 17 (2009) · low 1 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ITX

126in 2025

2007: 26 days median2008: 73 days median2009: 28 days median2010: 42 days median2011: 16 days median2012: 25 days median2013: 105 days median2014: 41 days median2016: 151 days median2017: 110 days median2020: 120 days median2021: 139 days median2023: 213 days median2024: 81 days median2025: 126 days median2026 (partial year): 158 days median
2007high 213 (2023) · low 16 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ITX

2in 2025

2008: 42009: 42010: 42011: 12012: 12014: 12015: 52017: 12018: 152020: 32021: 10, 10 Class I2022: 62023: 12024: 12025: 2
2007high 15 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (10 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ITX

571in 2025

2007: 162008: 392009: 232010: 302011: 342012: 292013: 382014: 432015: 1832016: 2692017: 4122018: 1302019: 1192020: 1162021: 1462022: 872023: 1382024: 9882025: 571
2007high 988 (2024) · low 16 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ITX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071026016
20081273439
20091728423
20101042430
20111016134
2012725129
20133105038
2014441143
20151—5183
201641510269
201761101412
20182—15130
20191—0119
202031203116
2021313910 (10)146
20222—687
202362131138
20243811988
202541262571
202661580—

What is it indicated for?

The CX50 2.0 Diagnostic Ultrasound System is intended for diagnostic ultrasound imaging in B (or 2-D), M-mode (including Anatomical M-mode), Pulse Wave Doppler, Continuous Wave Doppler, Color Doppler, Tissue Doppler Imaging and Harmonics (Tissue and Contrast) modes. It is indicated for diagnostic ultrasound imaging and fluid flow analysis in the following clinical applications: Cardiac (adult), Ophthalmic, Fetal, Abdominal, Pediatric, Musculoskeletal…

Read the full statement (94 words)

The CX50 2.0 Diagnostic Ultrasound System is intended for diagnostic ultrasound imaging in B (or 2-D), M-mode (including Anatomical M-mode), Pulse Wave Doppler, Continuous Wave Doppler, Color Doppler, Tissue Doppler Imaging and Harmonics (Tissue and Contrast) modes. It is indicated for diagnostic ultrasound imaging and fluid flow analysis in the following clinical applications: Cardiac (adult), Ophthalmic, Fetal, Abdominal, Pediatric, Musculoskeletal, Peripheral Vessel, Small Organ, Trans-vaginal, Adult Cephalic, and Gynecological.

The clinical environments where the CX50 Diagnostic Ultrasound System can be used include point-of-care areas in offices, clinical and hospital settings for diagnosis of patients.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K091804: CX50 Version 2.0 Diagnostic Ultrasound System and Transducers.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091804

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026