510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Venus Pearl PLT Refill A1

K112501510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 14, 2011106-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3690

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Heraeus Kulzer, LLC · EBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin

Cleared on Dec 14, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K083610 (3M Company, 2008) after a 106-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2008. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Dec 14, 2011
Review
106 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EBF
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K083610 (2008). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2026: 1 descendant clearedK083610 · Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative · 3M Company · 200820052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K083610 · Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative · 3M Company · 20080
  1. Root · 1 generation backK083610 Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative3M Company · 2008
  2. This deviceK112501 Venus Pearl PLT Refill A1Heraeus Kulzer, LLC · 2011
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK260783 Venus Diamond; Venus Diamond Flow; Venus Pearl; Venus Bulk Flow OneKulzer, LLC · 2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K260783Venus Diamond; Venus Diamond Flow; Venus Pearl; Venus Bulk Flow OneKulzer, LLC · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K083610Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative3M Company2008—
0 (this device)K112501Venus Pearl PLT Refill A1Heraeus Kulzer, LLC2011—
+1K260783Venus Diamond; Venus Diamond Flow; Venus Pearl; Venus Bulk Flow OneKulzer, LLC2026—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K112501, 2008–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EBF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EBF device

  1. #1 K202846 Tera Harzscore 18.5 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
Kept off the family treeK073564Venus Diamond
Not in FDA’s 510(k), De Novo or PMA lists as we hold them (a misreading, a typo, or a number FDA does not list), so it is kept off the family tree
Summary page 1
…ct Class: 11code EBF M~ Substanially equivalenc Venus Pearl (Project Name SOCO - D 933) is an advanced version of the product Venus Diamond formally NEUN (K073564). The components and their ratio in Venus Diamond and Venus Peedl are similar. The new composite was optimized for ante…
*K083610Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative
Summary page 1
…e of Venus Pearl is identical to the approved dental composite Venus Diamond. Venus Pearl is substantially equivalent to the product FilteR Supreme Ultra (K083610). M4 D-escrlntion of the devic Venus Pearl is a, universal light-curing, radio-opaque nano-hybrid composite for…
3M Company2008—

Also cleared against K083610: 10 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K260783Venus Diamond; Venus Diamond Flow; Venus Pearl; Venus Bulk Flow OneKulzer, LLC20260

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K260783 (Kulzer, LLC, 2026) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 10 other devices also cite its predicate K083610.

How does its category compare?

All EBF devices

EBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · EBF

15in 2025

2007: 192008: 142009: 202010: 192011: 192012: 112013: 132014: 102015: 172016: 202017: 152018: 152019: 172020: 152021: 132022: 172023: 92024: 182025: 152026 (partial year): 16
2007high 20 (2009) · low 9 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EBF

43in 2025

2007: 49 days median2008: 79 days median2009: 84 days median2010: 75 days median2011: 81 days median2012: 86 days median2013: 153 days median2014: 112 days median2015: 123 days median2016: 205 days median2017: 108 days median2018: 115 days median2019: 159 days median2020: 190 days median2021: 178 days median2022: 63 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 120 days median2025: 43 days median2026 (partial year): 59 days median
2007high 205 (2016) · low 43 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EBF

1in 2020

2007: 12008: 422009: 12010: 62011: 72017: 42019: 22020: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 42 (2008) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EBF

1in 2025

2007: 62008: 102009: 82010: 312011: 312012: 622013: 2462014: 1952015: 1192016: 1432017: 422018: 82019: 112020: 22021: 22022: 22023: 82024: 52025: 1
2007high 246 (2013) · low 1 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EBF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007194916
200814794210
2009208418
20101975631
20111981731
20121186062
2013131530246
2014101120195
2015171230119
2016202050143
201715108442
20181511508
201917159211
20201519012
20211317802
2022176302
202398708
20241812005
2025154301
202616592—

What is it indicated for?

Direct restoration of Class I - V cavities (acc. to &_V. Black)

Direct composite veneers

Shape corrections of teeth (i.e. diastemas, congenital defects in teeth etc.)

Splinting of teeth loosened by trauma or periodontal disease

Indirect restorations (inlays, veneers)

Restoration of primary teeth

Core build-up

Repairs of porcelain, composite (in combination with an adequate repair system)

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K112501: Venus Pearl PLT Refill A1.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K112501

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026