510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2019

BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System

K151188510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 17, 2015136-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1025Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Preventice · DSI Detector And Alarm, Arrhythmia

Cleared on Sep 17, 2015 after a 136-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Sep 17, 2015
Review
136 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DSI
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2019: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant cleared201620182020202220242026
  1. This deviceK151188 BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring SystemPreventice · 2015
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK192732 BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring SystemPreventice Technologies, Inc. · 2020
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK243349 BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System (BGRMS v3.0)Boston Scientific Cardiac Diagnostic Technologies, Inc. · 2026
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK181658 MobileECG 2 BTMemtec Corporation · 2019

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K192732BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring SystemPreventice Technologies, Inc. · 2020 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K243349BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System (BGRMS v3.0)Boston Scientific Cardiac Diagnostic Technologies, Inc. · 2026 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K181658MobileECG 2 BTMemtec Corporation · 2019 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K151188BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring SystemPreventice2015—
+1K192732BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring SystemPreventice Technologies, Inc.2020—
+2K243349BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System (BGRMS v3.0)Boston Scientific Cardiac Diagnostic Technologies, Inc.2026—
+1K181658MobileECG 2 BTMemtec Corporation2019—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201910
202010
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K151188, 2015–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DSI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DSI device

  1. #1 K243349 BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System (BGRMS…score 13.1 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—eMotion Faros ECG Mobile
Named without a submission number
—
*—BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (3)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K192732BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring SystemPreventice Technologies, Inc.20201
K181658MobileECG 2 BTMemtec Corporation20190

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Aug 6, 2019Class IIZ-2479-2020Software design (manufacturing process)The device data being collected and transferred to the monitoring center may not be accurate due to nonvalidated association between the phone software and the heart monitors, therefore, the patient's report should not be used to evaluate…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K192732 (Preventice Technologies, Inc., 2020) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All DSI devices

DSI Detector And Alarm, Arrhythmia: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DSI

1in 2025

2007: 72008: 52009: 62010: 62011: 62012: 32013: 12014: 42015: 92016: 62018: 22019: 32020: 22023: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2015) · low 0 (2017)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DSI

243in 2019

2007: 151 days median2008: 70 days median2009: 73 days median2010: 111 days median2011: 114 days median2012: 113 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 127 days median2016: 224 days median2019: 243 days median
2007high 243 (2019) · low 70 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DSI

18in 2025

2007: 42008: 82009: 32010: 52011: 32012: 12018: 12019: 42020: 22022: 12023: 22025: 182026 (partial year): 1
2007high 18 (2025) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DSI

712in 2025

2007: 642008: 1562009: 2792010: 8232011: 7932012: 7662013: 7952014: 1,0002015: 1,6452016: 4,3522017: 3,5942018: 3,6482019: 3,4852020: 3,0842021: 3,0922022: 1,6382023: 1,6162024: 1,3202025: 712
2007high 4,352 (2016) · low 64 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DSI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20077151464
20085708156
20096733279
201061115823
201161143793
201231131766
20131—0795
2014420001,000
2015912701,645
2016622404,352
20170—03,594
20182—13,648
2019324343,485
20202—23,084
20210—03,092
20220—11,638
20232—21,616
20241—01,320
20251—18712
20261—1—

What is it indicated for?

The BodyGuardian System detects and monitors cardiac arrhythmias in ambulatory patients, when prescribed by a physician or other qualified healthcare professional. Not for use with patients requiring attended, In-hospital monitoring for life threatening arrhythmias. The Preventice BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System is intended for use with adult patients in clinical and non-clinical settings to collect and transmit health parameters to healthcare…

Read the full statement (102 words)

The BodyGuardian System detects and monitors cardiac arrhythmias in ambulatory patients, when prescribed by a physician or other qualified healthcare professional. Not for use with patients requiring attended, In-hospital monitoring for life threatening arrhythmias.

The Preventice BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System is intended for use with adult patients in clinical and non-clinical settings to collect and transmit health parameters to healthcare professionals for monitoring and evaluation. Health parameters are collected from a variety of commercially available, external plug in devices such as ECG sensors, Weight Scales, Blood Pressure Meters and Pulse Oximeters.

The Preventice BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System does not provide any diagnosis.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K151188: BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K151188

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026