510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2)

K143690510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 1, 2016464-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.3480

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ekso Bionics, Inc. · PHL Powered Exoskeleton

Cleared on Apr 1, 2016 as substantially equivalent to DEN130034 (Argo Medical Technologies, Inc., 2014) after a 464-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2014. 14 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 1, 2016
Review
464 days
Class
Class II
Product code
PHL
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to DEN130034 (2014). 14 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2016: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2022: 3 descendants cleared2026: 1 descendant cleared2025: 1 descendant clearedDEN130034 · Rewalk · Argo Medical Technologies, Inc. · 20142010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 4 descendants3 generations forward: 7 descendants4 generations forward: 1 descendant DEN130034 · Rewalk · Argo Medical Technologies, Inc. · 20140
  1. Root · 1 generation backDEN130034 RewalkArgo Medical Technologies, Inc. · 2014
  2. This deviceK143690 Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2)Ekso Bionics, Inc. · 2016
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 12 of its ownK161443 Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2)Ekso Bionics, Inc. · 2016
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 6 of its ownK171334 IndegoParker Hannifin Corporation · 2017
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 5 of its ownK173530 Indego (R)Parker-Hannifin Corporation · 2018
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 3 of its ownK221859 AtalanteWandercraft SAS · 2022 · Recalled
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK232077 Atalante XWandercraft SAS · 2023

Showing 5 of 14 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2016: 12017: 12018: 22019: 12020: 22021: 12022: 32023: 12025: 12026: 1
2016high 3 (2022) · low 0 (2024)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 14 · See all
  • K161443Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2)Ekso Bionics, Inc. · 2016 · cites it directly12descendants
  • K171334IndegoParker Hannifin Corporation · 2017 · 2 generations on6descendants
  • K173530Indego (R)Parker-Hannifin Corporation · 2018 · 2 generations on5descendants
  • K221859AtalanteWandercraft SAS · 2022 · 3 generations on3descendants
  • K232077Atalante XWandercraft SAS · 2023 · 3 generations on2descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1DEN130034RewalkArgo Medical Technologies, Inc.2014—
0 (this device)K143690Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2)Ekso Bionics, Inc.2016—
+1K161443Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2)Ekso Bionics, Inc.2016—
+2K171334IndegoParker Hannifin Corporation2017—
+2K173530Indego (R)Parker-Hannifin Corporation2018—
+3K221859AtalanteWandercraft SAS20221
+3K232077Atalante XWandercraft SAS2023—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201610
201710
201820
201910
202020
202110
202230
202310
202510
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K143690, 2014–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in PHL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new PHL device

  1. #1 K250904 Atalante Xscore 15.0 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*DEN130034Rewalk
Our reading of the summary gave K131798, which is not in FDA’s 510(k) list. The device the summary names is FDA’s De Novo DEN130034, Rewalk (Argo Medical Technologies, Inc.), granted Jun 26, 2014; older De Novo requests were first filed under a 510(k) number, so this links to the grant.
Argo Medical Technologies, Inc.2014—

Also cleared against DEN130034: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (14)

See all 14

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K161443Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2)Ekso Bionics, Inc.201612
K201473ExoAtlet-IIExoatlet Asia Co., Ltd.20210

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K161443 (Ekso Bionics, Inc., 2016) has gone furthest, with 12 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate DEN130034.

How does its category compare?

All PHL devices

PHL Powered Exoskeleton: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · PHL

2in 2025

2014: 12016: 42017: 22018: 22019: 22020: 42021: 12022: 32023: 22024: 12025: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 4 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · PHL

177in 2022

2016: 145 days median2020: 110 days median2022: 177 days median
2007high 177 (2022) · low 110 (2020)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · PHL

1in 2017

2017: 1
2007high 1 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · PHL

6in 2025

2015: 12016: 42017: 82018: 212020: 32021: 22022: 22023: 12024: 62025: 6
2007high 21 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code PHL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20141—00
20150—01
2016414504
20172—18
20182—021
20192—00
2020411003
20211—02
2022317702
20232—01
20241—06
20252—06
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2) are intended to perform ambulatory functions in rehabilitation institutions under the supervision of a trained physical therapist for the following population with upper extremity motor function of at least 4/5 in both arms:

• Individuals with hemiplegia due to stroke

• Individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels T4 to L5

• Individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels of C7 to T3 (ASIA D).

The therapist must complete a training program prior to use of the device. The devices are not intended for sports or stair climbing.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K143690: Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K143690

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026