510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device

K110933510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 13, 201170-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Spineology, Inc. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Jun 13, 2011 after a 70-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 185 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 13, 2011
Review
70 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

185 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2015: 1 descendant cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2013: 4 descendants cleared2017: 9 descendants cleared2016: 3 descendants cleared2018: 5 descendants cleared2020: 5 descendants cleared2022: 19 descendants cleared2021: 10 descendants cleared2019: 8 descendants cleared2024: 38 descendants cleared2023: 22 descendants cleared2025: 31 descendants cleared2026: 27 descendants cleared2010201520202025
  1. This deviceK110933 Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc. · 2011
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 184 of its ownK120293 Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DriveSpineology, Inc. · 2012
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 181 of its ownK130396 Rampart O and Rampart PSpineology, Inc. · 2013
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 181 of its ownK123652 Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc. · 2013
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 180 of its ownK131216 Rampart OSpineology, Inc. · 2013
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 180 of its ownK121129 Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc. · 2012

Showing 5 of 185 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2012: 22013: 42014: 12015: 12016: 32017: 92018: 52019: 82020: 52021: 102022: 192023: 222024: 382025: 312026: 27
2012high 38 (2024) · low 1 (2014)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 185 · See all
  • K120293Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DriveSpineology, Inc. · 2012 · cites it directly184descendants
  • K130396Rampart O and Rampart PSpineology, Inc. · 2013 · 2 generations on181descendants
  • K123652Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc. · 2013 · 2 generations on181descendants
  • K131216Rampart OSpineology, Inc. · 2013 · 2 generations on180descendants
  • K121129Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc. · 2012 · 2 generations on180descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K110933Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc.2011—
+1K120293Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DriveSpineology, Inc.2012—
+2K130396Rampart O and Rampart PSpineology, Inc.2013—
+2K123652Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc.2013—
+2K131216Rampart OSpineology, Inc.2013—
+2K121129Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DeviceSpineology, Inc.2012—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201220
201340
201410
201510
201630
201790
201850
201980
202050
2021100
2022190
2023220
2024380
2025310
2026270
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K110933, 2011–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Pivotec Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device, Captiva Spine, Inc.
Named without a submission number
—
*—Capstone Spinal System, Medtronic Sofamor Danek
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (185)

See all 185

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K120293Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion DriveSpineology, Inc.2012184
K151020Rampart-T Interbody Fusion SystemSpineology, Inc.20151

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K120293 (Spineology, Inc., 2012) has gone furthest, with 184 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The Spineology PEEK Lumbar ihterbody Fusion Device is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for interverfrbral body fuision at one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine from L2 to SI in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s), DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. These…

Read the full statement (134 words)

The Spineology PEEK Lumbar ihterbody Fusion Device is an intervertebral body fusion

device indicated for interverfrbral body fuision at one level or two contiguous levels in the

lumbar spine from L2 to SI in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to

Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s), DDD is defined as back pain of

discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and

radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months

of non-operative treatment.

These devices may be implanted via an open or a minimally invasive transforaminal

approach.

The Spineology PEEK Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device is designed for use with

autograft to facilitate fusion and is intended for use with supplemental fixation systems

cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K110933: Spineology Peek Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K110933

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026