510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

HPM-6000

K160992510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 21, 2016196-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.5850

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

BTL Industries, Inc. · IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered

Cleared on Oct 21, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K973929 (Neotonus, Inc., 1998) and 1 other predicate after a 196-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995. 18 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Oct 21, 2016
Review
196 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IPF
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K952089 (1995). 2 ancestors in all. 18 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestor2023: 2 descendants cleared2021: 4 descendants cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2024: 4 descendants cleared2025: 3 descendants cleared2026: 3 descendants clearedK952089 · Rich-Mar CM-II Combined Muscle Stimulator, Interferential, Tens & Therapeutic Ultrasound Device · Rich-Mar Corp. · 19951995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 5 descendants2 generations forward: 8 descendants3 generations forward: 5 descendants K952089 · Rich-Mar CM-II Combined Muscle Stimulator, Interferential, Tens & Therapeutic Ultrasound Device · Rich-Mar Corp. · 19950
  1. Root · 1 generation backK952089 Rich-Mar CM-II Combined Muscle Stimulator, Interferential, Tens &…Rich-Mar Corp. · 1995
  2. This deviceK160992 HPM-6000BTL Industries, Inc. · 2016
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 11 of its ownK190456 BTL 799-2LBTL Industries, Inc. · 2019
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK203710 Storz Medical MAGNETOLITH Muscle StimulatorStorz Medical AG · 2021
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 4 of its ownK200382 BTL-703-2Btl · 2021
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK203488 emFieldZimmer Medizinsysteme GmbH · 2021
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK240234 BTL-899MSBTL Industries, Inc. · 2024

Showing 5 of 18 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2019: 12020: 12021: 42023: 22024: 42025: 32026: 3
2019high 4 (2021) · low 0 (2022)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 18 · See all
  • K190456BTL 799-2LBTL Industries, Inc. · 2019 · cites it directly11descendants
  • K203710Storz Medical MAGNETOLITH Muscle StimulatorStorz Medical AG · 2021 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K200382BTL-703-2Btl · 2021 · 2 generations on4descendants
  • K203488emFieldZimmer Medizinsysteme GmbH · 2021 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K240234BTL-899MSBTL Industries, Inc. · 2024 · 2 generations on2descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K952089Rich-Mar CM-II Combined Muscle Stimulator, Interferential, Tens & Therapeutic…Rich-Mar Corp.1995—
0 (this device)K160992HPM-6000BTL Industries, Inc.2016—
+1K190456BTL 799-2LBTL Industries, Inc.2019—
+1K203710Storz Medical MAGNETOLITH Muscle StimulatorStorz Medical AG2021—
+2K200382BTL-703-2Btl2021—
+1K203488emFieldZimmer Medizinsysteme GmbH2021—
+2K240234BTL-899MSBTL Industries, Inc.2024—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201910
202010
202140
202320
202440
202530
202630
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K160992, 1995–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IPF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IPF device

  1. #1 K241433 EVE Synergy (EVE-20M)score 19.7 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K973929Neotonus MS-101 Magnetic Muscle Stimulator System
Summary page 5
…f 6 0 510(K) SUMMARY • Neotonus MS-101 Magnetic Muscle Stimulator System (K973929) Product Description The HPM-6000 is a non-invasive therapeutic device. The device produces electromagnetic field that interact…
Neotonus, Inc.1998—
*K952089Rich-Mar CM-II Combined Muscle Stimulator, Interferential, Tens & Therapeutic Ultrasound…
Summary page 9
…inciples of operation as its predicate device. One of the technological differences between the subject and predicate devices includes pulse repetition rate. Therefore, K952089, a powered muscle stimulator cleared under the IPF product code (predicate of the predicate or K952089) has been submitted to dem…
Rich-Mar Corp.1995—

Also cleared against K973929: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (18)

See all 18

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K190456BTL 799-2LBTL Industries, Inc.201911
K203710Storz Medical MAGNETOLITH Muscle StimulatorStorz Medical AG20214
K203488emFieldZimmer Medizinsysteme GmbH20213
K202031Talent-Pro Electromagnetic StimulatorRemed Co., Ltd.20211
K232937BTL-899MBTL Industries, Inc.20230

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K190456 (BTL Industries, Inc., 2019) has gone furthest, with 11 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K973929.

How does its category compare?

All IPF devices

IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IPF

3in 2025

2007: 82008: 62009: 72010: 42011: 42012: 42013: 102014: 42015: 32016: 72017: 52018: 52019: 42020: 92021: 152022: 72023: 92024: 72025: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 15 (2021) · low 3 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IPF

257in 2025

2007: 143 days median2008: 140 days median2009: 216 days median2010: 121 days median2011: 275 days median2012: 269 days median2013: 180 days median2014: 264 days median2015: 43 days median2016: 113 days median2017: 110 days median2018: 73 days median2019: 133 days median2020: 121 days median2021: 98 days median2022: 108 days median2023: 255 days median2024: 201 days median2025: 257 days median2026 (partial year): 206 days median
2007high 275 (2011) · low 43 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IPF

1in 2023

2008: 12011: 12012: 32023: 1
2007high 3 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IPF

8in 2025

2007: 112008: 2132009: 1502010: 142011: 252012: 162013: 62014: 192015: 112016: 82017: 22018: 32019: 102020: 132021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 52025: 8
2007high 213 (2008) · low 2 (2017)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IPF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20078143011
200861401213
200972160150
20104121014
20114275125
20124269316
20131018006
20144264019
2015343011
2016711308
2017511002
201857303
20194133010
20209121013
2021159803
2022710804
2023925518
2024720105
2025325708
202632060—

What is it indicated for?

The HPM-6000 device is intended to be used under medical supervision for adjunctive therapy for the treatment of medical diseases and conditions.

The HPM-6000 device is indicated for use in stimulating neuromuscular tissue for bulk muscle excitation in the legs or arms for rehabilitative purposes.

Indications for Use for Muscle Stimulators:

• Relaxation of muscle spasms

• Prevention or retardation of disuse atrophy

• Increasing local blood circulation

• Muscle re-education

• Immediate post-surgical stimulation of calf muscles to prevent venous thrombosis

• Maintaining or increasing range of motion

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K160992: HPM-6000.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K160992

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026