510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Central Monitoring System

K153580510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 7, 2016267-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.2740

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Guangdong Biolight Meditech Co., Ltd. · HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal

Cleared on Sep 7, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K103172 (Civnet Communication, Ltd., 2011) after a 267-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1984.

Decided
Sep 7, 2016
Review
267 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HGM
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K833395 (1984). 19 ancestors in all, the oldest K771553 (1977). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2009: 1 other ancestor2008: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor2007: 1 other ancestor2003: 1 other ancestor1989: 1 other ancestor1985: 2 other ancestors1994: 1 other ancestor1991: 1 other ancestor1987: 1 other ancestor1980: 1 other ancestor1977: 1 other ancestorK833395 · Sentinel Systems · Quantitative Medicine, Inc. · 1984K960109 · Quantitative Sentinel System · Quantitative Medicine, Inc. · 1996K963608 · Quantitative Sentinel System · Quantitative Medicine, Inc. · 1997K993008 · Quantitative Sentinel System · Marquette Medical Systems, Inc. · 1999 · recalledK051175 · Civ-OB Obstrical Monitoring Software Application · Civent Communications, Ltd. · 2006K103172 · Civ-OB (Plus) · Civnet Communication, Ltd. · 20111980199020002010
  1. Root · 6 generations backK833395 Sentinel SystemsQuantitative Medicine, Inc. · 1984
  2. 5 generations backK960109 Quantitative Sentinel SystemQuantitative Medicine, Inc. · 1996
  3. 4 generations backK963608 Quantitative Sentinel SystemQuantitative Medicine, Inc. · 1997
  4. 3 generations backK993008 Quantitative Sentinel SystemMarquette Medical Systems, Inc. · 1999 · Recalled
  5. 2 generations backK051175 Civ-OB Obstrical Monitoring Software ApplicationCivent Communications, Ltd. · 2006
  6. 1 generation backK103172 Civ-OB (Plus)Civnet Communication, Ltd. · 2011
  7. This deviceK153580 Central Monitoring SystemGuangdong Biolight Meditech Co., Ltd. · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K833395Sentinel SystemsQuantitative Medicine, Inc.1984—
−5K960109Quantitative Sentinel SystemQuantitative Medicine, Inc.1996—
−4K963608Quantitative Sentinel SystemQuantitative Medicine, Inc.1997—
−3K993008Quantitative Sentinel SystemMarquette Medical Systems, Inc.19993
−2K051175Civ-OB Obstrical Monitoring Software ApplicationCivent Communications, Ltd.2006—
−1K103172Civ-OB (Plus)Civnet Communication, Ltd.2011—
0 (this device)K153580Central Monitoring SystemGuangdong Biolight Meditech Co., Ltd.2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
197710
198010
198520
198710
198910
199110
199410
199510
200310
200710
200810
200910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K153580, 1984–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HGM? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HGM device

  1. #1 K241882 Fetal & Maternal Monitor (F15A, F15A Air)score 19.5 · 33 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K103172Civ-OB (Plus)
Summary page 4
…rinatal Regulation Number: 21 CFR 884.2740 Review Panel: Obstetrics/Gynecology 5. Identification of Predicate Device(s) 510(k) Number: K103172 Product Name: Obstetrical Data Management and Monitoring Software Application Model Name: CIV-OB (PLUS) 6.…
Civnet Communication, Ltd.2011—

Also cleared against K103172: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 32 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.5 years on median.
  • 3 of the 19 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K103172.

How does its category compare?

All HGM devices

HGM System, Monitoring, Perinatal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HGM

4in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 42010: 42011: 132012: 42013: 22014: 42015: 52016: 12017: 32018: 32020: 12022: 12023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 13 (2011) · low 0 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HGM

269in 2025

2007: 56 days median2008: 75 days median2009: 66 days median2010: 193 days median2011: 141 days median2012: 107 days median2014: 231 days median2015: 169 days median2017: 138 days median2018: 258 days median2025: 269 days median
2007high 269 (2025) · low 56 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HGM

5in 2019

2008: 42009: 62013: 12014: 12019: 52026 (partial year): 2
2007high 6 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HGM

99in 2025

2007: 352008: 172009: 422010: 642011: 832012: 442013: 162014: 302015: 442016: 172017: 272018: 302019: 412020: 192021: 712022: 872023: 692024: 1742025: 99
2007high 174 (2024) · low 16 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HGM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007356035
2008475417
2009466642
20104193064
201113141083
20124107044
20132—116
20144231130
20155169044
20161—017
20173138027
20183258030
20190—541
20201—019
20210—071
20221—087
20232—069
20241—0174
20254269099
20262—2—

What is it indicated for?

Central Monitoring System Software is intended to conduct centralized antepartum and intrapartum monitoring of pregnant women’s vital sign information from compatible bedside monitors. The software collects, stores, displays and alarms the information provided on the bedside monitor. The monitoring parameters include Electrocardiogram(ECG), Heart Rate(HR), Respiration(RESP), Pulse Oxygen Saturation(SpO2), Pulse Rate(PR), Non-invasive Blood Pressure…

Read the full statement (97 words)

Central Monitoring System Software is intended to conduct centralized antepartum and intrapartum monitoring of pregnant women’s vital sign information from compatible bedside monitors. The software collects, stores, displays and alarms the information provided on the bedside monitor. The monitoring parameters include Electrocardiogram(ECG), Heart Rate(HR), Respiration(RESP), Pulse Oxygen Saturation(SpO2), Pulse Rate(PR), Non-invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP), Invasive Blood Pressure(IBP), Impedance Cardiograph(ICG), TEMP(Temperature), Carbon dioxide (CO2), Anesthetic Gas (AG), Fetal Heart Rate (FHR), Uterine contraction (TOCO) and Fetal Movement (FM). It is intended to be used in the hospital or medical institutions, and it is not intended for home use.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K153580: Central Monitoring System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K153580

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026