510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Logic Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device

K130641510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 13, 2013186-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Binder Biomedical, Inc. · OVD Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Lumbar

Cleared on Sep 13, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K081395 (Biomet Spine, 2008) and 4 other predicates after a 186-day review. Its family tree reaches back 11 generations to 1984.

Decided
Sep 13, 2013
Review
186 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OVD
Recalls
None
Predicates
5

Its longest line of descent runs back 11 generations to K841189 (1984). 48 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 7 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  4. 2 generations backK080083 Intrepid Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2008 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK073109 Stalif TT Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemSurgicraft, Ltd. · 2008
  6. This deviceK130641 Logic Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceBinder Biomedical, Inc. · 2013
Show all 11 generations
  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 10 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 9 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 8 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 7 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 6 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 5 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
  8. 4 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  9. 3 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  10. 2 generations backK080083 Intrepid Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2008 · Recalled
  11. 1 generation backK073109 Stalif TT Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemSurgicraft, Ltd. · 2008
  12. This deviceK130641 Logic Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceBinder Biomedical, Inc. · 2013
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−11K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−10K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−9K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−8K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−7K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−6K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−5K042930Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc.2004—
−4K062759Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−3K072120Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−2K080083Intrepid Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek20088
−1K073109Stalif TT Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemSurgicraft, Ltd.2008—
0 (this device)K130641Logic Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceBinder Biomedical, Inc.2013—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199920
200010
200150
200250
200320
200450
200520
200730
200870
200910
201010
201210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K130641, 1984–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OVD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OVD device

  1. #1 K222009 aprevo® anterior lumbar interbody fusion…score 26.0 · 23 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (5)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K081395Solitaire Peek-Optima Anterior Spinal SystemBiomet Spine2008—
*K120557Solitarie Peek Anterior Spinal System-to BE Called Colitaire 35Biomet Spine & Bone Healing Technologies2012—
*K093015Binder Intervertebral Body Fusion Device
Summary page 1
…aire PEEK Anterior Spinal System (KO811395 & Kl20557) Binder Intervertebral Body Fusion Device (K093015) Synthes Synflx-LR system (K072253) Centinel Spine STAL…
Binder Biomedical, Inc.2010—
*K072253Synfix-LR Spacer
Summary page 1
…& Kl20557) Binder Intervertebral Body Fusion Device (K093015) Synthes Synflx-LR system (K072253) Centinel Spine STALIF system (K073 109) DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE The LOGIC system consis…
Synthes Spine Co.Lp20071
*K073109Stalif TT Intervertebral Body Fusion System
Summary page 1
…l Body Fusion Device (K093015) Synthes Synflx-LR system (K072253) Centinel Spine STALIF system (K073 109) DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE The LOGIC system consists of a PEEK spacer with titanium bone screws for intervertebral body fusion.…
Surgicraft, Ltd.2008—

Also cleared against K081395: 7 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 29 years and passes through 10 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.0 years on median.
  • 6 of the 48 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 7 other devices also cite its predicate K081395.

How does its category compare?

All OVD devices

OVD Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OVD

10in 2025

2007: 22008: 82009: 32010: 82011: 92012: 102013: 112014: 142015: 122016: 132017: 122018: 142019: 122020: 142021: 72022: 142023: 122024: 122025: 102026 (partial year): 8
2007high 14 (2014) · low 2 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OVD

100in 2025

2008: 84 days median2009: 152 days median2010: 117 days median2011: 167 days median2012: 78 days median2013: 137 days median2014: 139 days median2015: 166 days median2016: 127 days median2017: 127 days median2018: 126 days median2019: 91 days median2020: 91 days median2021: 108 days median2022: 133 days median2023: 92 days median2024: 110 days median2025: 100 days median2026 (partial year): 93 days median
2007high 167 (2011) · low 78 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OVD

1in 2025

2013: 42016: 12021: 12022: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 4 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OVD

50in 2025

2009: 22010: 22011: 62012: 162013: 172014: 352015: 432016: 552017: 722018: 1122019: 1712020: 2032021: 2212022: 742023: 672024: 922025: 50
2007high 221 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OVD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—00
200888400
2009315202
2010811702
2011916706
20121078016
201311137417
201414139035
201512166043
201613127155
201712127072
2018141260112
201912910171
202014910203
202171081221
202214133174
20231292067
202412110092
202510100150
20268931—

What is it indicated for?

The LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is indicated for stand-alone intervertebral body fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (ODD) at one (I1) or two (2) contiguous levels of the lumbasacral spine (L2-S 1). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had at least six (6) months of non-operative…

Read the full statement (118 words)

The LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is indicated for stand-alone intervertebral body fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (ODD) at one (I1) or two (2) contiguous levels of the lumbasacral spine (L2-S 1). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment.

In addition, these patients may have had a previous non-fusion spinal surgery at the involved level(s) and may have had up to a Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s).

The LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is to be used with autogenous bone graft material.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K130641: Logic Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K130641

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026