510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Barrier Supreme Sterilization Wrapper

K162162510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 4, 201694-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.6850

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Standard Textile Co., Inc. · FRG Wrap, Sterilization

Cleared on Nov 4, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K923408 (Standard Textile Co., Inc., 1993) after a 94-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1993.

Decided
Nov 4, 2016
Review
94 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FRG
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K923408 (1993). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K923408 · Wrappel T · Standard Textile Co., Inc. · 1993199019952000200520102015
K923408 · Wrappel T · Standard Textile Co., Inc. · 19930
  1. Root · 1 generation backK923408 Wrappel TStandard Textile Co., Inc. · 1993
  2. This deviceK162162 Barrier Supreme Sterilization WrapperStandard Textile Co., Inc. · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K923408Wrappel TStandard Textile Co., Inc.1993—
0 (this device)K162162Barrier Supreme Sterilization WrapperStandard Textile Co., Inc.2016—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K162162, 1993–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FRG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FRG device

  1. #1 K234050 HALYARD® ONE-STEP® Sterilization Wrap…score 15.8 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K923408Wrappel T
Summary page 5
…cu.ft. Substantial Equivalence Comparison Barrier Supreme Sterilization Wrappers have been shown to be “substantially equivalent” to WrapPel “T” sterilization wraps K923408. All fabrics used are woven, dyed and treated with a fluoropolymer finish. Fabrics are spread, cut and sewn into the similar…
Standard Textile Co., Inc.1993—

Also cleared against K923408: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K923408.

How does its category compare?

All FRG devices

FRG Wrap, Sterilization: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FRG

9in 2025

2007: 32008: 22009: 42010: 42011: 62012: 102013: 62014: 82015: 122016: 92017: 92018: 52019: 92020: 52021: 42022: 92023: 92024: 112025: 92026 (partial year): 4
2007high 12 (2015) · low 2 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FRG

151in 2025

2007: 182 days median2009: 171 days median2010: 213 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 133 days median2013: 146 days median2014: 177 days median2015: 196 days median2016: 131 days median2017: 260 days median2018: 150 days median2019: 258 days median2020: 122 days median2021: 170 days median2022: 217 days median2023: 230 days median2024: 182 days median2025: 151 days median2026 (partial year): 247 days median
2007high 260 (2017) · low 110 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FRG

2in 2022

2013: 22017: 292020: 142022: 2
2007high 29 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FRG

18in 2025

2007: 12008: 22009: 22011: 122012: 42013: 52014: 132015: 92016: 202017: 72018: 222019: 102020: 212021: 92022: 42023: 132024: 212025: 18
2007high 22 (2018) · low 0 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FRG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007318201
20082—02
2009417102
2010421300
20116110012
20121013304
2013614625
20148177013
20151219609
20169131020
20179260297
20185150022
20199258010
202051221421
2021417009
2022921724
20239230013
202411182021
20259151018
202642470—

What is it indicated for?

Barrier Supreme Sterilization Wrappers are intended to be used to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a health care provider. They are intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed medical device and also to maintain sterility of the enclosed device until used. Barrier Supreme Sterilization Wrappers will function as a sterilization wrap when processed according to instructions. Barrier Supreme Sterilization Wrappers are reusable…

Read the full statement (212 words)

Barrier Supreme Sterilization Wrappers are intended to be used to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a health care provider. They are intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed medical device and also to maintain sterility of the enclosed device until used.

Barrier Supreme Sterilization Wrappers will function as a sterilization wrap when processed according to instructions. Barrier Supreme Sterilization Wrappers are reusable through 75 wash, dry, and sterilization cycles. They are manufactured and distributed as non-sterile sterilization wraps that are intended to be sterilized and processed by health care facilities and/or contract sterilization/laundry companies.

Pack Assembly:

Pack assembly should follow established folding, assembly and wrapping procedures as defined by the clinical staff for aseptic presentation of the pack and its contents. The oblong and envelope folds have been validated for use on textile packs. Closure can include autoclave tape and elastomer closures.

Sterilization:

A prevacuum steam sterilization cycle (4 minute exposure at 270oF) has been validated for use on textile packs. The maximum pack size validated for use was 0.58 cubic feet with a pack weight of 23.2 pounds – pack density of 40.0 lbs./cu.ft. The maximum chamber loading configuration included 96 pounds of packs in a 9.1 cubic foot chamber – load density of 10.6 lbs./cu.ft.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K162162: Barrier Supreme Sterilization Wrapper.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K162162

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026