510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Midline (TM)

K133286510(k) SpecialCleared Jan 9, 201476-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Centinel Spine, Inc. · OVD Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Lumbar

Cleared on Jan 9, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K101301 (Centinel Spine, 2010) and 2 other predicates after a 76-day review. Its family tree reaches back 13 generations to 1984. 1 of the 516 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 460 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jan 9, 2014
Review
76 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OVD
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 13 generations to K841189 (1984). 55 ancestors in all. 460 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly. 1 of the 516 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2010: 1 other ancestor2009: 1 other ancestor2008: 6 other ancestors2005: 3 other ancestors2004: 6 other ancestors1999: 2 other ancestors2007: 5 other ancestors2003: 3 other ancestors2002: 5 other ancestors2001: 7 other ancestors2000: 1 other ancestor1996: 2 other ancestors2014: 1 descendant cleared2015: 4 descendants cleared2017: 12 descendants cleared2016: 11 descendants cleared2018: 21 descendants cleared2019: 31 descendants cleared2021: 42 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12025: 61 descendants cleared2020: 39 descendants cleared2022: 53 descendants cleared2023: 57 descendants cleared2024: 78 descendants cleared2026: 50 descendants clearedK841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K022793 (2003), K031757 (2003) ×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K041888 (2004), K042930 (2004) K062759 · Paramount VBR System · Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007K072120 · Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion Device · Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K080083 (2008), K073109 (2008) K083475 · Lucent Magnum · Spinal Elements, Inc. · 2009K101310 · VU Apod Intervertebral Body Fusion Device · Theken Spine, LLC · 201019801990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 7 other ancestors3 generations back: 14 other ancestors4 generations back: 8 other ancestors5 generations back: 5 other ancestors6 generations back: 4 other ancestors7 generations back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 4 descendants3 generations forward: 22 descendants4 generations forward: 75 descendants5 generations forward: 101 descendants, 1 with a Class I recall16 generations forward: 129 descendants7 generations forward: 93 descendants8 generations forward: 27 descendants9 generations forward: 5 descendants10 generations forward: 2 descendants11 generations forward: 1 descendant K101310 · VU Apod Intervertebral Body Fusion Device · Theken Spine, LLC · 2010K083475 · Lucent Magnum · Spinal Elements, Inc. · 2009K073109 · Stalif TT Intervertebral Body Fusion System · Surgicraft, Ltd. · 2008K080083 · Intrepid Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek · 2008 · recalledK072120 · Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion Device · Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007K062759 · Paramount VBR System · Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007K042930 · Spacevision Cage System · Spine Vision, Inc. · 2004K041888 · Curved Peek Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004K031757 · Peek Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medical, LLC · 2003K022793 · Tetris Spinal Implant · Signus Medical, LLC · 2003K003043 · Surgical Titanium Mesh System · Depuyacromed · 2001K990148 · Stackable Cage System · Depuy Motech Acromed · 1999K841189 · Oec/Rezaian Spinal Fixator · Orthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984−10−50+5+10
  1. Root · 13 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 9 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK073109 Stalif TT Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemSurgicraft, Ltd. · 2008
  4. 2 generations backK083475 Lucent MagnumSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2009
  5. 1 generation backK101310 VU Apod Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceTheken Spine, LLC · 2010
  6. This deviceK133286 Midline (TM)Centinel Spine, Inc. · 2014
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 459 of its ownK141942 Midline II TICentinel Spine, Inc. · 2014
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 368 of its ownK150643 Centinel Spine STALIF TT, STALIF MIDLINE, MIDLINE II, MIDLINE II-TiCentinel Spine, Inc. · 2015
  9. Descendant · 3 generations on · 236 of its ownK152475 FORZA PTC Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2016
  10. Descendant · 2 generations on · 220 of its ownK151214 ALIF Interfixated SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015
  11. Descendant · 3 generations on · 189 of its ownK153495 Avenue L Lateral Lumbar Cage, Avenue T TLIF Cage System, ROI-A ALIF…Ldr Spine USA · 2016 · Recalled
Show all 13 generations
  1. Root · 13 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 12 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 11 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 10 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 9 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 8 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 7 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
  8. 6 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  9. 5 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  10. 4 generations backK080083 Intrepid Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2008 · Recalled
  11. 3 generations backK073109 Stalif TT Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemSurgicraft, Ltd. · 2008
  12. 2 generations backK083475 Lucent MagnumSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2009
  13. 1 generation backK101310 VU Apod Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceTheken Spine, LLC · 2010
  14. This deviceK133286 Midline (TM)Centinel Spine, Inc. · 2014

