510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Zimmer Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System

K093561510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 28, 2010161-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Zimmer, Inc. · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Apr 28, 2010 as substantially equivalent to K021891 (Zimmer, Inc., 2002) and 1 other predicate after a 161-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1997.

Decided
Apr 28, 2010
Review
161 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to P960047 (1997). 8 ancestors in all, the oldest K934765 (1994). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backP960047 Osteonics Constrained Acetabular InsertHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 1997
  2. 3 generations backK021661 Ringloc Constrained LinersBiomet Orthopedics, Inc. · 2002
  3. 2 generations backK030923 Epsilon Durasul Constrained Acetabular LinerCenterpulse Orthopedics, Inc. · 2003
  4. 1 generation backK071718 Trilogy Longevity Constrained LinerZimmer, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled
  5. This deviceK093561 Zimmer Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular SystemZimmer, Inc. · 2010
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4P960047Osteonics Constrained Acetabular InsertHowmedica Osteonics Corp.1997—
−3K021661Ringloc Constrained LinersBiomet Orthopedics, Inc.2002—
−2K030923Epsilon Durasul Constrained Acetabular LinerCenterpulse Orthopedics, Inc.2003—
−1K071718Trilogy Longevity Constrained LinerZimmer, Inc.20071
0 (this device)K093561Zimmer Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular SystemZimmer, Inc.2010—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
199710
200010
200210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K093561, 1997–2010Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.3 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K021891Zimmer Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System
Summary page 2
…emented prosthesis Predicate Device: Zimmer TrabecularMetalTM Modular Acetabular System, manufactured by Zimmer, Inc. K021891, cleared September 05, 2002. Trilogy®Longevity® Constrained…
Zimmer, Inc.20023
*K071718Trilogy Longevity Constrained Liner
Summary page 2
…cleared September 05, 2002. Trilogy®Longevity® Constrained Liner, manufactured by Zimmer, Inx. K071718, cleared July 13, 2007. Device Description: The Zimmer TrabecularMetal Modular A…
Zimmer, Inc.20071

Also cleared against K021891: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.8 years on median.
  • 3 of the 8 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K021891.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

The TrabecularMetal Modular Acetabular System when used with a Trilogy®Neutral, Elevated, Offset or Oblique Liner is indicated for primary or revision surgery for rehabilitating hips damaged as a result of noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NtDJD) or its composite diagnoses of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, protrusio acetabuli, traumatic arthritis, slipped capital epiphysis, fused hip, fracture of the pelvis, and diastrophic variant- The…

Read the full statement (135 words)

The TrabecularMetal Modular Acetabular System when used with a Trilogy®Neutral, Elevated, Offset or Oblique Liner is indicated for primary or revision surgery for rehabilitating hips damaged as a result of noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NtDJD) or its composite diagnoses of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, protrusio acetabuli, traumatic arthritis, slipped capital epiphysis, fused hip, fracture of the pelvis, and diastrophic variant-

The Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System when used with a Trilogy Longevity®) Constrained Liner is indicated for primary or revision total hip arthorplasties where there is a high risk of hip dislocation due to a history of instability, bone loss, joint, muscle or tissue laxity, or disease condition. This device is intended for patients for whom all other options to constrained acetabular components have been considered.

This device is intended for either cemented or noncemented use.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K093561: Zimmer Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K093561

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026