510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Viper and Expedium Navigated Instruments

K120867510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 20, 2012182-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medos International SARL · OLO Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument

Cleared on Sep 20, 2012 as substantially equivalent to K070106 (Brainlab AG, 2007) after a 182-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1999. 1 of the 13 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 20, 2012
Review
182 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OLO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K983831 (1999). 10 ancestors in all, the oldest K981508 (1998). 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly. 1 of the 13 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 other ancestor2001: 2 other ancestors1998: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor2014: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant clearedK983831 · VECTORVISION2 · Brainlab AG · 1999K014256 · Kolibri Igs Systems · Brainlab AG · 2002K042721 · Kolibri Spine · Brainlab AG · 2005K053159 · Vectorvision Spine · Brainlab AG · 2006 · recalledK070106 · VV Fluoro 3D · Brainlab AG · 2007 · Class I recall1995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 2 other ancestors5 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant K070106 · VV Fluoro 3D · Brainlab AG · 2007 · Class I recallK053159 · Vectorvision Spine · Brainlab AG · 2006 · recalledK042721 · Kolibri Spine · Brainlab AG · 2005K014256 · Kolibri Igs Systems · Brainlab AG · 2002K983831 · VECTORVISION2 · Brainlab AG · 1999−50
  1. Root · 5 generations backK983831 VECTORVISION2Brainlab AG · 1999
  2. 4 generations backK014256 Kolibri Igs SystemsBrainlab AG · 2002
  3. 3 generations backK042721 Kolibri SpineBrainlab AG · 2005
  4. 2 generations backK053159 Vectorvision SpineBrainlab AG · 2006 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK070106 VV Fluoro 3DBrainlab AG · 2007 · Recalled (Class I)
  6. This deviceK120867 Viper and Expedium Navigated InstrumentsMedos International SARL · 2012
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK140927 Universal Navigation InstrumentsMedos International SARL · 2014
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK192495 Black Diamond Navigation InstrumentsOsseus Fusion Systems · 2020

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K140927Universal Navigation InstrumentsMedos International SARL · 2014 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K192495Black Diamond Navigation InstrumentsOsseus Fusion Systems · 2020 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K983831VECTORVISION2Brainlab AG1999—
−4K014256Kolibri Igs SystemsBrainlab AG2002—
−3K042721Kolibri SpineBrainlab AG2005—
−2K053159Vectorvision SpineBrainlab AG20061
−1K070106VV Fluoro 3DBrainlab AG2007Class I
0 (this device)K120867Viper and Expedium Navigated InstrumentsMedos International SARL2012—
+1K140927Universal Navigation InstrumentsMedos International SARL2014—
+2K192495Black Diamond Navigation InstrumentsOsseus Fusion Systems2020—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810
200010
200120
200310

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201410
202010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K120867, 1999–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OLO device

  1. #1 K240662 Spine Guidance Software (version 5.0); Xia 3/…score 23.7 · 15 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K070106VV Fluoro 3D
Summary page 1
…oduct and Panel Code: OLO; Orthopedic D. Predicate Device Name Trade name: Brainlab VectorVision Fluoro 3D) system (K070106) MEDOS International, SArl E. Device Description The VIPER® and EXPEDIUM® navigated instruments are…
Brainlab AG2007Class I

Also cleared against K070106: 9 other devices →

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K140927Universal Navigation InstrumentsMedos International SARL20141

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K070106VV Fluoro 3DBrainlab AG · 2007 · Direct predicate · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.8 years on median.
  • 3 of the 10 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K140927 (Medos International SARL, 2014) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 9 other devices also cite its predicate K070106.

How does its category compare?

All OLO devices

OLO Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OLO

40in 2025

2009: 112010: 92011: 112012: 72013: 72014: 102015: 102016: 142017: 332018: 242019: 352020: 342021: 282022: 402023: 452024: 442025: 402026 (partial year): 42
2007high 45 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OLO

119in 2025

2009: 126 days median2010: 113 days median2011: 138 days median2012: 129 days median2013: 137 days median2014: 119 days median2015: 176 days median2016: 120 days median2017: 91 days median2018: 97 days median2019: 95 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 91 days median2022: 89 days median2023: 90 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 119 days median2026 (partial year): 109 days median
2007high 176 (2015) · low 89 (2020)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OLO

1in 2025

2010: 12011: 12012: 12014: 32015: 22016: 32017: 22018: 12019: 12020: 62022: 52023: 7, 1 Class I2024: 42025: 12026 (partial year): 6
2007high 7 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OLO

3,306in 2025

2008: 12009: 42010: 42011: 102012: 602013: 362014: 2452015: 4662016: 7502017: 1,0762018: 1,2302019: 1,5852020: 2,7462021: 1,6962022: 1,5682023: 1,4932024: 2,3532025: 3,306
2007high 3,306 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OLO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20091112604
2010911314
201111138110
20127129160
20137137036
2014101193245
2015101762466
2016141203750
2017339121,076
2018249711,230
2019359511,585
2020348962,746
2021289101,696
2022408951,568
202345907 (1)1,493
2024449042,353
20254011913,306
2026421096—

What is it indicated for?

The VIPER®)and EXPEDIUM® navigated instruments are image guided surgical instruments for use in the implantation of VIPER@ and EXPEDIUM® pedicle screws in an open or percutaneous approach. The navigated instruments are designed for use only with Brainlab Image Guided Surgery hardware and software. The navigated instruments are indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, where the use of the VIPER®…

Read the full statement (116 words)

The VIPER®)and EXPEDIUM® navigated instruments are image guided surgical instruments for use in the implantation of VIPER@ and EXPEDIUM® pedicle screws in an open or percutaneous approach. The navigated instruments are designed for use only with Brainlab Image Guided Surgery hardware and software. The navigated instruments are indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, where the use of the VIPER® and/or EXPEDIUM® Spine Systems is indicated and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the pelvis or a vertebra can be identified relative to the acquired image (CT, MR, 2D fluoroscopic image or 3D fluoroscopic image reconstruction) and/or an image data based model of the anatomy.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K120867: Viper and Expedium Navigated Instruments.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K120867

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026