510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ultrathane Endoureterotomy Stent Set

K160891510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 24, 201685-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.4620

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cook Incorporated · FAD Stent, Ureteral

Cleared on Jun 24, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K924608 (Boston Scientific Corp, 1994) after an 85-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994.

Decided
Jun 24, 2016
Review
85 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FAD
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K924608 (1994). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K924608 · Hydrogel Coated Percuflex (R) Drainage Catheters · Boston Scientific Corp · 1994199019952000200520102015
  1. Root · 1 generation backK924608 Hydrogel Coated Percuflex (R) Drainage CathetersBoston Scientific Corp · 1994
  2. This deviceK160891 Ultrathane Endoureterotomy Stent SetCook Incorporated · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K924608Hydrogel Coated Percuflex (R) Drainage CathetersBoston Scientific Corp1994—
0 (this device)K160891Ultrathane Endoureterotomy Stent SetCook Incorporated2016—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K160891, 1994–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FAD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FAD device

  1. #1 K251890 Disposable Ureteral Stentsscore 12.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K924608Hydrogel Coated Percuflex (R) Drainage Catheters
Summary page 4
…stroenterology/Urology Predicate Device: The predicate device is the Retromax Plus Endopyelotomy Stent cleared under 510(k) K924608. Device Description: The Ultrathane® Endoureterotomy Stent Set is comprised of a double pigtail endo…
Boston Scientific Corp1994—

Also cleared against K924608: 7 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 7 other devices also cite its predicate K924608.

How does its category compare?

All FAD devices

FAD Stent, Ureteral: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FAD

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 12010: 12014: 12016: 42017: 82018: 92019: 52020: 12021: 22022: 52024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2018) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FAD

186in 2025

2016: 143 days median2017: 266 days median2018: 258 days median2019: 263 days median2022: 143 days median2025: 186 days median
2007high 266 (2017) · low 143 (2016)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FAD

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 222009: 22010: 12016: 42019: 62020: 22021: 12022: 92025: 4
2007high 22 (2008) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FAD

634in 2025

2007: 432008: 762009: 1232010: 782011: 952012: 1312013: 822014: 782015: 1302016: 1822017: 2652018: 2772019: 2612020: 3522021: 5312022: 5592023: 6912024: 6032025: 634
2007high 691 (2023) · low 43 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FAD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—143
20081—2276
20090—2123
20101—178
20110—095
20120—0131
20130—082
20141—078
20150—0130
201641434182
201782660265
201892580277
201952636261
20201—2352
20212—1531
202251439559
20230—0691
20241—0603
202541864634
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The device is intended for temporary internal drainage from the ureteropelvic junction to the bladder following dilation and/or incision of a stricture. Double pigtail ureteral stents have been used to relieve obstruction in a variety of benign, malignant, and post-traumatic conditions. These stents may be placed using endoscopic, percutaneous, or open surgical techniques.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K160891: Ultrathane Endoureterotomy Stent Set.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K160891

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026