510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Atlas Intervertebral Body Cage

K092774510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 2, 2010146-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Spinal Edge, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Feb 2, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K060916 (Spinal Edge, LLC, 2006) and 2 other predicates after a 146-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1984.

Decided
Feb 2, 2010
Review
146 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K841189 (1984). 19 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 7 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 6 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 5 generations backK020887 Ebi Ais Spine SystemEbi, L.P. · 2002
  4. 4 generations backK040482 Ebi Esl Spine Spacer SystemEbi, L.P. · 2004
  5. 3 generations backK042268 Ebi Cas Spine Spacer SystemEbi, L.P. · 2004
  6. 2 generations backK052384 Lanx VBR SystemLanx, LLC · 2005
  7. 1 generation backK083815 Lanx Fusion SystemLanx, Inc. · 2009
  8. This deviceK092774 Atlas Intervertebral Body CageSpinal Edge, LLC · 2010
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−7K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−6K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−5K020887Ebi Ais Spine SystemEbi, L.P.2002—
−4K040482Ebi Esl Spine Spacer SystemEbi, L.P.2004—
−3K042268Ebi Cas Spine Spacer SystemEbi, L.P.2004—
−2K052384Lanx VBR SystemLanx, LLC2005—
−1K083815Lanx Fusion SystemLanx, Inc.2009—
0 (this device)K092774Atlas Intervertebral Body CageSpinal Edge, LLC2010—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200010
200130
200210
200320
200420
200610
200820
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K092774, 1984–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K060916Atlas Spinal Cage, Models SC-150-007, 009, 011, 013, 015, 017.
Summary page 1
…and (21 CFR 888.3080), Class 1I Product Code MAX 3. Predicate Devices K060916 - Atlas Spinal Cage K083815 - Lanx Fusion System K990148 - Stackable Cage System 4. Device…
Spinal Edge, LLC2006—
*K083815Lanx Fusion System
Summary page 1
…080), Class 1I Product Code MAX 3. Predicate Devices K060916 - Atlas Spinal Cage K083815 - Lanx Fusion System K990148 - Stackable Cage System 4. Device Description This submission is…
Lanx, Inc.2009—
*K990148Stackable Cage System
Summary page 1
…MAX 3. Predicate Devices K060916 - Atlas Spinal Cage K083815 - Lanx Fusion System K990148 - Stackable Cage System 4. Device Description This submission is intended to seek clearance for a product…
Depuy Motech Acromed1999—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 26 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.9 years on median.
  • 1 of the 19 ancestors has a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

When used as vertebral body replacement, the ATLAS -Intervertebral Body Cage is indicated for use in the thoracolumbar spine (T I-L5) to replace a collapsed, damaged or unstable vertebral body due to tumor or trauma. The ATLAS Intervertebral Body Cage is intended to be used. with supplemental fixation systems that have been labeled for use in the thoracic and/or lumbar spine (i.e. posterior pedicle screw and rod systems, anterior plate systems, and…

Read the full statement (235 words)

When used as vertebral body replacement, the ATLAS -Intervertebral Body Cage is indicated for use in the thoracolumbar spine (T I-L5) to replace a collapsed, damaged or unstable vertebral body due to tumor or trauma. The ATLAS Intervertebral Body Cage is intended to be used. with supplemental fixation systems that have been labeled for use in the thoracic and/or lumbar spine (i.e. posterior pedicle screw and rod systems, anterior plate systems, and anterior screw and rod systems) the interior spacer may be packed with bone graftingtmaterial. The ATLAS Intervertebral Body Cage has been designed to provide anterior column support even in the absence of fusion for a prolonged period of time.

When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device the ATLAS Intervertebral Body Cage is intended for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature individuals with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous spinal levels from L2 to SI. DDD is defined and discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have six months of non-operative treatment. These DDD patients may have had previous non-fusion spinal surgery at the involved spinal level(s). The ATLAS Intervertebral Body Cage is implanted via an anterior or posterior approach and is combined with supplemental fixation.

For either intended use, the ATLAS Intervertebral Body Cage must be used with supplemental internal fixation.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K092774: Atlas Intervertebral Body Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K092774

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026