510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Physiological Data Processor

K122763510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 20, 2013283-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2910

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Zephyr Technology Corporation · DRG Transmitters And Receivers, Physiological Signal, Radiofrequency

Cleared on Jun 20, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K113045 (Zephyr Technology Corporation, 2012) after a 283-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1997.

Decided
Jun 20, 2013
Review
283 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DRG
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K962603 (1997). 35 ancestors in all, the oldest K863116 (1986). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2007: 1 other ancestor2005: 3 other ancestors2003: 1 other ancestor2001: 2 other ancestors1996: 3 other ancestors2004: 1 other ancestor2000: 2 other ancestors1999: 2 other ancestors1998: 3 other ancestors1997: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor1993: 1 other ancestor1992: 2 other ancestors1991: 1 other ancestor1989: 1 other ancestor1986: 1 other ancestorK962603 · Masimo Set MS-1 Pulse Oximeter & the Lnop Series of Sensors & Cables · Masimo Corp. · 1997K973887 · Masimo Set MS-1P Pulse Oximeter and the Lnop Series of Sensors and Cables · Masimo Corp. · 1998K982255 · Model 2000 Pulse Oximeter · Ivy Biomedical Systems, Inc. · 1998K991823 · N-395 Pulse Oximeter, Model N-395 · Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Inc. · 1999K012451 · Propaq Encore Models 202, 204, 206; Propaq CS Models 242, 244, 246 · Welch Allyn Protocol, Inc. · 2001K061993 · Equivital, Model EQ-01 · Hidalgo Limited · 2006K100040 · Bioharness · Zephyr Technology Corporation · 2010K113045 · Bioharness · Zephyr Technology Corporation · 20121985199019952000200520102015
  1. Root · 8 generations backK962603 Masimo Set MS-1 Pulse Oximeter & the Lnop Series of Sensors & CablesMasimo Corp. · 1997
  2. 7 generations backK973887 Masimo Set MS-1P Pulse Oximeter and the Lnop Series of Sensors and…Masimo Corp. · 1998
  3. 6 generations backK982255 Model 2000 Pulse OximeterIvy Biomedical Systems, Inc. · 1998
  4. 5 generations backK991823 N-395 Pulse Oximeter, Model N-395Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Inc. · 1999
  5. 4 generations backK012451 Propaq Encore Models 202, 204, 206; Propaq CS Models 242, 244, 246Welch Allyn Protocol, Inc. · 2001
  6. 3 generations backK061993 Equivital, Model EQ-01Hidalgo Limited · 2006
  7. 2 generations backK100040 BioharnessZephyr Technology Corporation · 2010
  8. 1 generation backK113045 BioharnessZephyr Technology Corporation · 2012
  9. This deviceK122763 Physiological Data ProcessorZephyr Technology Corporation · 2013
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K962603Masimo Set MS-1 Pulse Oximeter & the Lnop Series of Sensors & CablesMasimo Corp.1997—
−7K973887Masimo Set MS-1P Pulse Oximeter and the Lnop Series of Sensors and CablesMasimo Corp.1998—
−6K982255Model 2000 Pulse OximeterIvy Biomedical Systems, Inc.1998—
−5K991823N-395 Pulse Oximeter, Model N-395Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Inc.1999—
−4K012451Propaq Encore Models 202, 204, 206; Propaq CS Models 242, 244, 246Welch Allyn Protocol, Inc.2001—
−3K061993Equivital, Model EQ-01Hidalgo Limited2006—
−2K100040BioharnessZephyr Technology Corporation2010—
−1K113045BioharnessZephyr Technology Corporation2012—
0 (this device)K122763Physiological Data ProcessorZephyr Technology Corporation2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198610
198910
199110
199220
199310
199410
199510
199630
199710
199830
199920
200020
200120
200310
200410
200530
200710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K122763, 1997–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DRG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DRG device

  1. #1 K223711 ANNE Onescore 20.8 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K113045Bioharness
Summary page 1
…1 Establishment reglstratlon # 233836 No. . . : . ‘ : : Predicate Device . 'PDP is substantially equivalent to three predicates determined - substantially Equivalent in K113045, BioHarness 3. 1) Firmware (9500.0085). The PDP is a mirror image of the portion of the firmware (PEP) that implements the enco…
Zephyr Technology Corporation2012—

Also cleared against K113045: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • 3 of the 35 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K113045.

How does its category compare?

All DRG devices

DRG Transmitters And Receivers, Physiological Signal, Radiofrequency: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DRG

3in 2025

2007: 62008: 52009: 132010: 102011: 92012: 122013: 132014: 102015: 22016: 22017: 72018: 62019: 52020: 62021: 22022: 62023: 42024: 32025: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 13 (2009) · low 2 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DRG

127in 2025

2007: 63 days median2008: 74 days median2009: 94 days median2010: 68 days median2011: 104 days median2012: 103 days median2013: 146 days median2014: 177 days median2017: 98 days median2018: 220 days median2019: 122 days median2020: 159 days median2022: 287 days median2023: 212 days median2024: 125 days median2025: 127 days median
2007high 287 (2022) · low 63 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DRG

3in 2007

2007: 32026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DRG

52in 2025

2007: 142008: 92009: 52010: 132011: 122012: 92013: 132014: 972015: 1312016: 1822017: 4842018: 1662019: 702020: 822021: 1072022: 432023: 192024: 262025: 52
2007high 484 (2017) · low 5 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DRG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007663314
200857409
2009139405
20101068013
20119104012
20121210309
201313146013
201410177097
20152—0131
20162—0182
20177980484
201862200166
20195122070
20206159082
20212—0107
20226287043
20234212019
20243125026
20253127052
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

The Packet Decoder Process (PDP) is indicated for use as a prescription software device to receive MDDS digital data packets and decode, collate and deliver data to a Class I, MDDS, Enterprise Service Bus according to a proprietary scheme defined by Zephyr Technology.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K122763: Physiological Data Processor.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K122763

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026