510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Frag-Loc System

K130986510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 23, 2013105-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3030

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Acumed, LLC · HTN Washer, Bolt Nut

Cleared on Jul 23, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K982354 (Special Devices, Inc., 1998) after a 105-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1998.

Decided
Jul 23, 2013
Review
105 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HTN
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K982354 (1998). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 1 generation backK982354 SD Trans-Osseous Fastener Models Tob 6 Bolt 32/50, Tob 6 Bolt 50/80…Special Devices, Inc. · 1998
  2. This deviceK130986 Frag-Loc SystemAcumed, LLC · 2013
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K982354SD Trans-Osseous Fastener Models Tob 6 Bolt 32/50, Tob 6 Bolt 50/80, Tob 6…Special Devices, Inc.1998—
0 (this device)K130986Frag-Loc SystemAcumed, LLC2013—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K130986, 1998–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HTN? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HTN device

  1. #1 K201522 Arthrex Syndesmosis TightRope XP Buttress…score 16.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K982354SD Trans-Osseous Fastener Models Tob 6 Bolt 32/50, Tob 6 Bolt 50/80, Tob 6 Bolt 80/140…
Summary page 1
…for the fixation of fractures, fusions, or osteotomies. Predicate Device: The subject Frag-Loc®)System is substantially equivalent to the predicate Trans-Osseous Bolt (K982354) with respect to intended use, geometry, and method of fixation. Although the materials in these systems differ, both are made of…
Special Devices, Inc.1998—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.

How does its category compare?

All HTN devices

HTN Washer, Bolt Nut: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HTN

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 22009: 32011: 42013: 32014: 82015: 22016: 12017: 62018: 22019: 52020: 32021: 22022: 52023: 22024: 62025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 8 (2014) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HTN

75in 2025

2009: 86 days median2011: 130 days median2013: 105 days median2014: 98 days median2017: 88 days median2019: 116 days median2020: 87 days median2022: 86 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 75 days median
2007high 130 (2011) · low 75 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HTN

1in 2019

2013: 12019: 1
2007high 1 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HTN

190in 2025

2007: 142008: 112009: 222010: 172011: 122012: 692013: 452014: 332015: 352016: 432017: 302018: 482019: 532020: 812021: 1492022: 852023: 1082024: 2692025: 190
2007high 269 (2024) · low 11 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HTN, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—014
20082—011
2009386022
20100—017
20114130012
20120—069
20133105145
2014898033
20152—035
20161—043
2017688030
20182—048
20195116153
2020387081
20212—0149
2022586085
20232—0108
20246900269
20254750190
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Frag-Loc®&System is intended to provide compression to bones and bone fragments

for the fixation of fractures, fusions, or osteotomies.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K130986: Frag-Loc System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K130986

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026