510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Stingray Cervical Cage

K122085510(k) AbbreviatedCleared Oct 17, 201293-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Omni Surgical, LP Dba Spine360 · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Oct 17, 2012 as substantially equivalent to K082801 (Us Spine, 2008) and 1 other predicate after a 93-day review. Its family tree reaches back 11 generations to 1984.

Decided
Oct 17, 2012
Review
93 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 11 generations to K841189 (1984). 29 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 7 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  4. 2 generations backK080401 Shell Cage, Wave Cage, Loop CageAdvanced Medical Technologies AG · 2008
  5. 1 generation backK082801 Phantom Plus Cage SystemUs Spine · 2008
  6. This deviceK122085 Stingray Cervical CageOmni Surgical, LP Dba Spine360 · 2012
Show all 11 generations
  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 10 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 9 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 8 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 7 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 6 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 5 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
  8. 4 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  9. 3 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  10. 2 generations backK080401 Shell Cage, Wave Cage, Loop CageAdvanced Medical Technologies AG · 2008
  11. 1 generation backK082801 Phantom Plus Cage SystemUs Spine · 2008
  12. This deviceK122085 Stingray Cervical CageOmni Surgical, LP Dba Spine360 · 2012
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−11K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−10K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−9K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−8K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−7K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−6K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−5K042930Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc.2004—
−4K062759Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−3K072120Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−2K080401Shell Cage, Wave Cage, Loop CageAdvanced Medical Technologies AG2008—
−1K082801Phantom Plus Cage SystemUs Spine2008—
0 (this device)K122085Stingray Cervical CageOmni Surgical, LP Dba Spine3602012—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199910
200010
200140
200230
200320
200440
200510
200810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K122085, 1984–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K082801Phantom Plus Cage System
Summary page 2
…Phantom Plus Cage BAKe ______________ Stingray 510(k) number -- K082801 P980048 S3 Intended use Per 888.3080 Per 888.3080 Per 888.…
Us Spine2008—
*P980048Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion System
Summary page 1
…Fusion System is substantially equivalent to the following devices. * US Spine Phantom Plus Cage (1(082801) " Zimmer BAK/C Vista Interbody Fusion (P980048 S3) 4. Description of the device: The Stingray Cervical Cage was developed as an intercorporal implant for anterior cervic…
Sulzer Spine-Tech2001—

Also cleared against K082801: 12 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 28 years and passes through 10 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.0 years on median.
  • 2 of the 29 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 12 other devices also cite its predicate K082801.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

The Spine3EO Stingray Cervical Interbody Fusion System is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level. OIDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. The Spine 360 Cervical Interbody Fusion System implants are used to facilitate intervertebral body fusion in the…

Read the full statement (119 words)

The Spine3EO Stingray Cervical Interbody Fusion System is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine with accompanying radicular symptoms at one disc level. OIDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. The Spine 360 Cervical Interbody Fusion System implants are used to facilitate intervertebral body fusion in the cervical spine and are placed via an anterior approach at the C3 to Ti disc levels using autograft bone. The Spine 360 Cervical Interbody Fusion System implants are to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K122085: Stingray Cervical Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K122085

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026