510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Laparoscopic Handles with peek Insulation

K150127510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 4, 201515-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.1500

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Stryker Endoscopy · GCJ Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery

Cleared on Feb 4, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K973259 (Medical Creative Technologies, Inc., 1997) after a 15-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1997. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Feb 4, 2015
Review
15 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GCJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K973259 (1997). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2018: 1 descendant clearedK973259 · K&W 2-Piece Take-Apart Instruments (Various) · Medical Creative Technologies, Inc. · 19971995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K973259 · K&W 2-Piece Take-Apart Instruments (Various) · Medical Creative Technologies, Inc. · 19970
  1. Root · 1 generation backK973259 K&W 2-Piece Take-Apart Instruments (Various)Medical Creative Technologies, Inc. · 1997
  2. This deviceK150127 Laparoscopic Handles with peek InsulationStryker Endoscopy · 2015
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK173272 Ergonomic HandleSymmetry Surgical, Inc. · 2018

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K173272Ergonomic HandleSymmetry Surgical, Inc. · 2018 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K973259K&W 2-Piece Take-Apart Instruments (Various)Medical Creative Technologies, Inc.1997—
0 (this device)K150127Laparoscopic Handles with peek InsulationStryker Endoscopy2015—
+1K173272Ergonomic HandleSymmetry Surgical, Inc.2018—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K150127, 1997–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GCJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GCJ device

  1. #1 K214046 780 nm 1688 4K Camera System, 780 nm L11 LED…score 21.4 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K973259K&W 2-Piece Take-Apart Instruments (Various)
Summary page 4
…ors Classification Name: Endoscope and Accessories (21 CFR 876.1500) Regulatory Class: II Product Code: GCJ III. PREDICATE DEVICE K&W 2-Piece Take-Apart Instruments, K973259 No reference devices were used in this submission. IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION Laparoscopic surgical manual instruments (c…
Medical Creative Technologies, Inc.1997—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K173272Ergonomic HandleSymmetry Surgical, Inc.20180

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K173272 (Symmetry Surgical, Inc., 2018) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GCJ devices

GCJ Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GCJ

21in 2025

2007: 182008: 192009: 212010: 242011: 152012: 172013: 152014: 192015: 262016: 272017: 202018: 212019: 152020: 282021: 182022: 202023: 312024: 292025: 212026 (partial year): 26
2007high 31 (2023) · low 15 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GCJ

108in 2025

2007: 42 days median2008: 73 days median2009: 85 days median2010: 122 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 88 days median2013: 93 days median2014: 90 days median2015: 76 days median2016: 99 days median2017: 77 days median2018: 88 days median2019: 60 days median2020: 61 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 103 days median2023: 109 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 108 days median2026 (partial year): 122 days median
2007high 122 (2010) · low 42 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GCJ

5in 2025

2007: 122008: 162009: 62010: 302011: 92012: 12013: 7, 1 Class I2014: 22016: 52017: 12018: 12022: 12023: 12025: 52026 (partial year): 1
2007high 30 (2010) · low 0 (2015)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GCJ

5,860in 2025

2007: 1,6392008: 1,3192009: 1,9952010: 2,6572011: 2,1332012: 1,5262013: 1,5652014: 1,7142015: 1,7102016: 2,0802017: 3,4682018: 2,5622019: 2,5782020: 2,6182021: 3,4312022: 3,9452023: 6,0022024: 6,0472025: 5,860
2007high 6,047 (2024) · low 1,319 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GCJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071842121,639
20081973161,319
2009218561,995
201024122302,657
20111511392,133
2012178811,526
201315937 (1)1,565
2014199021,714
2015267601,710
2016279952,080
2017207713,468
2018218812,562
2019156002,578
2020286102,618
20211811603,431
20222010313,945
20233110916,002
2024299006,047
20252110855,860
2026261221—

What is it indicated for?

The Laparoscopic Handles with PEEK Insulation are indicated for use in endoscopic surgical procedures through cannulae to perform cutting, dissecting, retracting, and manipulating functions.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K150127: Laparoscopic Handles with peek Insulation.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K150127

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026