510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

ONDEMAND3D

K113543510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 16, 201115-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cybermed, Inc. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Dec 16, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K070464 (Cybermed, Inc., 2007) and 3 other predicates after a 15-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1996. 9 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 16, 2011
Review
15 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K954874 (1996). 38 ancestors in all, the oldest K871859 (1987). 9 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2007: 2 other ancestors2004: 3 other ancestors2006: 3 other ancestors2005: 1 other ancestor2003: 2 other ancestors2002: 2 other ancestors2001: 4 other ancestors1997: 2 other ancestors1993: 4 other ancestors2000: 3 other ancestors1999: 2 other ancestors1998: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor1987: 1 other ancestor2013: 2 descendants cleared2016: 4 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2025: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant clearedK954874 · Spectef Protocol · GE Medical Systems · 1996K980914 · Emory Cardiac Tool Box · Emory University · 1998K992450 · Emory Cardiac Toolbox* 2.0 Executing on Nuclear Medicine Computers · Emory University · 1999K014033 · Emory Cardiac Toolbox 2.1 Executing on Nuclear Medicine Computers · Syntermed, Inc. · 2002K040141 · Emory Cardiac Toolbox Version 2.6 · Syntermed, Inc. · 2004K061370 · Cardiq Fusion · GE Healthcare · 20061990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 3 other ancestors2 generations back: 11 other ancestors3 generations back: 9 other ancestors4 generations back: 6 other ancestors5 generations back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 3 descendants2 generations forward: 3 descendants3 generations forward: 1 descendant4 generations forward: 1 descendant5 generations forward: 1 descendant K061370 · Cardiq Fusion · GE Healthcare · 2006K040141 · Emory Cardiac Toolbox Version 2.6 · Syntermed, Inc. · 2004K014033 · Emory Cardiac Toolbox 2.1 Executing on Nuclear Medicine Computers · Syntermed, Inc. · 2002K992450 · Emory Cardiac Toolbox* 2.0 Executing on Nuclear Medicine Computers · Emory University · 1999K980914 · Emory Cardiac Tool Box · Emory University · 1998K954874 · Spectef Protocol · GE Medical Systems · 1996−50+5
  1. Root · 6 generations backK954874 Spectef ProtocolGE Medical Systems · 1996
  2. 5 generations backK980914 Emory Cardiac Tool BoxEmory University · 1998
  3. 4 generations backK992450 Emory Cardiac Toolbox* 2.0 Executing on Nuclear Medicine ComputersEmory University · 1999
  4. 3 generations backK014033 Emory Cardiac Toolbox 2.1 Executing on Nuclear Medicine ComputersSyntermed, Inc. · 2002
  5. 2 generations backK040141 Emory Cardiac Toolbox Version 2.6Syntermed, Inc. · 2004
  6. 1 generation backK061370 Cardiq FusionGE Healthcare · 2006
  7. This deviceK113543 ONDEMAND3DCybermed, Inc. · 2011
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK131616 EZ3D-I, E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd. · 2013
  9. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK150761 Ez3D-i/E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd. · 2015
  10. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK161246 Ez3D-i / E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd. · 2016
  11. Descendant · 4 generations on · 1 of its ownK163539 Ez3D-i / E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd. · 2016
  12. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK152746 Ez3D PlusEwoosoft Co., Ltd. · 2016

Showing 5 of 9 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2013: 22015: 12016: 42018: 12025: 1
2013high 4 (2016) · low 0 (2014)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 9 · See all
  • K131616EZ3D-I, E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd. · 2013 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K150761Ez3D-i/E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd. · 2015 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K161246Ez3D-i / E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd. · 2016 · 3 generations on2descendants
  • K163539Ez3D-i / E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd. · 2016 · 4 generations on1descendant
  • K152746Ez3D PlusEwoosoft Co., Ltd. · 2016 · cites it directly1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K954874Spectef ProtocolGE Medical Systems1996—
−5K980914Emory Cardiac Tool BoxEmory University1998—
−4K992450Emory Cardiac Toolbox* 2.0 Executing on Nuclear Medicine ComputersEmory University1999—
−3K014033Emory Cardiac Toolbox 2.1 Executing on Nuclear Medicine ComputersSyntermed, Inc.2002—
−2K040141Emory Cardiac Toolbox Version 2.6Syntermed, Inc.2004—
−1K061370Cardiq FusionGE Healthcare2006—
0 (this device)K113543ONDEMAND3DCybermed, Inc.2011—
+1K131616EZ3D-I, E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd.2013—
+2K150761Ez3D-i/E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd.2015—
+3K161246Ez3D-i / E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd.2016—
+4K163539Ez3D-i / E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd.2016—
+1K152746Ez3D PlusEwoosoft Co., Ltd.2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198710
199340
199510
199610
199720
199810
199920
200030
200140
200220
200320
200430
200510
200630
200720

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201320
201510
201640
201810
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K113543, 1996–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K070464ONDEMAND3D
Summary page 1
…er: :CyberMed, Inc. Device: :OnDemand3D TM 510(k) Number: :K070464 (Decision Date - 03/16/2007) Manufacturer: :Materialise, N.V.…
Cybermed, Inc.2007—
*K033849Simplant System
Summary page 1
…:Materialise, N.V. Device: :SimPlant System 510(k) Number: :K033849 (Decision Date - 05/25/2004) Manufacturer: :Anatomage, Inc.…
Materialise NV2004—
*K070803Invivodental
Summary page 1
…rer: :Anatomage, Inc. Device: :Invivo Dental 510(k) Number: :K070803 (Decision Date - 04/06/2007) Manufacturer: :GE Medical systems SCS…
Anatomage, Inc.2007—
*K061370Cardiq Fusion
Summary page 2
…1537 - dbliU1 CyberMed, Inc. Device: :CardIQ Fusion 510(k) Number: :K061370 (Decision Date - 05/30/2006) 4. Classifications Names & Citations : 21CFR 892.2050, LLZ, Picture archiving and communicat…
GE Healthcare2006—

Also cleared against K070464: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (9)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K131616EZ3D-I, E3Ewoosoft Co., Ltd.20134
K152746Ez3D PlusEwoosoft Co., Ltd.20161
K132773Sidexis 4Sirona Dental Systems GmbH20131

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.3 years on median.
  • 3 of the 38 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K131616 (Ewoosoft Co., Ltd., 2013) has gone furthest, with 4 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K070464.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

The OnDemand3D G2 is intended for use as a software package which loads DICOM images from CT, MR, X-Ray, stores those and provides 3D visualization and 20 analysis, various MPR (Multi-Planar Reconstruction) functions for further rapid and precise diagnosis. It also provides the following functions as shown below. 1) Functions for implant surgery planning and fabricating a surgical guide according to the plan 2) Functions to combine and show the image…

Read the full statement (123 words)

The OnDemand3D G2 is intended for use as a software package which loads DICOM images from CT, MR, X-Ray, stores those and provides 3D visualization and 20 analysis, various MPR (Multi-Planar Reconstruction) functions for further rapid and precise diagnosis.

It also provides the following functions as shown below.

1) Functions for implant surgery planning and fabricating a surgical guide according to the plan

2) Functions to combine and show the image data from different modalities such as CT, MRI and PET in one window at the same time

3) Functions to create orthodontic analysis using 3D volume data

4) Functions to sort and save DICOM files, Project Files and 2D image files from different modality [Panorama, Cephalometric, intraoral] under a single patient name

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K113543: ONDEMAND3D.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K113543

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026