510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Manipulator; Manipulator Pro

K142164510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 17, 2014133-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.4530

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Gynetech Pty., Ltd. · LKF Cannula, Manipulator/Injector, Uterine

Cleared on Dec 17, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K071907 (Conmed Corporation, 2007) after a 133-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1996. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Dec 17, 2014
Review
133 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LKF
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K955446 (1996). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2015: 1 descendant clearedK955446 · Conmed Vcare Retractor/Elevator · Conmedcorp · 1996 · recalledK071907 · Vcare Retractor/Elevator · Conmed Corporation · 2007 · recalled1995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K071907 · Vcare Retractor/Elevator · Conmed Corporation · 2007 · recalledK955446 · Conmed Vcare Retractor/Elevator · Conmedcorp · 1996 · recalled0
  1. Root · 2 generations backK955446 Conmed Vcare Retractor/ElevatorConmedcorp · 1996 · Recalled
  2. 1 generation backK071907 Vcare Retractor/ElevatorConmed Corporation · 2007 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK142164 Manipulator; Manipulator ProGynetech Pty., Ltd. · 2014
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK150519 ManipulatOR PRO, ManipulatORGynetech Pty., Ltd. · 2015

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K150519ManipulatOR PRO, ManipulatORGynetech Pty., Ltd. · 2015 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K955446Conmed Vcare Retractor/ElevatorConmedcorp19963
−1K071907Vcare Retractor/ElevatorConmed Corporation20074
0 (this device)K142164Manipulator; Manipulator ProGynetech Pty., Ltd.2014—
+1K150519ManipulatOR PRO, ManipulatORGynetech Pty., Ltd.2015—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K142164, 1996–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LKF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LKF device

  1. #1 K241693 FemChec Controlled Saline-Air Device (FCD-250)score 11.6 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K071907Vcare Retractor/Elevator
Summary page 4
…evices: Primary Predicate Device: ConMed, VCare Vaginal-­‐Cervical Ahluwalia’s Retractor-­‐Elevator, K071907 Device Description: The ManipulatOR and ManipulatOR PRO are sterile, single-­‐use…
Conmed Corporation20074

Also cleared against K071907: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K150519ManipulatOR PRO, ManipulatORGynetech Pty., Ltd.20150

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 18 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 11.3 years on median.
  • 2 of the 2 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K150519 (Gynetech Pty., Ltd., 2015) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K071907.

How does its category compare?

All LKF devices

LKF Cannula, Manipulator/Injector, Uterine: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LKF

2in 2025

2007: 32009: 22010: 62011: 32013: 32014: 32015: 52016: 12017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 42024: 32025: 2
2007high 6 (2010) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LKF

136in 2024

2007: 141 days median2010: 178 days median2011: 187 days median2013: 266 days median2014: 169 days median2015: 140 days median2018: 267 days median2022: 79 days median2024: 136 days median
2007high 267 (2018) · low 79 (2022)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LKF

3in 2022

2008: 22012: 22022: 3
2007high 3 (2022) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LKF

95in 2025

2007: 362008: 592009: 532010: 462011: 982012: 1042013: 532014: 452015: 532016: 622017: 642018: 232019: 762020: 1192021: 1892022: 1002023: 882024: 1252025: 95
2007high 189 (2021) · low 23 (2018)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LKF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20073141036
20080—259
20092—053
20106178046
20113187098
20120—2104
20133266053
20143169045
20155140053
20161—062
20171—064
20184267023
20191—076
20200—0119
20210—0189
20224793100
20230—088
202431360125
20252—095
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The ManipulatOR is indicated for manipulation of the uterus during laparoscopic procedures including laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), laparoscopic tubal occlusion, and diagnostic laparoscopy. The ManipulatOR, when used together with the McCartney Tube, is indicated for manipulation of the uterus during laparoscopic procedures requiring maintenance of pneumoperitoneum, such as total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). The ManipulatOR PRO is…

Read the full statement (96 words)

The ManipulatOR is indicated for manipulation of the uterus during laparoscopic procedures including laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), laparoscopic tubal occlusion, and diagnostic laparoscopy. The ManipulatOR, when used together with the McCartney Tube, is indicated for manipulation of the uterus during laparoscopic procedures requiring maintenance of pneumoperitoneum, such as total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).

The ManipulatOR PRO is indicated for manipulation of the uterus during laparoscopic procedures such as laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), laparoscopic tubal occlusion and diagnostic laparoscopy. The ManipulatOR PRO maintains pneumoperitoneum by sealing the vagina once colpotomy is performed.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K142164: Manipulator; Manipulator Pro.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K142164

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026