510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Talent-Pro Electromagnetic Stimulator

K202031510(k) TraditionalCleared May 6, 2021288-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.5850

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Remed Co., Ltd. · IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered

Cleared on May 6, 2021 as substantially equivalent to K160992 (BTL Industries, Inc., 2016) after a 288-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1995. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
May 6, 2021
Review
288 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IPF
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K952089 (1995). 3 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestor2025: 1 descendant clearedK952089 · Rich-Mar CM-II Combined Muscle Stimulator, Interferential, Tens & Therapeutic Ultrasound Device · Rich-Mar Corp. · 1995K160992 · HPM-6000 · BTL Industries, Inc. · 20161995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K160992 · HPM-6000 · BTL Industries, Inc. · 2016K952089 · Rich-Mar CM-II Combined Muscle Stimulator, Interferential, Tens & Therapeutic Ultrasound Device · Rich-Mar Corp. · 19950
  1. Root · 2 generations backK952089 Rich-Mar CM-II Combined Muscle Stimulator, Interferential, Tens &…Rich-Mar Corp. · 1995
  2. 1 generation backK160992 HPM-6000BTL Industries, Inc. · 2016
  3. This deviceK202031 Talent-Pro Electromagnetic StimulatorRemed Co., Ltd. · 2021
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK251083 Compact IIEnraf-Nonius, B.V. · 2025

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K251083Compact IIEnraf-Nonius, B.V. · 2025 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K952089Rich-Mar CM-II Combined Muscle Stimulator, Interferential, Tens & Therapeutic…Rich-Mar Corp.1995—
−1K160992HPM-6000BTL Industries, Inc.2016—
0 (this device)K202031Talent-Pro Electromagnetic StimulatorRemed Co., Ltd.2021—
+1K251083Compact IIEnraf-Nonius, B.V.2025—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K202031, 1995–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IPF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IPF device

  1. #1 K241433 EVE Synergy (EVE-20M)score 19.6 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K160992HPM-6000
Summary page 4
…sical Medicine • Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.5850 • Regulatory Class: Class II • Product Code: IPF III. PREDICATE DEVICE HPM-6000 (K160992, Manufacturer: BTL Industries, Inc.) The predicate device has not been subject to a design-related recall. IV. DEVIC…
BTL Industries, Inc.2016—

Also cleared against K160992: 4 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K251083Compact IIEnraf-Nonius, B.V.20250

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 26 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 21.2 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K251083 (Enraf-Nonius, B.V., 2025) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K160992.

How does its category compare?

All IPF devices

IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2021, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IPF

3in 2025

2007: 82008: 62009: 72010: 42011: 42012: 42013: 102014: 42015: 32016: 72017: 52018: 52019: 42020: 92021: 152022: 72023: 92024: 72025: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 15 (2021) · low 3 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IPF

257in 2025

2007: 143 days median2008: 140 days median2009: 216 days median2010: 121 days median2011: 275 days median2012: 269 days median2013: 180 days median2014: 264 days median2015: 43 days median2016: 113 days median2017: 110 days median2018: 73 days median2019: 133 days median2020: 121 days median2021: 98 days median2022: 108 days median2023: 255 days median2024: 201 days median2025: 257 days median2026 (partial year): 206 days median
2007high 275 (2011) · low 43 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IPF

1in 2023

2008: 12011: 12012: 32023: 1
2007high 3 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IPF

8in 2025

2007: 112008: 2132009: 1502010: 142011: 252012: 162013: 62014: 192015: 112016: 82017: 22018: 32019: 102020: 132021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 52025: 8
2007high 213 (2008) · low 2 (2017)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IPF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20078143011
200861401213
200972160150
20104121014
20114275125
20124269316
20131018006
20144264019
2015343011
2016711308
2017511002
201857303
20194133010
20209121013
2021159803
2022710804
2023925518
2024720105
2025325708
202632060—

What is it indicated for?

The Talent-Pro™ Electromagnetic Stimulator is intended to be used under medical supervision for adjunctive therapy for the treatment of medical diseases and conditions.

The Talent-Pro™ Electromagnetic Stimulator is indicated for use in stimulating neuromuscular tissue for bulk muscle excitation in the legs or arms for rehabilitative purposes.

Indications for Use for Muscle Stimulators:

- Relaxation of muscle spasms

- Prevention or retardation of disuse atrophy

- Increasing local blood circulation

- Muscle re-education

- Immediate post-surgical stimulation of calf muscles to prevent venous thrombosis

- Maintaining or increasing range of motion

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K202031: Talent-Pro Electromagnetic Stimulator.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K202031

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026