510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

CONCORDE Bullet Spinal System

K151352510(k) SpecialCleared Oct 8, 2015141-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medos International SARL · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Oct 8, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K140759 (Medos International SARL, 2014) and 2 other predicates after a 141-day review. Its family tree reaches back 13 generations to 1984. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Oct 8, 2015
Review
141 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 13 generations to K841189 (1984). 29 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 13 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 9 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK110454 Cougar LS Lateral Cage SystemJohnson & Johnson · 2011
  4. 2 generations backK122896 Cougar LS 15 Lateral Cage SystemMedos International SARL · 2012
  5. 1 generation backK140759 Bengal System, Bengal Stackable System, Concorde Bullet Lumbar…Medos International SARL · 2014
  6. This deviceK151352 CONCORDE Bullet Spinal SystemMedos International SARL · 2015
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK173787 X-MESH® Expandable Cage System, OCELOT® Stackable Cage System…Medos International SARL · 2018
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK192214 CarboClear VBR SystemCarboFix Orthopedics, Ltd. · 2019
  9. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK222874 CarboClear Cervical Cage System, CarboClear Cervical VBR SystemCarbofix Orthpedics, Ltd. · 2023
Show all 13 generations
  1. Root · 13 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 12 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 11 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 10 generations backK020522 Modification to Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2002
  5. 9 generations backK030833 Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed · 2003
  6. 8 generations backK031635 Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed · 2003
  7. 7 generations backK041722 Modification to VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2004
  8. 6 generations backK052746 Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2005
  9. 5 generations backK081917 Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard SystemsDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2009
  10. 4 generations backK101923 Concorde Curve SystemDepuy Spine · 2010
  11. 3 generations backK110454 Cougar LS Lateral Cage SystemJohnson & Johnson · 2011
  12. 2 generations backK122896 Cougar LS 15 Lateral Cage SystemMedos International SARL · 2012
  13. 1 generation backK140759 Bengal System, Bengal Stackable System, Concorde Bullet Lumbar…Medos International SARL · 2014
  14. This deviceK151352 CONCORDE Bullet Spinal SystemMedos International SARL · 2015

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K173787X-MESH® Expandable Cage System, OCELOT® Stackable Cage System, Stackable Cage System…Medos International SARL · 2018 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K192214CarboClear VBR SystemCarboFix Orthopedics, Ltd. · 2019 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K222874CarboClear Cervical Cage System, CarboClear Cervical VBR SystemCarbofix Orthpedics, Ltd. · 2023 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−13K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−12K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−11K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−10K020522Modification to Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2002—
−9K030833Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed2003—
−8K031635Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed2003—
−7K041722Modification to VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2004—
−6K052746Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2005—
−5K081917Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard SystemsDepuy Spine, Inc.2009—
−4K101923Concorde Curve SystemDepuy Spine2010—
−3K110454Cougar LS Lateral Cage SystemJohnson & Johnson2011—
−2K122896Cougar LS 15 Lateral Cage SystemMedos International SARL2012—
−1K140759Bengal System, Bengal Stackable System, Concorde Bullet Lumbar, Concorde…Medos International SARL2014—
0 (this device)K151352CONCORDE Bullet Spinal SystemMedos International SARL2015—
+1K173787X-MESH® Expandable Cage System, OCELOT® Stackable Cage System, Stackable Cage…Medos International SARL2018—
+2K192214CarboClear VBR SystemCarboFix Orthopedics, Ltd.2019—
+3K222874CarboClear Cervical Cage System, CarboClear Cervical VBR SystemCarbofix Orthpedics, Ltd.2023—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199910
200010
200130
200210
200310
200720
200840
200910
201110

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201810
201910
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K151352, 1984–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K140759Bengal System, Bengal Stackable System, Concorde Bullet Lumbar, Concorde Inline Lumbar…
Summary page 4
…System, Concorde (Bullet and Inline) Lumbar Interbody System, Cougar System, Cougar LS Lateral Cage System, Leopard System (K140759) – Primary predicate MEDOS International, Sarl.,…
Medos International SARL2014—
*K081917Depuy Spine Bengal, Concorde, Cougar, Devex and Leopard Systems
Summary page 5
…Page 2 of 3 DePuy Spine BENGAL, CONCORDE, COUGAR, DEVEX, and LEOPARD Systems (K081917) – Additional predicate DEVEX Mesh System (K023835) – Additional predicate E. Device Description…
Depuy Spine, Inc.2009—
*K023835Devex Mesh System
Summary page 5
…DePuy Spine BENGAL, CONCORDE, COUGAR, DEVEX, and LEOPARD Systems (K081917) – Additional predicate DEVEX Mesh System (K023835) – Additional predicate E. Device Description The CONCORDE Bullet Spinal System is a system of…
Depuyacromed2003—

Also cleared against K140759: 5 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K173787X-MESH® Expandable Cage System, OCELOT® Stackable Cage System, Stackable Cage System…Medos International SARL20182

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 31 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.3 years on median.
  • None of the 29 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K173787 (Medos International SARL, 2018) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K140759.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The CONCORDE Bullet Spinal System is indicated for use as intervertebral body fusion devices in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies) at one or two contiguous levels of the lumbar spine (L2-S1). Patients should have six months of non-operative treatment prior to surgery. These implants are used to facilitate fusion in…

Read the full statement (216 words)

The CONCORDE Bullet Spinal System is indicated for use as intervertebral body fusion devices in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies) at one or two contiguous levels of the lumbar spine (L2-S1). Patients should have six months of non-operative treatment prior to surgery. These implants are used to facilitate fusion in the lumbar spine and are placed via either a PLIF or TLIF approach using autogenous bone. When used as interbody fusion devices, these implants are intended for use with DePuy Spine supplemental internal fixation products.

The CONCORDE Bullet Spinal System is indicated for use in the thoracolumbar spine (i.e., T1-L5) to replace a diseased vertebral body resected or excised for the treatment of tumors, to achieve anterior decompression of the spinal cord and neural tissues, and to restore height of a collapsed vertebral body. This system is also indicated for treating fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. This system is designed to restore the biomechanical integrity of the anterior, middle, and posterior spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a prolonged period. When used as a vertebral body replacement device, this system is intended for the use with DePuy Spine supplemental internal fixation products.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K151352: CONCORDE Bullet Spinal System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K151352

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026