510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Navigation Marker, Reflective Marker Spheres

K103192510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 7, 2011101-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ilumark GmbH · HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument

Cleared on Feb 7, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K033621 (Northern Digital, Inc., 2004) and 1 other predicate after a 101-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1999. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Feb 7, 2011
Review
101 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HAW
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K983831 (1999). 10 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2004: 2 other ancestors2003: 1 other ancestor2001: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor2011: 1 descendant clearedK983831 · VECTORVISION2 · Brainlab AG · 1999K014256 · Kolibri Igs Systems · Brainlab AG · 2002K042391 · Kolibri Image Guided Surgery System · Brainlab AG · 2004K082060 · Cranial Image Guided Surgery System · Brainlab AG · 2009K100038 · Disposable Reflective Marker Spheres · Brainlab AG · 2010 · recalled1995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 1 other ancestor4 generations back: 2 other ancestors5 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K100038 · Disposable Reflective Marker Spheres · Brainlab AG · 2010 · recalledK082060 · Cranial Image Guided Surgery System · Brainlab AG · 2009K042391 · Kolibri Image Guided Surgery System · Brainlab AG · 2004K014256 · Kolibri Igs Systems · Brainlab AG · 2002K983831 · VECTORVISION2 · Brainlab AG · 1999−50
  1. Root · 5 generations backK983831 VECTORVISION2Brainlab AG · 1999
  2. 4 generations backK014256 Kolibri Igs SystemsBrainlab AG · 2002
  3. 3 generations backK042391 Kolibri Image Guided Surgery SystemBrainlab AG · 2004
  4. 2 generations backK082060 Cranial Image Guided Surgery SystemBrainlab AG · 2009
  5. 1 generation backK100038 Disposable Reflective Marker SpheresBrainlab AG · 2010 · Recalled
  6. This deviceK103192 Navigation Marker, Reflective Marker SpheresIlumark GmbH · 2011
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK111443 X12 Sterile Reflective Marker SpherePinsco Inc. Dba B & L Engineering · 2011

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K111443X12 Sterile Reflective Marker SpherePinsco Inc. Dba B & L Engineering · 2011 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K983831VECTORVISION2Brainlab AG1999—
−4K014256Kolibri Igs SystemsBrainlab AG2002—
−3K042391Kolibri Image Guided Surgery SystemBrainlab AG2004—
−2K082060Cranial Image Guided Surgery SystemBrainlab AG2009—
−1K100038Disposable Reflective Marker SpheresBrainlab AG20103
0 (this device)K103192Navigation Marker, Reflective Marker SpheresIlumark GmbH2011—
+1K111443X12 Sterile Reflective Marker SpherePinsco Inc. Dba B & L Engineering2011—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200010
200110
200310
200420

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K103192, 1999–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HAW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HAW device

  1. #1 K253856 Geniant Cranial (Navigated Neurosurgical…score 15.0 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K033621Ndi Passive Spheres
Summary page 1
…design, dimensional and materials characterization to other legally marketed devices from different manufacturers, e.g. NDl passive Spheres from Northern Digital Inc., #K033621 and Disposable Reflective Marker Spheres from BrainLAB Ag #K1 00038. IK A0250kSu naqyvl .doc R.v. 1…
Northern Digital, Inc.200428
*K100038Disposable Reflective Marker Spheres
Summary page 1
…y marketed devices from different manufacturers, e.g. NDl passive Spheres from Northern Digital Inc., #K033621 and Disposable Reflective Marker Spheres from BrainLAB Ag #K1 00038. IK A0250kSu naqyvl .doc R.v. 1,0 Page1 of 2 === Page 2 ==…
Brainlab AG20103

Also cleared against K033621: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K111443X12 Sterile Reflective Marker SpherePinsco Inc. Dba B & L Engineering20110

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 12 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.3 years on median.
  • 4 of the 10 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K111443 (Pinsco Inc. Dba B & L Engineering, 2011) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K033621.

How does its category compare?

All HAW devices

HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HAW

9in 2025

2007: 152008: 122009: 82010: 62011: 42012: 82013: 32014: 52015: 102016: 92017: 72018: 62019: 102020: 52021: 92022: 72023: 142024: 72025: 92026 (partial year): 5
2007high 15 (2007) · low 3 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HAW

163in 2025

2007: 107 days median2008: 112 days median2009: 221 days median2010: 138 days median2011: 66 days median2012: 178 days median2013: 172 days median2014: 238 days median2015: 232 days median2016: 175 days median2017: 226 days median2018: 112 days median2019: 147 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 168 days median2022: 128 days median2023: 142 days median2024: 107 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 162 days median
2007high 238 (2014) · low 66 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HAW

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 102009: 62010: 282011: 52012: 42013: 6, 1 Class I2014: 52015: 32016: 52017: 22018: 2, 2 Class I2019: 4, 1 Class I2020: 12021: 4, 2 Class I2022: 12023: 4, 1 Class I2024: 2, 2 Class I2025: 22026 (partial year): 6
2007high 28 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (9 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HAW

3,425in 2025

2007: 492008: 532009: 962010: 2992011: 1,7252012: 9862013: 1,2902014: 1,6062015: 1,7672016: 1,8282017: 3,5052018: 4,4392019: 6,0622020: 3,4802021: 2,8272022: 1,9292023: 2,5102024: 3,7552025: 3,425
2007high 6,062 (2019) · low 49 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HAW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200715107249
2008121121053
20098221696
2010613828299
201146651,725
201281784986
201331726 (1)1,290
2014523851,606
20151023231,767
2016917551,828
2017722623,505
201861122 (2)4,439
2019101474 (1)6,062
202058813,480
202191684 (2)2,827
2022712811,929
2023141424 (1)2,510
202471072 (2)3,755
2025916323,425
202651626—

What is it indicated for?

ILUMARK Navigation Markers are intended to be used as image guided surgery system accessory to aid in auto-registration and localization of rigid patient anatomical structure in either open or percutaneous image guided surgery procedures. It is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of an image guided surgery system may be considered to be dppropriate.

ILUMARK Navigation Markers can be used in following procedures:

* Stereotactic brain surgery

* Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

* Pedicle Screw Placement

* Reconstructive orthopedic surgery

* Soft tissue treatment

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K103192: Navigation Marker, Reflective Marker Spheres.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K103192

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026