510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

BT-350

K103545510(k) TraditionalCleared May 13, 2011162-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.2740

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bistos Co., Ltd. · HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal

Cleared on May 13, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K994008 (Biosys Co., Ltd., 2000) after a 162-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1994.

Decided
May 13, 2011
Review
162 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HGM
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K934959 (1994). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK934959 Model 118 Fetal/Maternal MonitorGe Medical Systems Information Technologies · 1994
  2. 1 generation backK994008 Biosys Fetal Monitor, Model Ifm-500Biosys Co., Ltd. · 2000
  3. This deviceK103545 BT-350Bistos Co., Ltd. · 2011
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K934959Model 118 Fetal/Maternal MonitorGe Medical Systems Information Technologies1994—
−1K994008Biosys Fetal Monitor, Model Ifm-500Biosys Co., Ltd.2000—
0 (this device)K103545BT-350Bistos Co., Ltd.2011—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K103545, 1994–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HGM? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HGM device

  1. #1 K241882 Fetal & Maternal Monitor (F15A, F15A Air)score 19.5 · 33 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K994008Biosys Fetal Monitor, Model Ifm-500
Summary page 1
…ate Devices: Manufacturer :Biosys Co., Ltd. Device :IFM-500 Ultrasound Fetal Monitor 510(k) Number :K994008(Decision Date - Sep. 29. 2000) 4. Classifications Names & Citations: 21CFR 884.2740, HGM, System, Monitoring, Perinatal, C…
Biosys Co., Ltd.2000—

Also cleared against K994008: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 10.6 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K994008.

How does its category compare?

All HGM devices

HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HGM

4in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 42010: 42011: 132012: 42013: 22014: 42015: 52016: 12017: 32018: 32020: 12022: 12023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 13 (2011) · low 0 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HGM

269in 2025

2007: 56 days median2008: 75 days median2009: 66 days median2010: 193 days median2011: 141 days median2012: 107 days median2014: 231 days median2015: 169 days median2017: 138 days median2018: 258 days median2025: 269 days median
2007high 269 (2025) · low 56 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HGM

5in 2019

2008: 42009: 62013: 12014: 12019: 52026 (partial year): 2
2007high 6 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HGM

99in 2025

2007: 352008: 172009: 422010: 642011: 832012: 442013: 162014: 302015: 442016: 172017: 272018: 302019: 412020: 192021: 712022: 872023: 692024: 1742025: 99
2007high 174 (2024) · low 16 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HGM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007356035
2008475417
2009466642
20104193064
201113141083
20124107044
20132—116
20144231130
20155169044
20161—017
20173138027
20183258030
20190—541
20201—019
20210—071
20221—087
20232—069
20241—0174
20254269099
20262—2—

What is it indicated for?

The BT-350 is a Prenatal Monitoring System for non-invasively measuring and showing graphically maternal abdominal contractions and the fetal heart rate by means of display on a non-permanent graphical display and on a strip chart recorder. This data is intended to aid in assessing the well being of the fetus during the antepartum periods (Non-Stress Test). Therefore the BT-350 is not used in delivery room. This device is for use only by trained medical personnel located in hospitals, clinics, doctor's offices and in the patient's home.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K103545: BT-350.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K103545

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026