510(k) · Cleared
ClearedCentral Monitoring System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Edan Instruments, Inc. · HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal
Cleared on Jan 6, 2011 after a 328-day review. The summary cites one number, which could not be confirmed as its predicate (see the table below). 1 later device descends from it.
- Decided
- Jan 6, 2011
- Review
- 328 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- HGM
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
- This deviceK100358 Central Monitoring SystemEdan Instruments, Inc. · 2011
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK112159 CMS-1000FM Central Monitoring SystemAdvanced Instrumentations, Inc. · 2011
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K112159CMS-1000FM Central Monitoring SystemAdvanced Instrumentations, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (this device) | K100358 | Central Monitoring System | Edan Instruments, Inc. | 2011 | — |
| +1 | K112159 | CMS-1000FM Central Monitoring System | Advanced Instrumentations, Inc. | 2011 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in HGM? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new HGM device
- #1 K241882 Fetal & Maternal Monitor (F15A, F15A Air)score 19.5 · 33 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kept off the family tree | K091175 | FDA’s K091175 is Grind NO More Version 2 and 3 Not matched in our reading of the summary (scans can blur digits), so it is kept off the family tree | 2009 |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K112159 | CMS-1000FM Central Monitoring System | 2011 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Of its descendants, K112159 (Advanced Instrumentations, Inc., 2011) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
How does its category compare?
All HGM devicesHGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · HGM
4in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · HGM
269in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · HGM
5in 2019
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · HGM
99in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code HGM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 3 | 56 | 0 | 35 |
| 2008 | 4 | 75 | 4 | 17 |
| 2009 | 4 | 66 | 6 | 42 |
| 2010 | 4 | 193 | 0 | 64 |
| 2011 | 13 | 141 | 0 | 83 |
| 2012 | 4 | 107 | 0 | 44 |
| 2013 | 2 | — | 1 | 16 |
| 2014 | 4 | 231 | 1 | 30 |
| 2015 | 5 | 169 | 0 | 44 |
| 2016 | 1 | — | 0 | 17 |
| 2017 | 3 | 138 | 0 | 27 |
| 2018 | 3 | 258 | 0 | 30 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 5 | 41 |
| 2020 | 1 | — | 0 | 19 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 71 |
| 2022 | 1 | — | 0 | 87 |
| 2023 | 2 | — | 0 | 69 |
| 2024 | 1 | — | 0 | 174 |
| 2025 | 4 | 269 | 0 | 99 |
| 2026 | 2 | — | 2 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Maternal Fetal Monitoring - Central Nurse System (MFM-CNS) is a clinical data managing software application and is indicated for antepartum and intrapartum monitoring of pregnant women in a healthcare setting.
The MFM-CNS is intended to manage perinatal monitoring data acquired from bedside monitors or manual input for viewing at the central nursing station. The system also produces an electronic medical record.
The MFM-CNS has display fields for the following obstetric data:
* patient demographics
* provider notes
* FHR
* uterine activity (via tocodynamometry or IUP)
* maternal heart rate
* SpO2
* NIBP
* respiratory rate
* temperature
* pulse rate
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K100358 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K100358: Central Monitoring System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K100358
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026