510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2015

EXPEDIUM Spine System/Synapse System

K142460510(k) SpecialCleared Oct 1, 201429-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3050Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Johnson and Johnson · KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal

Cleared on Oct 1, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K091689 (Synthes (Usa), 2009) and 2 other predicates after a 29-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1999. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Oct 1, 2014
Review
29 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KWP
Recalls
1
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K990745 (1999). 19 ancestors in all, the oldest K963045 (1997). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2012: 1 other ancestor2009: 2 other ancestors2007: 1 other ancestor2005: 1 other ancestor2003: 3 other ancestors2002: 1 other ancestor2000: 2 other ancestors1997: 1 other ancestor2001: 2 other ancestorsK990745 · Modification to Synthes Universal Spinal System · Synthes Spine · 1999K992739 · Click'x · Synthes Spine · 2000 · recalledK052123 · Synthes Pangea System · Synthes (Usa) · 2005K082572 · Uss Iliosacral, Uss Polyaxial · Synthes Spine · 2008K100634 · Synthes Matrix System · Synthes (Usa) · 201019952000200520102015
  1. Root · 5 generations backK990745 Modification to Synthes Universal Spinal SystemSynthes Spine · 1999
  2. 4 generations backK992739 Click'xSynthes Spine · 2000 · Recalled
  3. 3 generations backK052123 Synthes Pangea SystemSynthes (Usa) · 2005
  4. 2 generations backK082572 Uss Iliosacral, Uss PolyaxialSynthes Spine · 2008
  5. 1 generation backK100634 Synthes Matrix SystemSynthes (Usa) · 2010
  6. This deviceK142460 EXPEDIUM Spine System/Synapse SystemJohnson and Johnson · 2014
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K990745Modification to Synthes Universal Spinal SystemSynthes Spine1999—
−4K992739Click'xSynthes Spine20001
−3K052123Synthes Pangea SystemSynthes (Usa)2005—
−2K082572Uss Iliosacral, Uss PolyaxialSynthes Spine2008—
−1K100634Synthes Matrix SystemSynthes (Usa)2010—
0 (this device)K142460EXPEDIUM Spine System/Synapse SystemJohnson and Johnson2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
200020
200120
200210
200330
200510
200710
200920
201210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K142460, 1999–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KWP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K091689Synapse System 4.0MM, OC Fusion System 4.0MM
Summary page 5
…MNH; Orthopedic D. Predicate Device Name Trade names: Primary Predicate: Synthes Synapse System (most recently cleared K091689) Additional Predicate: DePuy EXPEDIUM Spine System (most recently cleared K111136)…
Synthes (Usa)2009—
*K111136Expedium Spine System, Viper System, Viper 2 System
Summary page 5
…System (most recently cleared K091689) Additional Predicate: DePuy EXPEDIUM Spine System (most recently cleared K111136) Additional Predicate: Synthes Matrix Spine System (K100634)…
Depuy Spine, Inc.20121
*K100634Synthes Matrix System
Summary page 5
…dditional Predicate: DePuy EXPEDIUM Spine System (most recently cleared K111136) Additional Predicate: Synthes Matrix Spine System (K100634) K142460…
Synthes (Usa)2010—

Also cleared against K091689: 5 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Apr 21, 2015Class IIZ-1674-2015Process designDevice does not mate as intended.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.2 years on median.
  • 3 of the 19 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K091689.

How does its category compare?

All KWP devices

KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · KWP

9in 2015

2007: 142008: 132009: 122010: 142011: 122012: 182013: 122014: 132015: 9
2007high 18 (2012) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KWP

113in 2015

2007: 96 days median2008: 50 days median2009: 89 days median2010: 186 days median2011: 67 days median2012: 112 days median2013: 99 days median2014: 138 days median2015: 113 days median
2007high 186 (2010) · low 50 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KWP

2in 2022

2007: 22008: 12009: 232010: 22011: 62012: 12013: 32015: 12016: 32018: 12019: 22022: 2
2007high 23 (2009) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KWP

494in 2025

2007: 2102008: 5942009: 6822010: 4742011: 7922012: 9182013: 1,0902014: 1,0222015: 1,3482016: 1,3792017: 8642018: 6572019: 5182020: 7962021: 5252022: 3352023: 3322024: 4362025: 494
2007high 1,379 (2016) · low 210 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KWP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714962210
200813501594
2009128923682
2010141862474
201112676792
2012181121918
2013129931,090
20141313801,022
2015911311,348
20160—31,379
20170—0864
20180—1657
20190—2518
20200—0796
20210—0525
20220—2335
20230—0332
20240—0436
20250—0494
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

These Systems are intended for the following: Hooks, Plate/Rods, Plates, Rods and Screws When intended to provide stabilization as an adjunct to fusion of the cervical spine and occipitocervical junction (occiput-T3), the plate/rod, plates, rod, hook and screw (3.2 mm cortex) components of the Synthes CerviFix, Axon, OC Fusion and Synapse Systems are indicated for skeletally mature patients using allograft and/or autograft for the following: •…

Read the full statement (353 words)

These Systems are intended for the following:

Hooks, Plate/Rods, Plates, Rods and Screws

When intended to provide stabilization as an adjunct to fusion of the cervical spine and occipitocervical junction (occiput-T3), the plate/rod, plates, rod, hook and screw (3.2 mm cortex) components of the Synthes CerviFix, Axon, OC Fusion and Synapse Systems are indicated for skeletally mature patients using allograft and/or autograft for the following:

• Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc as confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies)

• Spondylolisthesis

• Spinal stenosis

• Fracture/dislocation

• Atlantoaxial fracture with instability

• Occipitocervical dislocation

• Revision of previous cervical spine surgery

• Tumor

When used to treat these cervical and occipitocervical conditions, screws are limited to occipital fixation only.

Hooks and Rods

The rod and hook components are also intended to provide stabilization to promote fusion following reduction of fracture/dislocation or trauma in the cervical/upper thoracic (C1-T3) spine.

Rods, Clamps, Screws, Nuts, Variable Axis Screws, Locking Screws and Transverse Bars

The rods, clamps, screws, nuts, variable axis screws, locking screws and transverse bars are intended to promote fusion following reduction of fracture/dislocation or trauma in the upper thoracic spine (T1-T3).

The use of these screws (3.5 mm, 4.0 mm and 4.5 mm cancellous and 3.5 mm and 4.2 mm cortex) is limited to placement in T1-T3 in treating thoracic conditions only. They are not intended to be placed in or treat conditions involving the cervical spine.

The Synthes CerviFix, Axon, and Synapse Systems can also be linked to the Synthes Universal Spinal System using the 3.5 mm/6.0 mm and 4.0 mm/6.0 mm parallel connectors from that system and via the CerviFix tapered rods using lamina hooks, transverse process hooks, pedicle hooks, 4.2 mm screws, and the 5.0 mm/6.0 mm parallel connector.

The Synthes Synapse System can be linked to the DePuy EXPEDIUM 5.5 Titanium Spine System using the 3.5 mm/5.5 mm and 4.0 mm/5.5 mm titanium tapered rods.

Warning: This device is not intended for screw attachment or fixation to the posterior elements (pedicles) of the cervical, thoracic (T4-T12) or lumbar spine.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K142460: EXPEDIUM Spine System/Synapse System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K142460

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026