Showing 5 of 460 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2014: 12015: 42016: 112017: 122018: 212019: 312020: 392021: 422022: 532023: 572024: 782025: 612026: 50
2014high 78 (2024) · low 1 (2014)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 460 · See all
  • K141942Midline II TICentinel Spine, Inc. · 2014 · cites it directly459descendants
  • K150643Centinel Spine STALIF TT, STALIF MIDLINE, MIDLINE II, MIDLINE II-TiCentinel Spine, Inc. · 2015 · 2 generations on368descendants
  • K152475FORZA PTC Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc. · 2016 · 3 generations on236descendants
  • K151214ALIF Interfixated SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015 · 2 generations on220descendants
  • K153495Avenue L Lateral Lumbar Cage, Avenue T TLIF Cage System, ROI-A ALIF Cage System, ROI-T…Ldr Spine USA · 2016 · 3 generations on189descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−13K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−12K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−11K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−10K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−9K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−8K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−7K042930Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc.2004—
−6K062759Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−5K072120Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−4K080083Intrepid Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek20088
−3K073109Stalif TT Intervertebral Body Fusion SystemSurgicraft, Ltd.2008—
−2K083475Lucent MagnumSpinal Elements, Inc.2009—
−1K101310VU Apod Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceTheken Spine, LLC2010—
0 (this device)K133286Midline (TM)Centinel Spine, Inc.2014—
+1K141942Midline II TICentinel Spine, Inc.2014—
+2K150643Centinel Spine STALIF TT, STALIF MIDLINE, MIDLINE II, MIDLINE II-TiCentinel Spine, Inc.2015—
+3K152475FORZA PTC Spacer SystemOrthofix, Inc.2016—
+2K151214ALIF Interfixated SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated2015—
+3K153495Avenue L Lateral Lumbar Cage, Avenue T TLIF Cage System, ROI-A ALIF Cage…Ldr Spine USA20161

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199920
200010
200170
200250
200330
200460
200530
200750
200860
200910
201010

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201410
201540
2016110
2017120
2018210
2019310
2020390
2021421
2022530
2023570
2024780
2025610
2026500
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K133286, 1984–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OVD device

  1. #1 K222009 aprevo® anterior lumbar interbody fusion…score 26.0 · 23 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K101301Stalif Midline
Summary page 1
…e and unicortical cancellous bone screws intended to be used without supplemental fixation. The purpose of this 510(k) is to modify the STALIFTM TT and STALIF MIDLINETM (K101301, K073 109) to include modified geometries.…
Centinel Spine2010—
*K073109Stalif TT Intervertebral Body Fusion System
Summary page 1
…cortical cancellous bone screws intended to be used without supplemental fixation. The purpose of this 510(k) is to modify the STALIFTM TT and STALIF MIDLINETM (K101301, K073 109) to include modified geometries.…
Surgicraft, Ltd.2008—
*K101310VU Apod Intervertebral Body Fusion Device
Summary page 2
…2 of 2 Predicate Device(s): MIDLINETM was shown to be substantially equivalent to the previously cleared STALIFTM devices.(K101301, K073109) and Theken Spine Vu aPOD (K101310) and has the same indications for use, design, function, and materials used. Performance Standards: Testing performed indicate t…
Theken Spine, LLC2010—

Also cleared against K101301: 8 other devices →

What descends from it? (460)

See all 460

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K141942Midline II TICentinel Spine, Inc.2014459

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 5 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 30 years and passes through 12 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.0 years on median.
  • 11 of the 55 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K141942 (Centinel Spine, Inc., 2014) has gone furthest, with 459 descendants of its own.
  • 8 other devices also cite its predicate K101301.

How does its category compare?

All OVD devices

OVD Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OVD

10in 2025

2007: 22008: 82009: 32010: 82011: 92012: 102013: 112014: 142015: 122016: 132017: 122018: 142019: 122020: 142021: 72022: 142023: 122024: 122025: 102026 (partial year): 8
2007high 14 (2014) · low 2 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OVD

100in 2025

2008: 84 days median2009: 152 days median2010: 117 days median2011: 167 days median2012: 78 days median2013: 137 days median2014: 139 days median2015: 166 days median2016: 127 days median2017: 127 days median2018: 126 days median2019: 91 days median2020: 91 days median2021: 108 days median2022: 133 days median2023: 92 days median2024: 110 days median2025: 100 days median2026 (partial year): 93 days median
2007high 167 (2011) · low 78 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OVD

1in 2025

2013: 42016: 12021: 12022: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 4 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OVD

50in 2025

2009: 22010: 22011: 62012: 162013: 172014: 352015: 432016: 552017: 722018: 1122019: 1712020: 2032021: 2212022: 742023: 672024: 922025: 50
2007high 221 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OVD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—00
200888400
2009315202
2010811702
2011916706
20121078016
201311137417
201414139035
201512166043
201613127155
201712127072
2018141260112
201912910171
202014910203
202171081221
202214133174
20231292067
202412110092
202510100150
20268931—

What is it indicated for?

The MIDLINETM is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of…

Read the full statement (136 words)

The MIDLINETM is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved levels. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at the treated level may be treated. These implants may be implanted via a laparoscopic or an open anterior approach.

The MIDLINETM is a stand-alone system intended to be used with the bone screws provided and requires no additional supplementary fixation systems.

The MIDLINETM system must be used with bone grafting material (autograft only).

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K133286: Midline (TM).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K133286

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026