510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Well Lead Extraction Bag

K160801510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 29, 2016251-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.1500

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Well Lead Medical Co., Ltd. · GCJ Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery

Cleared on Nov 29, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K013872 (Rusch Intl., 2002) and 1 other predicate after a 251-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1991.

Decided
Nov 29, 2016
Review
251 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GCJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K910914 (1991). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2014: 1 other ancestor2009: 1 other ancestor2006: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestorK910914 · Surgical Tissue Pouch · Cook Urological, Inc. · 1991 · recalledK013872 · Rusch Memory Bag · Rusch Intl. · 2002199019952000200520102015
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 3 other ancestors K013872 · Rusch Memory Bag · Rusch Intl. · 2002K910914 · Surgical Tissue Pouch · Cook Urological, Inc. · 1991 · recalled0
  1. Root · 2 generations backK910914 Surgical Tissue PouchCook Urological, Inc. · 1991 · Recalled
  2. 1 generation backK013872 Rusch Memory BagRusch Intl. · 2002
  3. This deviceK160801 Well Lead Extraction BagWell Lead Medical Co., Ltd. · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K910914Surgical Tissue PouchCook Urological, Inc.19911
−1K013872Rusch Memory BagRusch Intl.2002—
0 (this device)K160801Well Lead Extraction BagWell Lead Medical Co., Ltd.2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200610
200910
201410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K160801, 1991–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GCJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GCJ device

  1. #1 K214046 780 nm 1688 4K Camera System, 780 nm L11 LED…score 21.4 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K013872Rusch Memory Bag
Summary page 4
…876.1500 Regulation Name: Endoscope and accessories Product Code: GCJ Regulatory Class: Class II Predicate Device(s): K013872-Rüsch Memory Bag K132375-GENICON Single-Use Specimen Retrieval Bag 1. Intended Use The Well Lead E…
Rusch Intl.2002—
*K132375Genistrong Single-Use Specimen Retrieval Bag
Summary page 4
…cessories Product Code: GCJ Regulatory Class: Class II Predicate Device(s): K013872-Rüsch Memory Bag K132375-GENICON Single-Use Specimen Retrieval Bag 1. Intended Use The Well Lead Extraction Bag is intended for use by qualified surgeons…
Genicon20141

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 25 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 14.8 years on median.
  • 3 of the 6 ancestors have a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All GCJ devices

GCJ Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GCJ

21in 2025

2007: 182008: 192009: 212010: 242011: 152012: 172013: 152014: 192015: 262016: 272017: 202018: 212019: 152020: 282021: 182022: 202023: 312024: 292025: 212026 (partial year): 26
2007high 31 (2023) · low 15 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GCJ

108in 2025

2007: 42 days median2008: 73 days median2009: 85 days median2010: 122 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 88 days median2013: 93 days median2014: 90 days median2015: 76 days median2016: 99 days median2017: 77 days median2018: 88 days median2019: 60 days median2020: 61 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 103 days median2023: 109 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 108 days median2026 (partial year): 122 days median
2007high 122 (2010) · low 42 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GCJ

5in 2025

2007: 122008: 162009: 62010: 302011: 92012: 12013: 7, 1 Class I2014: 22016: 52017: 12018: 12022: 12023: 12025: 52026 (partial year): 1
2007high 30 (2010) · low 0 (2015)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GCJ

5,860in 2025

2007: 1,6392008: 1,3192009: 1,9952010: 2,6572011: 2,1332012: 1,5262013: 1,5652014: 1,7142015: 1,7102016: 2,0802017: 3,4682018: 2,5622019: 2,5782020: 2,6182021: 3,4312022: 3,9452023: 6,0022024: 6,0472025: 5,860
2007high 6,047 (2024) · low 1,319 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GCJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071842121,639
20081973161,319
2009218561,995
201024122302,657
20111511392,133
2012178811,526
201315937 (1)1,565
2014199021,714
2015267601,710
2016279952,080
2017207713,468
2018218812,562
2019156002,578
2020286102,618
20211811603,431
20222010313,945
20233110916,002
2024299006,047
20252110855,860
2026261221—

What is it indicated for?

The Well Lead Extraction Bag is intended for use by qualified surgeons in tissue extraction procedures during laparoscopic surgery.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K160801: Well Lead Extraction Bag.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K160801

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026