510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

BN Lumbar Cage System

K140564510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 5, 201492-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medyssey USA, Inc. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Jun 5, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K110067 (Medyssey Co, Ltd., 2011) and 1 other predicate after a 92-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1996. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 5, 2014
Review
92 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to P950002 (1996). 7 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2009: 1 other ancestor1999: 2 other ancestors2001: 1 other ancestor2017: 2 descendants cleared2021: 1 descendant clearedP950002 · Bak Interbody Fusion System · Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 1996K072226 · Impix Spacer · Medicrea Technologies · 2007K110067 · LP Cage · Medyssey Co, Ltd. · 20111995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant K110067 · LP Cage · Medyssey Co, Ltd. · 2011K072226 · Impix Spacer · Medicrea Technologies · 2007P950002 · Bak Interbody Fusion System · Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 19960
  1. Root · 3 generations backP950002 Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc. · 1996
  2. 2 generations backK072226 Impix SpacerMedicrea Technologies · 2007
  3. 1 generation backK110067 LP CageMedyssey Co, Ltd. · 2011
  4. This deviceK140564 BN Lumbar Cage SystemMedyssey USA, Inc. · 2014
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK172756 Varian cageMedyssey USA, Inc. · 2017
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK203327 VERTACONNECT TLIF CageSignus Medizintechnik · 2021
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK170389 TAURUS PEEK Cage SystemMedyssey USA, Inc. · 2017

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K172756Varian cageMedyssey USA, Inc. · 2017 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K203327VERTACONNECT TLIF CageSignus Medizintechnik · 2021 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K170389TAURUS PEEK Cage SystemMedyssey USA, Inc. · 2017 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3P950002Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc.1996—
−2K072226Impix SpacerMedicrea Technologies2007—
−1K110067LP CageMedyssey Co, Ltd.2011—
0 (this device)K140564BN Lumbar Cage SystemMedyssey USA, Inc.2014—
+1K172756Varian cageMedyssey USA, Inc.2017—
+2K203327VERTACONNECT TLIF CageSignus Medizintechnik2021—
+1K170389TAURUS PEEK Cage SystemMedyssey USA, Inc.2017—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199920
200110
200910

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201720
202110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K140564, 1996–2021Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K110067LP Cage
Summary page 1
…lassification Name: 87 MAX- Orthosis, intervertebral body fusion device, 21 CFR 888.3080, Class 11 Predicate Device: The predicate devices include the Medyssey LP Cage (K110067) and the Stryker AVS Spacer (K093704). Product Description: The Medyssey BN Cage is designed to provide mechanical support while…
Medyssey Co, Ltd.2011—
*K093704Avs PL Peek Spacers
Summary page 1
…intervertebral body fusion device, 21 CFR 888.3080, Class 11 Predicate Device: The predicate devices include the Medyssey LP Cage (K110067) and the Stryker AVS Spacer (K093704). Product Description: The Medyssey BN Cage is designed to provide mechanical support while biologic fusion takes place. The sys…
Stryker Corp.2009—

Also cleared against K110067: 4 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K172756Varian cageMedyssey USA, Inc.20171
K170389TAURUS PEEK Cage SystemMedyssey USA, Inc.20170

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 18 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.3 years on median.
  • 1 of the 7 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K172756 (Medyssey USA, Inc., 2017) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K110067.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The BIN Cage is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the devices. The device must be used with supplemental fixation. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). It is indicated to be used with autograft bane.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K140564: BN Lumbar Cage System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K140564

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026