510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2014

Weck Vista Optical Bladeless Laparoscopic Access Port

K121380510(k) SpecialCleared May 25, 201217-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.1500Recalls 3

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Teleflexmedical, Inc. · GCJ Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery

Cleared on May 25, 2012 as substantially equivalent to K010007 (Taut, Inc., 2001) and 1 other predicate after a 17-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2001. It has been recalled 3 times.

Decided
May 25, 2012
Review
17 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GCJ
Recalls
3
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K010007 (2001). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK010007 Adapt Laparoscopic Port & Adapt Reducer CapTaut, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
  2. 1 generation backK082156 Adapt Universal Laparoscopic Port, Model 405940, 405912, 40591213Teleflex Medical · 2008 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK121380 Weck Vista Optical Bladeless Laparoscopic Access PortTeleflexmedical, Inc. · 2012
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K010007Adapt Laparoscopic Port & Adapt Reducer CapTaut, Inc.20013
−1K082156Adapt Universal Laparoscopic Port, Model 405940, 405912, 40591213Teleflex Medical20085
0 (this device)K121380Weck Vista Optical Bladeless Laparoscopic Access PortTeleflexmedical, Inc.2012—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K121380, 2001–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GCJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GCJ device

  1. #1 K214046 780 nm 1688 4K Camera System, 780 nm L11 LED…score 21.4 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K010007Adapt Laparoscopic Port & Adapt Reducer Cap
Summary page 2
…es: Predicate Device Manufacturer 510(k) No. Date Cleared ADAPtL-M Laparoscopic Port Teleflex Medical, Inc. / K010007 02/22/01 and Accessory Taut, Inc. _______________ ADAPtTM Universal…
Taut, Inc.20013
*K082156Adapt Universal Laparoscopic Port, Model 405940, 405912, 40591213
Summary page 2
…02/22/01 and Accessory Taut, Inc. _______________ ADAPtTM Universal Teleflex Medical, Inc. K082 156 09/10/2008 Laparoscopic Port ___________ ______ 1. Comparison To Predicate Devices…
Teleflex Medical20085

Also cleared against K010007: 7 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 11, 2014Class IIZ-1283-2014Nonconforming Material/ComponentComplaints were received of leakage of insufflation gas through the device, which can cause difficulty or delay in the completion of laparoscopic surgical procedures.
Mar 11, 2014Class IIZ-1325-2014Nonconforming Material/ComponentComplaints of leakage of insufflation gas through the device.
Mar 11, 2014Class IIZ-1278-2014Nonconforming Material/ComponentComplaints were received of leakage of insufflation gas through the device, which can cause difficulty or delay in the completion of laparoscopic surgical procedures.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 11 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.5 years on median.
  • 2 of the 2 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 7 other devices also cite its predicate K010007.

How does its category compare?

All GCJ devices

GCJ Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GCJ

21in 2025

2007: 182008: 192009: 212010: 242011: 152012: 172013: 152014: 192015: 262016: 272017: 202018: 212019: 152020: 282021: 182022: 202023: 312024: 292025: 212026 (partial year): 26
2007high 31 (2023) · low 15 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GCJ

108in 2025

2007: 42 days median2008: 73 days median2009: 85 days median2010: 122 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 88 days median2013: 93 days median2014: 90 days median2015: 76 days median2016: 99 days median2017: 77 days median2018: 88 days median2019: 60 days median2020: 61 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 103 days median2023: 109 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 108 days median2026 (partial year): 122 days median
2007high 122 (2010) · low 42 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GCJ

5in 2025

2007: 122008: 162009: 62010: 302011: 92012: 12013: 7, 1 Class I2014: 22016: 52017: 12018: 12022: 12023: 12025: 52026 (partial year): 1
2007high 30 (2010) · low 0 (2015)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GCJ

5,860in 2025

2007: 1,6392008: 1,3192009: 1,9952010: 2,6572011: 2,1332012: 1,5262013: 1,5652014: 1,7142015: 1,7102016: 2,0802017: 3,4682018: 2,5622019: 2,5782020: 2,6182021: 3,4312022: 3,9452023: 6,0022024: 6,0472025: 5,860
2007high 6,047 (2024) · low 1,319 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GCJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071842121,639
20081973161,319
2009218561,995
201024122302,657
20111511392,133
2012178811,526
201315937 (1)1,565
2014199021,714
2015267601,710
2016279952,080
2017207713,468
2018218812,562
2019156002,578
2020286102,618
20211811603,431
20222010313,945
20233110916,002
2024299006,047
20252110855,860
2026261221—

What is it indicated for?

The Weck® VistaTM' Optical Bladeless Laparoscopic Access Port is indicated for use in thoracic, abdominal, and gynecologic minimally invasive surgical procedures to provide a pathway for the introduction of endoscopic surgical devices.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K121380: Weck Vista Optical Bladeless Laparoscopic Access Port.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K121380

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026