510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Perifuse Catheter

K121525510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 2, 201271-day reviewClass II21 CFR 868.5140

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Smiths Medical Asd, Inc. · CAZ Anesthesia Conduction Kit

Cleared on Aug 2, 2012 as substantially equivalent to K001129 (Life-Tech Intl., Inc., 2000) and 1 other predicate after a 71-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1981.

Decided
Aug 2, 2012
Review
71 days
Class
Class II
Product code
CAZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K813186 (1981). 4 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K994275 · Sims Portex Anesthesia Catheter · Sims Portex, Inc. · 2000K813186 · Perfix Set for Epidural Anesthesia W/Tuo · Burron Medical Products, Inc. · 19810
  1. Root · 2 generations backK813186 Perfix Set for Epidural Anesthesia W/TuoBurron Medical Products, Inc. · 1981
  2. 1 generation backK994275 Sims Portex Anesthesia CatheterSims Portex, Inc. · 2000
  3. This deviceK121525 Perifuse CatheterSmiths Medical Asd, Inc. · 2012
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K813186Perfix Set for Epidural Anesthesia W/TuoBurron Medical Products, Inc.1981—
−1K994275Sims Portex Anesthesia CatheterSims Portex, Inc.2000—
0 (this device)K121525Perifuse CatheterSmiths Medical Asd, Inc.2012—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K121525, 1981–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in CAZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new CAZ device

  1. #1 K261372 Profoject™ LOR Syringescore 12.4 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K001129Prolong, Models PL50, PL100, PL150
Summary page 1
…ter Common Name: Anesthesia Conduction Kit Classification Name: Anesthesia Conduction Kit, (21 CER 868.5140, Product Code CAZ) Predicate Device(s): PrimaryPredicate K 001 129, ProLong® Regional Anesthesia Catheter, Model PL5O, PLi 00, PLI50 Secondary Predicate K994275, SIMS Portex An…
Life-Tech Intl., Inc.20001
*K994275Sims Portex Anesthesia Catheter
Summary page 1
…Code CAZ) Predicate Device(s): PrimaryPredicate K 001 129, ProLong® Regional Anesthesia Catheter, Model PL5O, PLi 00, PLI50 Secondary Predicate K994275, SIMS Portex Anesthesia Catheter Reference Device(s): K(033084, Wallace (SureViewTm) Embryo Replacement Catheters & Trial Trans…
Sims Portex, Inc.2000—
†K033084Wallace (Sure View) Embryo Replacement Catheter and Trial Transfer CatheterPortex, Ltd.20036

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 31 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 18.2 years on median.
  • 1 of the 4 ancestors has a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All CAZ devices

CAZ Anesthesia Conduction Kit: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · CAZ

1in 2023

2007: 42008: 42009: 22010: 22011: 12012: 92015: 12016: 22019: 12020: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2012) · low 0 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · CAZ

108in 2012

2007: 172 days median2008: 99 days median2012: 108 days median
2007high 172 (2007) · low 99 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · CAZ

1in 2024

2009: 292010: 82011: 22013: 122014: 22015: 12016: 12024: 12026 (partial year): 12, 11 Class I
2007high 29 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (11 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · CAZ

137in 2025

2007: 812008: 802009: 1342010: 1392011: 1872012: 1872013: 2762014: 2512015: 2352016: 3722017: 3532018: 4482019: 4722020: 2742021: 1652022: 2702023: 602024: 1652025: 137
2007high 472 (2019) · low 60 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code CAZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20074172081
2008499080
20092—29134
20102—8139
20111—2187
201291080187
20130—12276
20140—2251
20151—1235
20162—1372
20170—0353
20180—0448
20191—0472
20201—0274
20211—0165
20221—0270
20231—060
20240—1165
20250—0137
20261—12 (11)—

What is it indicated for?

The PeriFuseTM regional anesthesia Catheter is indicated for use during procedures where intermittent administration of local anesthetics is indicated for control of operative, post-operative, acute or chronic pain for peripheral nerve block procedures. The duration of use should not exceed 72 hours.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K121525: Perifuse Catheter.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K121525

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026