510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2015

BD Viper LT System

K140447510(k) TraditionalCleared May 20, 201488-day reviewClass II21 CFR 862.2570Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Becton, Dickinson and Company · OOI Real Time Nucleic Acid Amplification System

Cleared on May 20, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K081825 (Becton, Dickinson & CO, 2008) after an 88-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2001. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
May 20, 2014
Review
88 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OOI
Recalls
2
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K003395 (2001). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK003395 Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 AssayGen-Probe, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
  2. 1 generation backK081825 BD Probetec Neisseria Gonorrhoeae (GC) Q Amplified Dna AssayBecton, Dickinson & CO · 2008 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK140447 BD Viper LT SystemBecton, Dickinson and Company · 2014
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K003395Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 AssayGen-Probe, Inc.20011
−1K081825BD Probetec Neisseria Gonorrhoeae (GC) Q Amplified Dna AssayBecton, Dickinson & CO20081
0 (this device)K140447BD Viper LT SystemBecton, Dickinson and Company2014—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K140447, 2001–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OOI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OOI device

  1. #1 K243922 Revogenescore 9.6 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K081825BD Probetec Neisseria Gonorrhoeae (GC) Q Amplified Dna Assay
Summary page 1
…for clinical multiplex test systems Regulation Number 862.2570 Product Code 001 Predicate Devices BD Viper Tm System (K08 1825) Device Description The BD Viper LT System is a table-top instrument that is designed to be fully contained on a standard labo…
Becton, Dickinson & CO20081

Also cleared against K081825: 6 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 14, 2015Class IIZ-1866-2017Software designBD has confirmed reports that lower than expected RFU values were generated on customer BD Viper LT Systems after the installation of software version 3.00H. As RFU values decrease, results approach the assay cutoff threshold which has…
Nov 7, 2014Class IIZ-1816-2015Device DesignPotential for false positive Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) results and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) results when processing the CT Qx and GC Qx Assays on the BD Viper LT Instrument.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.6 years on median.
  • 2 of the 2 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 6 other devices also cite its predicate K081825.

How does its category compare?

All OOI devices

OOI Real Time Nucleic Acid Amplification System: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OOI

1in 2025

2010: 32012: 12013: 12014: 12015: 22016: 22017: 12022: 12023: 12025: 1
2007high 3 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OOI

249in 2010

2010: 249 days median
2007high 249 (2010)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OOI

1in 2024

2010: 12011: 22013: 12021: 42022: 42023: 12024: 1
2007high 4 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OOI

524in 2025

2011: 52012: 32013: 12014: 52015: 12016: 32019: 22020: 1342021: 3242022: 8742023: 2202024: 3272025: 524
2007high 874 (2022) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OOI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
2010324910
20110—25
20121—03
20131—11
20141—05
20152—01
20162—03
20171—00
20180—00
20190—02
20200—0134
20210—4324
20221—4874
20231—1220
20240—1327
20251—0524
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The BD Viper LT System is intended for in vitro diagnostic (IVD) use in clinical laboratories to perform automated extraction of nucleic acids from multiple specimen types, amplification of target nucleic acid sequences by Strand Displacement Amplification (SDA) and detection of amplified nucleic acid using a two color fluorescence detection system. The BD Viper LT is for use only with in vitro diagnostic tests labeled for use on the system.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K140447: BD Viper LT System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K140447

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026