510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ackermann Intervertebral Body Fusion Device

K143450510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 16, 2015288-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ackermann Instrumente GmbH · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Sep 16, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K142347 (Amedica Corp., 2014) and 2 other predicates after a 288-day review. Its family tree reaches back 13 generations to 1984.

Decided
Sep 16, 2015
Review
288 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 13 generations to K841189 (1984). 57 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 13 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 9 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK082801 Phantom Plus Cage SystemUs Spine · 2008
  4. 2 generations backK121892 Phantom Plus Ceramic Cage SystemAmedica Corp. · 2012
  5. 1 generation backK142347 Amedica Valeo II Interbody Fusion DeviceAmedica Corp. · 2014
  6. This deviceK143450 Ackermann Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceAckermann Instrumente GmbH · 2015
Show all 13 generations
  1. Root · 13 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 12 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 11 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 10 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 9 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 8 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 7 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
  8. 6 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  9. 5 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  10. 4 generations backK080401 Shell Cage, Wave Cage, Loop CageAdvanced Medical Technologies AG · 2008
  11. 3 generations backK082801 Phantom Plus Cage SystemUs Spine · 2008
  12. 2 generations backK121892 Phantom Plus Ceramic Cage SystemAmedica Corp. · 2012
  13. 1 generation backK142347 Amedica Valeo II Interbody Fusion DeviceAmedica Corp. · 2014
  14. This deviceK143450 Ackermann Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceAckermann Instrumente GmbH · 2015
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−13K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−12K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−11K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−10K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−9K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−8K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−7K042930Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc.2004—
−6K062759Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−5K072120Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−4K080401Shell Cage, Wave Cage, Loop CageAdvanced Medical Technologies AG2008—
−3K082801Phantom Plus Cage SystemUs Spine2008—
−2K121892Phantom Plus Ceramic Cage SystemAmedica Corp.2012—
−1K142347Amedica Valeo II Interbody Fusion DeviceAmedica Corp.2014—
0 (this device)K143450Ackermann Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceAckermann Instrumente GmbH2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199910
200010
200180
200260
200340
200480
200570
200610
200720
200830
200910
201010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K143450, 1984–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K142347Amedica Valeo II Interbody Fusion Device
Summary page 5
…ct Code: MAX, ODP LEGALLY MARKETED DEVICES TO WHICH ACKERMANN IS CLAIMING SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE: Primary Predicate Device: Amedica Valeo II Interbody Fusion Device (K142347) Additional Predicate Devices: Aesculap CeSpace PEEK Spinal Implant System (K083311) and Aesculap PEEK Spinal Implant Syst…
Amedica Corp.2014—
*K083311Aesculap Cespace Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System
Summary page 5
…IVALENCE: Primary Predicate Device: Amedica Valeo II Interbody Fusion Device (K142347) Additional Predicate Devices: Aesculap CeSpace PEEK Spinal Implant System (K083311) and Aesculap PEEK Spinal Implant System (K071983) DEVICE DESCRIPTION: Ackermann Intervertebral Body Fusion Device c|spine and…
Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc.2009—
*K071983Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace, Prospace, T-Space
Summary page 5
…II Interbody Fusion Device (K142347) Additional Predicate Devices: Aesculap CeSpace PEEK Spinal Implant System (K083311) and Aesculap PEEK Spinal Implant System (K071983) DEVICE DESCRIPTION: Ackermann Intervertebral Body Fusion Device c|spine and t|spine is an intervertebral body fusion device t…
Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc.20081

Also cleared against K142347: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 31 years and passes through 11 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.0 years on median.
  • 3 of the 57 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K142347.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Ackermann Intervertebral Body Fusion Device c|spine implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients. Cervical interbody fusion implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and…

Read the full statement (250 words)

When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Ackermann Intervertebral Body Fusion Device c|spine implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients. Cervical interbody fusion implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. Additionally, the c|spine implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and supplemental fixation via an open, anterior approach.

When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the Ackermann Intervertebral Body Fusion Device t|spine implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients. Lumbar interbody fusion implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The t|spine implants may be implanted via an open or a minimally invasive posterior approach. Alternatively, these implants may be implanted via a transforaminal approach. These implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and supplemental fixation.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K143450: Ackermann Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K143450

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026