510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

LP Cage

K110067510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 8, 201188-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medyssey Co, Ltd. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Apr 8, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K072226 (Medicrea Technologies, 2007) after an 88-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1996. 15 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 8, 2011
Review
88 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to P950002 (1996). 5 ancestors in all. 15 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2001: 1 other ancestor1999: 2 other ancestors2014: 4 descendants cleared2022: 2 descendants cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2017: 3 descendants cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant clearedP950002 · Bak Interbody Fusion System · Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 1996K072226 · Impix Spacer · Medicrea Technologies · 20071995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 5 descendants2 generations forward: 7 descendants3 generations forward: 3 descendants K072226 · Impix Spacer · Medicrea Technologies · 2007P950002 · Bak Interbody Fusion System · Zimmer Spine, Inc. · 19960
  1. Root · 2 generations backP950002 Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc. · 1996
  2. 1 generation backK072226 Impix SpacerMedicrea Technologies · 2007
  3. This deviceK110067 LP CageMedyssey Co, Ltd. · 2011
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 6 of its ownK120464 Innesis Peek CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd. · 2013
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK170341 Medussa-PL CageMedyssey USA, Inc. · 2017
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK140564 BN Lumbar Cage SystemMedyssey USA, Inc. · 2014
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK140577 Innesis Peek TL CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd. · 2014
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK121246 Medyssy LT Cage SystemMedyssey Co, Ltd. · 2012

Showing 5 of 15 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2012: 12013: 12014: 42017: 32018: 22020: 12021: 12022: 2
2012high 4 (2014) · low 0 (2015)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 15 · See all
  • K120464Innesis Peek CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd. · 2013 · cites it directly6descendants
  • K170341Medussa-PL CageMedyssey USA, Inc. · 2017 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K140564BN Lumbar Cage SystemMedyssey USA, Inc. · 2014 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K140577Innesis Peek TL CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd. · 2014 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K121246Medyssy LT Cage SystemMedyssey Co, Ltd. · 2012 · cites it directly2descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2P950002Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc.1996—
−1K072226Impix SpacerMedicrea Technologies2007—
0 (this device)K110067LP CageMedyssey Co, Ltd.2011—
+1K120464Innesis Peek CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd.2013—
+1K170341Medussa-PL CageMedyssey USA, Inc.2017—
+1K140564BN Lumbar Cage SystemMedyssey USA, Inc.2014—
+2K140577Innesis Peek TL CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd.2014—
+1K121246Medyssy LT Cage SystemMedyssey Co, Ltd.2012—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199920
200110

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
201310
201440
201730
201820
202010
202110
202220
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K110067, 1996–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K072226Impix Spacer
Summary page 1
…redicate Devices The LP Cage was shown to be substantially equivalentto legally marketed predicate devices. The predicate device for the Medyssey LIP Cage isthe IMPIX L (K072226). Indications for Use The LIP Cage® is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at…
Medicrea Technologies2007—

Also cleared against K072226: 10 other devices →

What descends from it? (15)

See all 15

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K120464Innesis Peek CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd.20136
K170341Medussa-PL CageMedyssey USA, Inc.20174
K140564BN Lumbar Cage SystemMedyssey USA, Inc.20143
K121246Medyssy LT Cage SystemMedyssey Co, Ltd.20122
K223654Medussa-PL CageMedyssey USA, Inc.20220

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 11.2 years on median.
  • 1 of the 5 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K120464 (Bk Meditech, Co., Ltd., 2013) has gone furthest, with 6 descendants of its own.
  • 10 other devices also cite its predicate K072226.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The LP Cage is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the devices. The device must be used with supplemental fixation. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). It is indicated to be used with autograft bone.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K110067: LP Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K110067

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026