510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Imse P-Tlif

K130506510(k) TraditionalCleared May 13, 201375-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Institute of Musculoskeletal Science & Education · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on May 13, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K121254 (Camber Spine Technologies, 2013) and 3 other predicates after a 75-day review. Its family tree reaches back 12 generations to 1984.

Decided
May 13, 2013
Review
75 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 12 generations to K841189 (1984). 52 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 12 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 8 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK082698 Aleutian Ibf SystemK2m, Inc. · 2009
  4. 2 generations backK113138 Aleutian SystemK2m, Inc. · 2012
  5. 1 generation backK121254 Camber Spine Technologies TLS 5.0 Inerbody CageCamber Spine Technologies · 2013
  6. This deviceK130506 Imse P-TlifInstitute of Musculoskeletal Science & Education · 2013
Show all 12 generations
  1. Root · 12 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 11 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 10 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 9 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 8 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 7 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 6 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
  8. 5 generations backK051454 Aleutian Spacer SystemK2m, LLC · 2005
  9. 4 generations backK063399 Aleutian Spacer SystemK2m, Inc. · 2007
  10. 3 generations backK082698 Aleutian Ibf SystemK2m, Inc. · 2009
  11. 2 generations backK113138 Aleutian SystemK2m, Inc. · 2012
  12. 1 generation backK121254 Camber Spine Technologies TLS 5.0 Inerbody CageCamber Spine Technologies · 2013
  13. This deviceK130506 Imse P-TlifInstitute of Musculoskeletal Science & Education · 2013
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−12K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−11K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−10K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−9K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−8K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−7K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−6K042930Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc.2004—
−5K051454Aleutian Spacer SystemK2m, LLC2005—
−4K063399Aleutian Spacer SystemK2m, Inc.2007—
−3K082698Aleutian Ibf SystemK2m, Inc.2009—
−2K113138Aleutian SystemK2m, Inc.2012—
−1K121254Camber Spine Technologies TLS 5.0 Inerbody CageCamber Spine Technologies2013—
0 (this device)K130506Imse P-TlifInstitute of Musculoskeletal Science & Education2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199920
200010
200190
200250
200340
200480
200530
200720
200820
200910
201010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K130506, 1984–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K121254Camber Spine Technologies TLS 5.0 Inerbody CageCamber Spine Technologies2013—
*K073440Foundation Cage
Summary page 2
…lassification Panel: Orthopedic Product Code MAX Reason for 510k New Device Predicate Devices Camber Cage (K1212S4), Corelink Foundation Cage (K 073440), Stryker AVS PL (K(093704) & K2M Aleutian (K(113138) Device Description Institute cf Musculoskeleta…
Corelink, LLC2008—
*K093704Avs PL Peek Spacers
Summary page 2
…MAX Reason for 510k New Device Predicate Devices Camber Cage (K1212S4), Corelink Foundation Cage (K 073440), Stryker AVS PL (K(093704) & K2M Aleutian (K(113138) Device Description Institute cf Musculoskeletal Science and Education, P-TLIF is a device…
Stryker Corp.2009—
*K113138Aleutian System
Summary page 2
…New Device Predicate Devices Camber Cage (K1212S4), Corelink Foundation Cage (K 073440), Stryker AVS PL (K(093704) & K2M Aleutian (K(113138) Device Description Institute cf Musculoskeletal Science and Education, P-TLIF is a device for inter…
K2m, Inc.2012—

Also cleared against K121254: 4 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 29 years and passes through 10 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.6 years on median.
  • 7 of the 52 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K121254.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The Institute of Musculoskeletal Science & Education P-TUIF is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (ODD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from 12-Si. DOD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These ODD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved…

Read the full statement (127 words)

The Institute of Musculoskeletal Science & Education P-TUIF is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (ODD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from 12-Si. DOD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These ODD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). Institute of Musculoskeletal Science & Education P-TLIF is to be used with autologous bone graft and implanted via an open transforaminal or posterior approach.

Institute of Musculoskeletal Science & Education P-TLIF implants are to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K130506: Imse P-Tlif.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K130506

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026