510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Caiman Seal and Cut Technology

K140839510(k) SpecialCleared Apr 28, 201426-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4400

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Aesculap, Inc. · GEI Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories

Cleared on Apr 28, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K130596 (Aesculap, Inc., 2013) after a 26-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1994. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Apr 28, 2014
Review
26 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEI
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K932293 (1994). 19 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 8 generations backK932293 Cabot Medical Bipolar Cutting ForcepsCabot Medical Corp. · 1994 · Recalled
  2. 7 generations backK981916 Ligasure Vessel Sealing SystemValleylab, Inc. · 1998
  3. 6 generations backK031011 Ligasure 5MM Laparoscopic Sealer-Divider, Model LS1500Valleylab, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  4. 5 generations backK041587 Ligasure Precise Model #LS1200/Ligasure 5MM Laparoscopic Sealer…Valleylab · 2004
  5. 4 generations backK081312 Aragon Oneshot SystemAragon Surgical, Inc. · 2008
  6. 3 generations backK090306 Aragon Surgical RF System L2 InstrumentAragon Surgical, Inc. · 2009
  7. 2 generations backK093075 Aragon Surgical RF System Teleo InstrumentAragon Surgical, Inc. · 2010 · Recalled
  8. 1 generation backK130596 Caiman Seal and Cut TechnologyAesculap, Inc. · 2013
  9. This deviceK140839 Caiman Seal and Cut TechnologyAesculap, Inc. · 2014
  10. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK151858 Caiman Seal and Cut TechnologyAesculap, Inc. · 2015 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K151858Caiman Seal and Cut TechnologyAesculap, Inc. · 2015 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K932293Cabot Medical Bipolar Cutting ForcepsCabot Medical Corp.19943
−7K981916Ligasure Vessel Sealing SystemValleylab, Inc.1998—
−6K031011Ligasure 5MM Laparoscopic Sealer-Divider, Model LS1500Valleylab, Inc.20032
−5K041587Ligasure Precise Model #LS1200/Ligasure 5MM Laparoscopic Sealer Divider Model…Valleylab2004—
−4K081312Aragon Oneshot SystemAragon Surgical, Inc.2008—
−3K090306Aragon Surgical RF System L2 InstrumentAragon Surgical, Inc.2009—
−2K093075Aragon Surgical RF System Teleo InstrumentAragon Surgical, Inc.20102
−1K130596Caiman Seal and Cut TechnologyAesculap, Inc.2013—
0 (this device)K140839Caiman Seal and Cut TechnologyAesculap, Inc.2014—
+1K151858Caiman Seal and Cut TechnologyAesculap, Inc.20151

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199540
199610
200120
200510
200710
200910
201110

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K140839, 1994–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEI device

  1. #1 K231790 The InMode System with the Morpheus8 Applicatorsscore 32.7 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K130596Caiman Seal and Cut Technology
Summary page 1
…4400 PRODUCT CODE: GEl SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE Caiman Seal and Cut Technology is substantially equivalent to Caiman Seal and Cut Technology cleared via K 130596. DEVICE DESCRIPTION Caiman Seal and Cut Technology consists of the Lektrafuse RF Generator and the sterile, single use Caiman de…
Aesculap, Inc.2013—

Also cleared against K130596: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K151858Caiman Seal and Cut TechnologyAesculap, Inc.20150

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 20 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.2 years on median.
  • 5 of the 19 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K151858 (Aesculap, Inc., 2015) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K130596.

How does its category compare?

All GEI devices

GEI Electrosurgical, Cutting & Coagulation & Accessories: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GEI

52in 2025

2007: 502008: 612009: 422010: 462011: 352012: 392013: 482014: 492015: 472016: 642017: 522018: 472019: 482020: 592021: 462022: 552023: 652024: 592025: 522026 (partial year): 43
2007high 65 (2023) · low 35 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEI

113in 2025

2007: 51 days median2008: 71 days median2009: 130 days median2010: 109 days median2011: 135 days median2012: 133 days median2013: 136 days median2014: 103 days median2015: 123 days median2016: 108 days median2017: 72 days median2018: 93 days median2019: 93 days median2020: 105 days median2021: 146 days median2022: 150 days median2023: 104 days median2024: 125 days median2025: 113 days median2026 (partial year): 183 days median
2007high 183 (2026) · low 51 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEI

4in 2025

2007: 212008: 192009: 272010: 512011: 322012: 302013: 132014: 32015: 42016: 32017: 22018: 62019: 52020: 12021: 62022: 492023: 27, 4 Class I2024: 22, 10 Class I2025: 42026 (partial year): 8
2007high 51 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (14 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEI

7,592in 2025

2007: 2,7952008: 2,5562009: 3,5912010: 3,3772011: 4,4632012: 5,2162013: 4,8972014: 4,9082015: 4,9362016: 5,6162017: 6,0732018: 6,5452019: 7,0672020: 6,4902021: 6,3542022: 6,1032023: 7,1762024: 7,8972025: 7,592
2007high 7,897 (2024) · low 2,556 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20075051212,795
20086171192,556
200942130273,591
201046109513,377
201135135324,463
201239133305,216
201348136134,897
20144910334,908
20154712344,936
20166410835,616
2017527226,073
2018479366,545
2019489357,067
20205910516,490
20214614666,354
202255150496,103
20236510427 (4)7,176
20245912522 (10)7,897
20255211347,592
2026431838—

What is it indicated for?

Caiman Seal and Cut Technology consists of dedicated bipolar electrosurgical instruments intended for use in general surgery and gynecologic surgical procedures where ligation and division of vessels is desired. The instruments create a seal by the application of bipolar clectrosurgicall RE energy (coagulation) to vascular structure (vessels) interposed between thejaws of te device. A cutting blade is actuated for the division of tissue. The Caimnan 12…

Read the full statement (196 words)

Caiman Seal and Cut Technology consists of dedicated bipolar electrosurgical instruments intended for use in general surgery and gynecologic surgical procedures where ligation and division of vessels is desired. The instruments create a seal by the application of bipolar clectrosurgicall RE energy (coagulation) to vascular structure (vessels) interposed between thejaws of te device. A cutting blade is actuated for the division of tissue.

The Caimnan 12 Plus (44cm) and the Caiman 5 are indicated for laparoscopic procedures and the Cainman 12 Plus (24cm) is indicated for open procedures. The indications for use include general surgical procedures, (including urologic, vascular, thoracic, and thoracoscopic), and gynecological procedures where ligation and division of vessels is performed. These procedures include: vaginal hysterectomies, Nissen fuandoplication, colectomy, adhesiolysis, bowel resection, and oophorectomny etc., or any procedure where vessel ligation (seal and cut), tissue grasping, and dissection is performed. The devices can be used on vessels up to and including 7mm and bundles as large as will fit in the jaws of the instrument.

Caiman Seal and Cut Technology has not been shown to be effective for tubal sterilization or tubal coagulation for sterilization procedures. Do not use the system for these procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K140839: Caiman Seal and Cut Technology.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K140839

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026