510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

NH-301 Ambulatory Ecg Analysis Software

K111487510(k) SpecialCleared Nov 10, 2011163-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2800

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Norav Medical Corp. · MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm

Cleared on Nov 10, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K012712 (Norav Medical, Ltd., 2002) after a 163-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2002.

Decided
Nov 10, 2011
Review
163 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MLO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K012712 (2002). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K012712 · Norav Holter System, Model NH-300 V1.07 · Norav Medical, Ltd. · 20022000200220042006200820102012
  1. Root · 1 generation backK012712 Norav Holter System, Model NH-300 V1.07Norav Medical, Ltd. · 2002
  2. This deviceK111487 NH-301 Ambulatory Ecg Analysis SoftwareNorav Medical Corp. · 2011
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K012712Norav Holter System, Model NH-300 V1.07Norav Medical, Ltd.2002—
0 (this device)K111487NH-301 Ambulatory Ecg Analysis SoftwareNorav Medical Corp.2011—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K111487, 2002–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MLO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MLO device

  1. #1 K261580 ZBPro Diagnostic (Version 2.0)score 13.8 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K012712Norav Holter System, Model NH-300 V1.07
Summary page 1
…electrocardiograph, telephone Substantial Equivalence 21 CFR 807 92(a)(3) Norav's NH-300 Holter Analysis System k012712 for complete structural and functional identity of both software applications as well as their intended use and indications for u…
Norav Medical, Ltd.2002—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.

How does its category compare?

All MLO devices

MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MLO

1in 2025

2007: 12010: 12011: 32012: 12013: 22014: 12018: 12020: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2011) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MLO

238in 2011

2011: 238 days median
2007high 238 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MLO

2in 2024

2024: 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MLO

4in 2025

2009: 52010: 12011: 12014: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 22025: 4
2007high 5 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MLO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20090—05
20101—01
2011323801
20121—00
20132—00
20141—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—01
20181—01
20190—01
20202—00
20210—01
20220—01
20230—01
20241—22
20251—04
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The NH-301 Ambulatory ECG Analysis Software is intended for patients requiring ambulatory (Halter) monitoring from i to 168 hours. Such monitoring is most frequently used for the following indications: 1. Evaluation of symptoms suggesting arrfhythmia or myocardial ischemnia. 2. Evaluation of ECG documenting therapeutic interventions in individual patients or groups of patients. 3. Evaluation of patients for ST segment changes. 4. Evaluation of patient's…

Read the full statement (125 words)

The NH-301 Ambulatory ECG Analysis Software is intended for patients requiring ambulatory (Halter) monitoring from i to 168 hours. Such monitoring is most frequently used for the following indications:

1. Evaluation of symptoms suggesting arrfhythmia or myocardial ischemnia.

2. Evaluation of ECG documenting therapeutic interventions in individual patients or groups of

patients.

3. Evaluation of patients for ST segment changes.

4. Evaluation of patient's response after resuming occupational or recreational activities, (e.g.,

after Mil. or cardiac surgery.)

5. Clinical and epidemiological research studies.

6. Norav Hotter Systems containing Heart Rate Variability (HRV) software have been tested to

measure Heart Rate Variability within 4 ms tolerance. The clinical significance of Heart Rate

Variability measures should be determined by a physician.

7. Evaluation of patients with pacemakers

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K111487: NH-301 Ambulatory Ecg Analysis Software.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K111487

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026