510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Sec Ibf Cage

K093669510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 18, 2010111-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Innvotec Surgical, Inc. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Mar 18, 2010 after a 111-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 1 of the 745 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 744 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Mar 18, 2010
Review
111 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

744 later devices descend from it, 9 citing it directly. 1 of the 745 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 3 descendants cleared2018: 50 descendants cleared2013: 5 descendants cleared2014: 5 descendants cleared2017: 49 descendants cleared2019: 66 descendants cleared2020: 79 descendants cleared2016: 20 descendants cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2021: 65 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12025: 76 descendants cleared2026: 69 descendants cleared2024: 90 descendants cleared2022: 72 descendants cleared2023: 88 descendants cleared2015: 6 descendants cleared2010201520202025
  1. This deviceK093669 Sec Ibf CageInnvotec Surgical, Inc. · 2010
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 743 of its ownK110270 Acculif CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2011
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 718 of its ownK113465 Acculif TL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2011
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 682 of its ownK121683 Acculif TL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2012
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 676 of its ownK123752 Acculif TL and PL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2013
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 645 of its ownK132505 Acculif TL and PL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2013 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 744 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 32012: 12013: 52014: 52015: 62016: 202017: 492018: 502019: 662020: 792021: 652022: 722023: 882024: 902025: 762026: 69
2011high 90 (2024) · low 1 (2012)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 744 · See all
  • K110270Acculif CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly743descendants
  • K113465Acculif TL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly718descendants
  • K121683Acculif TL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2012 · 2 generations on682descendants
  • K123752Acculif TL and PL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2013 · cites it directly676descendants
  • K132505Acculif TL and PL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc. · 2013 · 2 generations on645descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K093669Sec Ibf CageInnvotec Surgical, Inc.2010—
+1K110270Acculif CageCoalign Innovations, Inc.2011—
+1K113465Acculif TL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc.2011—
+2K121683Acculif TL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc.2012—
+1K123752Acculif TL and PL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc.2013—
+2K132505Acculif TL and PL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc.20133

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201130
201210
201350
201450
201560
2016200
2017490
2018500
2019660
2020790
2021651
2022720
2023880
2024900
2025760
2026690
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K093669, 2010–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (744)

See all 744

9 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K110270Acculif CageCoalign Innovations, Inc.2011743
K113465Acculif TL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc.2011718
K123752Acculif TL and PL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc.2013676
K112095Acculif TL-Peek Ibf CageCoalign Innovations, Inc.2011319
K170503EIT Cellular Titanium Cervical Cage, EIT Cellular Titanium PLIF Cages, EIT Cellular…Eit Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH2017199
K172480icotec Interbody Cage SystemIcotec AG20185
K142023Luna Interbody SystemBenvenue Medical, Inc.20145
K172756Varian cageMedyssey USA, Inc.20171
K130194Acculif XL CageCoalign Innovations, Inc.20131

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 4 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K110270 (Coalign Innovations, Inc., 2011) has gone furthest, with 743 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2010, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

Intervertebral Body Fusion Device: The lnnvotec Surgical SEC IBF1 Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion with autogenous bone graft material in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to SI. ODD is defined as hack pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These ODD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or…

Read the full statement (260 words)

Intervertebral Body Fusion Device: The lnnvotec Surgical SEC IBF1 Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion with autogenous bone graft material in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to SI. ODD is defined as hack pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These ODD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have completed six months of non-operative treatment. The Innvotec Surgical SEC lEE Cage is to be used with supplemental fixation.

Vertebral Body Replacement: When used as a vertebral body replacement, the lnnvotec Surgical SEC IBE Cage is intended for partial vertebral body replacement to aid in surgical correction and stabilization of the spine. The device is indicated for use in the thoracolumbar spine (TI to L-5) to replace or restore height a collapsed, damaged, diseased, or unstable portion of a vertebral body, excised as a result of tumor or trauma (i.e., fracture). It is indicated to achieve decompression of the spinal cord and neural tissues, and to restore the height of a collapsed or damaged vertebral body.

The Innvotec Surgical SEC 113E Cage is designed to restore the biomechanical integrity of the anterior, middle, and posterior spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a prolonged period. The Innvotec Surgical SEC lEEF Cage is always to be used with supplemental internal spinal fixation. Additionally, the Innivotec Surgical SEC IBF Cage may be used with bone graft.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K093669: Sec Ibf Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K093669

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026