510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2019PowerFlow Apheresis I.V. Port
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
C.R. Bard, Inc. · PTD Subcutaneous Implanted Apheresis Port
Cleared on Apr 17, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K926139 (Bard Access Systems, Inc., 1995) after a 171-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995. 2 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.
- Decided
- Apr 17, 2017
- Review
- 171 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- PTD
- Recalls
- 1
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K926139 (1995). 2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.
- Root · 1 generation backK926139 Cathlink 20 Titanium Port W/Att. Polyurethane CathBard Access Systems, Inc. · 1995
- This deviceK163001 PowerFlow Apheresis I.V. PortC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2017
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK192291 TidalPort-AP Implantable Apheresis Vascular Access PortNorfolk Medical Products, Inc. · 2020
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK191143 PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV PortC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2019
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K926139 | Cathlink 20 Titanium Port W/Att. Polyurethane Cath | Bard Access Systems, Inc. | 1995 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K163001 | PowerFlow Apheresis I.V. Port | C.R. Bard, Inc. | 2017 | — |
| +1 | K192291 | TidalPort-AP Implantable Apheresis Vascular Access Port | Norfolk Medical Products, Inc. | 2020 | — |
| +1 | K191143 | PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV Port | C.R. Bard, Inc. | 2019 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in PTD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new PTD device
- #1 K192291 TidalPort-AP Implantable Apheresis Vascular…score 3.5 · 13 generations · no Class I recall
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K926139 | Cathlink 20 Titanium Port W/Att. Polyurethane CathSummary page 4…Titanium Port with Attachable Polyurethane Catheter Classification Name: Subcutaneous, Implanted, Intravascular Infusion Port and Catheter Premarket Notification: K926139 Manufacturer: Bard Access Systems, Inc. This predicate has not been subject to a design-related recall. === Page 5… | 1995 |
| † | K041088 | Trifusion, Model 0609190/0659350 | 2004 |
| † | K072215 | Titanium Powerport Isp Implanted Port | 2007 |
What descends from it? (2)
2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2019 | Class II | Z-1579-2020 | Component change control | Firm has identified that the product may be at risk of incorrectly containing a tunneler with a barb tip meant to attach to a 6Fr catheter instead of the correct barb tip for a 9.6Fr catheter. This can result in a prolongation of operation. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All PTD devicesPTD Subcutaneous Implanted Apheresis Port: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · PTD
1in 2020
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · PTD
Too few PTD 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · PTD
No recall names PTD since 2007.
Adverse event reports per year · PTD
26in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code PTD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 15 |
| 2019 | 1 | — | 0 | 35 |
| 2020 | 1 | — | 0 | 18 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 15 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 11 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 25 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 22 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 26 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Bard PowerFlow™ Implantable Apheresis IV Port is indicated for patient therapies requiring repeated access to the vascular system. The port system can be used for long-term therapeutic apheresis, withdrawal of blood, and infusion of medications, I.V. fluids, parenteral nutrition solutions, blood and blood products.
The Bard PowerFlow™ Implantable Apheresis IV Port is indicated for power injection of contrast media. For power injection of contrast media, the maximum recommended infusion rate is 5 mL/s.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K163001 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K163001: PowerFlow Apheresis I.V. Port.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K163001
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026