510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

OIC Cervical PEEK Spacer

K160222510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 7, 2016313-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

The Orthopaedic Implant Company · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Dec 7, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K092540 (Rsb Spine, LLC, 2010) and 1 other predicate after a 313-day review. Its family tree reaches back 11 generations to 1984.

Decided
Dec 7, 2016
Review
313 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 11 generations to K841189 (1984). 52 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 7 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  4. 2 generations backK073177 Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device SystemPioneer Surgical Technology · 2008 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK092540 C-PS Peek Optima Cervical Interbody Spacer, L-PS Peek Optima Lumbar…Rsb Spine, LLC · 2010
  6. This deviceK160222 OIC Cervical PEEK SpacerThe Orthopaedic Implant Company · 2016
Show all 11 generations
  1. Root · 11 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 10 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 9 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 8 generations backK022793 Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  5. 7 generations backK031757 Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC · 2003
  6. 6 generations backK041888 Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH · 2004
  7. 5 generations backK042930 Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc. · 2004
  8. 4 generations backK062759 Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  9. 3 generations backK072120 Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. · 2007
  10. 2 generations backK073177 Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device SystemPioneer Surgical Technology · 2008 · Recalled
  11. 1 generation backK092540 C-PS Peek Optima Cervical Interbody Spacer, L-PS Peek Optima Lumbar…Rsb Spine, LLC · 2010
  12. This deviceK160222 OIC Cervical PEEK SpacerThe Orthopaedic Implant Company · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−11K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−10K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−9K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−8K022793Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−7K031757Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medical, LLC2003—
−6K041888Curved Peek Tetris Spinal ImplantSignus Medizintechnik GmbH2004—
−5K042930Spacevision Cage SystemSpine Vision, Inc.2004—
−4K062759Paramount VBR SystemInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−3K072120Paramount Intervertebral Body Fusion DeviceInnovative Spinal Technologies, Inc.2007—
−2K073177Pioneer Intervertebral Fusion Device SystemPioneer Surgical Technology20081
−1K092540C-PS Peek Optima Cervical Interbody Spacer, L-PS Peek Optima Lumbar Interbody…Rsb Spine, LLC2010—
0 (this device)K160222OIC Cervical PEEK SpacerThe Orthopaedic Implant Company2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199920
200010
200190
200260
200320
200460
200520
200610
200750
200830
200910
201010
201110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K160222, 1984–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K092540C-PS Peek Optima Cervical Interbody Spacer, L-PS Peek Optima Lumbar Interbody Spacer
Summary page 4
…ne lordotic angle (7°) and heights ranging from 6mm to 10mm in 1mm increments. Comparison of Technological Characteristics (Substantial Equivalence): Predicate device - K092540 InterPlate C-PS Interbody Spacers The modified Cervical PEEK Spacer has the following similarities to those which previo…
Rsb Spine, LLC2010—
*K111272Rhausler Plage Anterior Cervical Fusion System
Summary page 4
…e the same design, · incorporate the same materials, · have the same shelf life, and · are packaged using the same materials and processes. Additional Predicate device - K111272 Rhausler Plage Anterior Cervical Fusion System The materials, geometry and use of the instruments for implantation are the same a…
Rhausler, Inc.2011—

Also cleared against K092540: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 32 years and passes through 10 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • 8 of the 52 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K092540.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

The Cervical PEEK Spacer is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the cervical spine in skeletally mature patients. The device system is designed for use with autograft to facilitate fusion. One device is used per intervertebral space. The Cervical PEEK Spacer is intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C3 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. The Cervical PEEK Spacer is intended to be used with a supplemental internal fixation system.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K160222: OIC Cervical PEEK Spacer.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K160222

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026