510(k) · Cleared
ClearedVenus Diamond; Venus Diamond Flow; Venus Pearl; Venus Bulk Flow One
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Kulzer, LLC · EBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin
Cleared on Mar 11, 2026 as substantially equivalent to K073554 (Heraeus Kulzer,GmbH, 2008) and 3 other predicates after a 1-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2008.
- Decided
- Mar 11, 2026
- Review
- 1 day
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- EBF
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 4
Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K083610 (2008). 5 ancestors in all, the oldest K073554 (2008). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2 | K083610 | Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative | 3M Company | 2008 | — |
| −1 | K112501 | Venus Pearl PLT Refill A1 | Heraeus Kulzer, LLC | 2011 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K260783 | Venus Diamond; Venus Diamond Flow; Venus Pearl; Venus Bulk Flow One | Kulzer, LLC | 2026 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 1 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in EBF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new EBF device
- #1 K202846 Tera Harzscore 18.5 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (4)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K073554 | NEUNSummary page 9…Page 9 === 2 Legally Marketed Predicate Devices For the purpose of substantial equivalence, the following primary predicates apply: • Venus Diamond -> Neun (K073554) • Venus Diamond Flow -> Venus Diamond Flow (K091635) • Venus Pearl -> Venus Pearl PLT A1 (K112501) • Venus… | 2008 |
| * | K091635 | Venus Diamond FlowSummary page 9…purpose of substantial equivalence, the following primary predicates apply: • Venus Diamond -> Neun (K073554) • Venus Diamond Flow -> Venus Diamond Flow (K091635) • Venus Pearl -> Venus Pearl PLT A1 (K112501) • Venus Bulk Flow ONE -> Venus Bulk Flow ONE (K220605) Reference… | 2009 |
| * | K112501 | Venus Pearl PLT Refill A1Summary page 9…imary predicates apply: • Venus Diamond -> Neun (K073554) • Venus Diamond Flow -> Venus Diamond Flow (K091635) • Venus Pearl -> Venus Pearl PLT A1 (K112501) • Venus Bulk Flow ONE -> Venus Bulk Flow ONE (K220605) Reference Devices Used to support methods/benchmarks for align… | 2011 |
| * | K220605 | Venus Bulk Flow ONESummary page 9…54) • Venus Diamond Flow -> Venus Diamond Flow (K091635) • Venus Pearl -> Venus Pearl PLT A1 (K112501) • Venus Bulk Flow ONE -> Venus Bulk Flow ONE (K220605) Reference Devices Used to support methods/benchmarks for aligner-related indications: • AlignerFlow LC (K231817) – D… | 2022 |
| † | K231817 | AlignerFlow LC | 2023 |
| † | K150128 | GC Ortho Connect, GC Ortho Etching Gel | 2015 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 18 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 14.2 years on median.
- None of the 5 ancestors has a recall.
How does its category compare?
All EBF devicesEBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2026, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · EBF
15in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · EBF
43in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · EBF
1in 2020
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · EBF
1in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code EBF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 19 | 49 | 1 | 6 |
| 2008 | 14 | 79 | 42 | 10 |
| 2009 | 20 | 84 | 1 | 8 |
| 2010 | 19 | 75 | 6 | 31 |
| 2011 | 19 | 81 | 7 | 31 |
| 2012 | 11 | 86 | 0 | 62 |
| 2013 | 13 | 153 | 0 | 246 |
| 2014 | 10 | 112 | 0 | 195 |
| 2015 | 17 | 123 | 0 | 119 |
| 2016 | 20 | 205 | 0 | 143 |
| 2017 | 15 | 108 | 4 | 42 |
| 2018 | 15 | 115 | 0 | 8 |
| 2019 | 17 | 159 | 2 | 11 |
| 2020 | 15 | 190 | 1 | 2 |
| 2021 | 13 | 178 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 17 | 63 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 9 | 87 | 0 | 8 |
| 2024 | 18 | 120 | 0 | 5 |
| 2025 | 15 | 43 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 16 | 59 | 2 | — |
What is it indicated for?
• Class I, II, III, IV and V direct restorations • First-layer lining for class I and II cavities • Repair of direct and indirect restorations in combination with a suitable adhesive • Splinting of teeth • Extended fissure sealing • Composite attachments for aligner treatment • Fixation of retainers * Enlarged fissure sealing * Cavity lining — as the first layer for Class I and II cavities e Class I, II, III, IV and V direct restorations * Small repairs…
Read the full statement (218 words)
• Class I, II, III, IV and V direct restorations
• First-layer lining for class I and II cavities
• Repair of direct and indirect restorations in combination with a suitable adhesive
• Splinting of teeth
• Extended fissure sealing
• Composite attachments for aligner treatment
• Fixation of retainers
* Enlarged fissure sealing
* Cavity lining — as the first layer for Class I and II cavities
e Class I, II, III, IV and V direct restorations
* Small repairs of direct and indirect restorations combined with a suitable bonding agent
* Splinting of teeth
» Composite attachments for aligner treatment
» Fixation of retainers
* Direct restorations of all cavity classes
* Direct composite veneers
» Shape corrections of teeth (i.e. diastemas, congenital defects in teeth, etc.)
* Splinting of teeth
* Restoration of primary teeth
* Core build-up
* Repairs of porcelain, composite (in combination with an adequate repair-system)
» Composite attachments for aligner treatment
» Fixation of retainers
* Direct restorations of all cavity classes
* Direct composite veneers
» Shape corrections of teeth (i.e. diastemas, congenital defects in teeth, etc.)
* Splinting of teeth
* Restoration of primary teeth
* Core build-up
* Repairs of porcelain, composite (in combination with an adequate repair-system)
» Composite attachments for aligner treatment
» Fixation of retainers
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K260783 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K260783: Venus Diamond; Venus Diamond Flow; Venus Pearl; Venus Bulk Flow One.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K260783
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026