510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

MELODY, Remote Control System for Ultrasound Probe

K161354510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 12, 2017392-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Adecho Tech · IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic

Cleared on Jun 12, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K082543 (Sonocine, Inc., 2008) after a 392-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1992. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jun 12, 2017
Review
392 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K922470 (1992). 11 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK922470 Ies, Image Enhancement SystemOpen Mri, Inc. · 1992
  2. 5 generations backK993802 Sharpview Image Enhancement SystemContext Vision AB · 2000
  3. 4 generations backK024028 Sharp View Image Enhancement SystemContext Vision AB · 2003
  4. 3 generations backK052355 Automated Breast Ultrasound System, Model AbusU-Systems, Inc. · 2005
  5. 2 generations backK070477 Orison Embrace SystemOrison Corporation · 2007
  6. 1 generation backK082543 Sonocine Adjunctive Breast Ultrasound System (Abu), Model 100Sonocine, Inc. · 2008
  7. This deviceK161354 MELODY, Remote Control System for Ultrasound ProbeAdecho Tech · 2017
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK260190 ArthurROPCA ApS · 2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K260190ArthurROPCA ApS · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K922470Ies, Image Enhancement SystemOpen Mri, Inc.1992—
−5K993802Sharpview Image Enhancement SystemContext Vision AB2000—
−4K024028Sharp View Image Enhancement SystemContext Vision AB2003—
−3K052355Automated Breast Ultrasound System, Model AbusU-Systems, Inc.2005—
−2K070477Orison Embrace SystemOrison Corporation2007—
−1K082543Sonocine Adjunctive Breast Ultrasound System (Abu), Model 100Sonocine, Inc.2008—
0 (this device)K161354MELODY, Remote Control System for Ultrasound ProbeAdecho Tech2017—
+1K260190ArthurROPCA ApS2026—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200020
200220
200310

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K161354, 1992–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYO device

  1. #1 K243937 Accuro 3Sscore 20.5 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K082543Sonocine Adjunctive Breast Ultrasound System (Abu), Model 100
Summary page 5
…3. IYN Review Panel: Radiology FDA Document Numbers Q150951 Related To Melody Predicate Device(s): K082543, SonoCiné Adjunctive Breast Ultrasound System (ABU), Model 100 III. PREDICATE DEVICE…
Sonocine, Inc.2008—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K260190ArthurROPCA ApS20260

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 25 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.0 years on median.
  • 2 of the 11 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K260190 (ROPCA ApS, 2026) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All IYO devices

IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IYO

7in 2025

2007: 202008: 142009: 132010: 152011: 112012: 152013: 172014: 142015: 192016: 102017: 192018: 142019: 132020: 112021: 152022: 52023: 112024: 102025: 72026 (partial year): 10
2007high 20 (2007) · low 5 (2022)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYO

171in 2025

2007: 17 days median2008: 36 days median2009: 79 days median2010: 113 days median2011: 69 days median2012: 68 days median2013: 50 days median2014: 63 days median2015: 46 days median2016: 36 days median2017: 72 days median2018: 56 days median2019: 59 days median2020: 57 days median2021: 64 days median2022: 190 days median2023: 177 days median2024: 220 days median2025: 171 days median2026 (partial year): 139 days median
2007high 220 (2024) · low 17 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYO

1in 2022

2007: 42008: 52009: 92010: 82012: 22013: 32014: 22015: 12018: 12019: 12021: 112022: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 11 (2021) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYO

485in 2025

2007: 392008: 202009: 272010: 202011: 582012: 782013: 4362014: 3042015: 2682016: 2542017: 2382018: 3682019: 5372020: 4982021: 6172022: 5112023: 5272024: 6402025: 485
2007high 640 (2024) · low 20 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072017439
20081436520
20091379927
201015113820
20111169058
20121568278
201317503436
201414632304
201519461268
201610360254
201719720238
201814561368
201913591537
202011570498
2021156411617
202251901511
2023111770527
2024102200640
202571710485
2026101391—

What is it indicated for?

The MELODY is intended to hold the external ultrasound transducer of cleared ultrasound equipment and provide a remotely-located, expert sonographer the ability to manipulate the transducer in real time through an Internet connection to obtain the ultrasound views required to assess the patient. The MELODY robot frame at the remotely-located patient is prepared and positioned by a trained assistant at the direction of the expert sonographer through a…

Read the full statement (121 words)

The MELODY is intended to hold the external ultrasound transducer of cleared ultrasound equipment and provide a remotely-located, expert sonographer the ability to manipulate the transducer in real time through an Internet connection to obtain the ultrasound views required to assess the patient. The MELODY robot frame at the remotely-located patient is prepared and positioned by a trained assistant at the direction of the expert sonographer through a suitable third-party videoconferencing system. Sonograms are transmitted from the patient location from cleared ultrasound equipment through digital telecommunication to the expert sonographer. Indications for the MELODY are tabulated in the Diagnostic Ultrasound Indications table. MELODY may also be used when a physician wants to have a colleague not on-site provide a second opinion.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K161354: MELODY, Remote Control System for Ultrasound Probe.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K161354

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026