510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Nanogen

K102208510(k) TraditionalCleared May 6, 2011274-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3930

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Orthogen, LLC · LYC Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic

Cleared on May 6, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K011403 (Orthogen Corp., 2001) and 1 other predicate after a 274-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1996.

Decided
May 6, 2011
Review
274 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LYC
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K960978 (1996). 10 ancestors in all, the oldest K955096 (1996). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK960978 Wright Plaster of Paris Pellets (Subject to Revision)Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc · 1996
  2. 3 generations backK980817 Pro Osteon Implant 500R Resorbable Bone Graft Substitute Model…Interpore Intl. · 1998
  3. 2 generations backK030288 Polygraft Bone Graft SubstituteOsteobiologics, Inc. · 2003
  4. 1 generation backK060285 Bonegen - TRBio-Lok Intl., Inc. · 2006
  5. This deviceK102208 NanogenOrthogen, LLC · 2011
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K960978Wright Plaster of Paris Pellets (Subject to Revision)Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc1996—
−3K980817Pro Osteon Implant 500R Resorbable Bone Graft Substitute Model Numbers 5RG05…Interpore Intl.1998—
−2K030288Polygraft Bone Graft SubstituteOsteobiologics, Inc.2003—
−1K060285Bonegen - TRBio-Lok Intl., Inc.2006—
0 (this device)K102208NanogenOrthogen, LLC2011—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199710
199810
200110
200420
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K102208, 1996–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LYC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LYC device

  1. #1 K253317 Cytrans™ Elashieldscore 14.3 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K011403Surgiplaster Calcium Sulfate Hemihydrate
Summary page 1
…noGen (Nanocrystalline calcium sulfate particles) COMMON NAME: Hone filling augmentation material SUBSTANTIALLY EQUIVALENT TO: SurgiPlaster K 011403, BoneGen-TR K 060285 DESCRIPTION of the DEVICE: NanoGen is a mixture of particles composed of densely packed grains of nanocrys…
Orthogen Corp.2001—
*K060285Bonegen - TR
Summary page 1
…e calcium sulfate particles) COMMON NAME: Hone filling augmentation material SUBSTANTIALLY EQUIVALENT TO: SurgiPlaster K 011403, BoneGen-TR K 060285 DESCRIPTION of the DEVICE: NanoGen is a mixture of particles composed of densely packed grains of nanocrystalline calcium sulfa…
Bio-Lok Intl., Inc.2006—

Also cleared against K011403: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.8 years on median.
  • 1 of the 10 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K011403.

How does its category compare?

All LYC devices

LYC Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LYC

3in 2025

2007: 132008: 82009: 142010: 132011: 92012: 52013: 22014: 12016: 22020: 32022: 22025: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 14 (2009) · low 0 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LYC

267in 2025

2007: 80 days median2008: 73 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 164 days median2011: 224 days median2012: 120 days median2020: 156 days median2025: 267 days median2026 (partial year): 266 days median
2007high 267 (2025) · low 73 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LYC

1in 2018

2009: 12010: 22012: 22016: 22018: 1
2007high 2 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LYC

2in 2025

2007: 232008: 252009: 252010: 282011: 212012: 102013: 122014: 92015: 142016: 1402017: 192018: 142019: 152020: 52021: 122022: 62023: 92024: 62025: 2
2007high 140 (2016) · low 2 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LYC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071380023
2008873025
200914100125
201013164228
20119224021
20125120210
20132—012
20141—09
20150—014
20162—2140
20170—019
20180—114
20190—015
2020315605
20210—012
20222—06
20230—09
20240—06
2025326702
202632660—

What is it indicated for?

1. By itself in bone regenerative techniques;

2. Mixed with other suitable bone filling agents to prevent particle migration in an osseous defect; and,

3. To provide a resorbable barrier over other bone graft materials.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K102208: Nanogen.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K102208

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026