510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Brainscope Ahead 200

K143643510(k) TraditionalCleared May 15, 2015144-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.1450

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Brainscope Company, Inc. · PIW Brain Injury Adjunctive Interpretive Electroencephalograph Assessment Aid

Cleared on May 15, 2015 as substantially equivalent to DEN140025 (Brainscope Company, Inc., 2014) after a 144-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2014. 7 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 15, 2015
Review
144 days
Class
Class II
Product code
PIW
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to DEN140025 (2014). 7 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2016: 1 descendant cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2019: 2 descendants cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2025: 1 descendant clearedDEN140025 · BrainScope Ahead 100 · Brainscope Company, Inc. · 20142010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 2 descendants4 generations forward: 1 descendant5 generations forward: 1 descendant6 generations forward: 1 descendant DEN140025 · BrainScope Ahead 100 · Brainscope Company, Inc. · 20140+5
  1. Root · 1 generation backDEN140025 BrainScope Ahead 100Brainscope Company, Inc. · 2014
  2. This deviceK143643 Brainscope Ahead 200Brainscope Company, Inc. · 2015
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 6 of its ownK161068 Ahead 300Brainscope Company, Inc. · 2016
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 5 of its ownK181179 BrainScope OneBrainscope Company, Inc. · 2018
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 3 of its ownK183241 BrainScope TBI (Model: Ahead 400)Brainscope Company, Inc. · 2019
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 2 of its ownK190815 BrainScope TBIBrainscope Company, Inc. · 2019
  7. Descendant · 5 generations on · 1 of its ownK231914 Nurochek-II SystemHeadsafe Mfg Pty, Ltd. · 2023

Showing 5 of 7 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2016: 12018: 22019: 22023: 12025: 1
2016high 2 (2018) · low 0 (2017)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 7 · See all
  • K161068Ahead 300Brainscope Company, Inc. · 2016 · cites it directly6descendants
  • K181179BrainScope OneBrainscope Company, Inc. · 2018 · 2 generations on5descendants
  • K183241BrainScope TBI (Model: Ahead 400)Brainscope Company, Inc. · 2019 · 3 generations on3descendants
  • K190815BrainScope TBIBrainscope Company, Inc. · 2019 · 4 generations on2descendants
  • K231914Nurochek-II SystemHeadsafe Mfg Pty, Ltd. · 2023 · 5 generations on1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1DEN140025BrainScope Ahead 100Brainscope Company, Inc.2014—
0 (this device)K143643Brainscope Ahead 200Brainscope Company, Inc.2015—
+1K161068Ahead 300Brainscope Company, Inc.2016—
+2K181179BrainScope OneBrainscope Company, Inc.2018—
+3K183241BrainScope TBI (Model: Ahead 400)Brainscope Company, Inc.2019—
+4K190815BrainScope TBIBrainscope Company, Inc.2019—
+5K231914Nurochek-II SystemHeadsafe Mfg Pty, Ltd.2023—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201610
201820
201920
202310
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K143643, 2014–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in PIW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new PIW device

  1. #1 K231914 Nurochek-II Systemscore 11.1 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*DEN140025BrainScope Ahead 100
Summary page 5
…W Predicate Device BrainScope® Ahead® 100 (Models M-100 and CV- 100) (DEN 140025) Date of Submission December 22, 2014 ® ®…
Brainscope Company, Inc.2014—

What descends from it? (7)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K161068Ahead 300Brainscope Company, Inc.20166

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K161068 (Brainscope Company, Inc., 2016) has gone furthest, with 6 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All PIW devices

PIW Brain Injury Adjunctive Interpretive Electroencephalograph Assessment Aid: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · PIW

1in 2025

2014: 12015: 12016: 12018: 22019: 22023: 12025: 1
2007high 2 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · PIW

Too few PIW 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · PIW

No recall names PIW since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · PIW

No MAUDE report names PIW since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20141—00
20151—00
20161—00
20170—00
20182—00
20192—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20231—00
20240—00
20251—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Ahead® 200, consisting of two models, i.e., the Ahead® M-200 and the Ahead® CV-200, is indicated for use as an adjunct to standard clinical practice to aid in the evaluation of patients who are being considered for a head CT, but should not be used as a substitute for a CT scan. This device is to be used for this purpose in patients who sustained a closed head injury within 24 hours, clinically present as a mild traumatic brain injury with a Glasgow…

Read the full statement (336 words)

The Ahead® 200, consisting of two models, i.e., the Ahead® M-200 and the Ahead® CV-200, is indicated for use as an adjunct to standard clinical practice to aid in the evaluation of patients who are being considered for a head CT, but should not be used as a substitute for a CT scan. This device is to be used for this purpose in patients who sustained a closed head injury within 24 hours, clinically present as a mild traumatic brain injury with a Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) of 13-15, and are between the ages of 18-80 years.

A negative BrainScope® Classification may correspond to brain electrical activity consistent with no structural brain injury visible on head CT in patients presenting as a mild traumatic brain injury, within 24 hours of injury.

A positive BrainScope® Classification corresponds to brain electrical activity that may be present in both patients with or without a structural brain injury visible on head CT. A positive BrainScope® Classification does not establish the presence of a structural brain injury visible on head CT.

The Ahead® 200 device is intended to record, measure, analyze, and display brain electrical activity utilizing the calculation of standard quantitative EEG (qEEG) parameters from frontal locations on a patient’s forehead. The Ahead® 200 calculates and displays raw measures for the following standard qEEG measures: Absolute and Relative Power, Asymmetry, Coherence and Fractal Dimension. These raw measures are intended to be used for post hoc analysis of EEG signals for interpretation by a qualified user.

The Ahead® M-200 model additionally stores and displays an electronic version of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) cognitive assessment and user-entered responses to the MACE questions. There is no interaction between EEG-related functionality, including analyzing and displaying brain electrical activity, and the function of storing and displaying MACE information.

The Ahead® 200 is intended for use by physicians, or under the direction of a physician, who have been trained in the use of the device.

The Ahead® 200 is a prescription use device.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K143643: Brainscope Ahead 200.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K143643

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026