510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV Port

K191143510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 2, 201994-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5965

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

C.R. Bard, Inc. · PTD Subcutaneous Implanted Apheresis Port

Cleared on Aug 2, 2019 as substantially equivalent to K163001 (C.R. Bard, Inc., 2017) after a 94-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1995.

Decided
Aug 2, 2019
Review
94 days
Class
Class II
Product code
PTD
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K926139 (1995). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK926139 Cathlink 20 Titanium Port W/Att. Polyurethane CathBard Access Systems, Inc. · 1995
  2. 1 generation backK163001 PowerFlow Apheresis I.V. PortC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2017 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK191143 PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV PortC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2019
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K926139Cathlink 20 Titanium Port W/Att. Polyurethane CathBard Access Systems, Inc.1995—
−1K163001PowerFlow Apheresis I.V. PortC.R. Bard, Inc.20171
0 (this device)K191143PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV PortC.R. Bard, Inc.2019—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K191143, 1995–2019Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in PTD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new PTD device

  1. #1 K192291 TidalPort-AP Implantable Apheresis Vascular…score 3.5 · 13 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K163001PowerFlow Apheresis I.V. Port
Summary page 4
…Classification Name: Subcutaneous, implanted, intravascular infusion port and catheter Premarket Notification: K163001 Regulatory Class: Class 2 Product Code: PTD Regulation Number: 21 CFR §880.…
C.R. Bard, Inc.20171

Also cleared against K163001: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 24 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 22.3 years on median.
  • 1 of the 2 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K163001.

How does its category compare?

All PTD devices

PTD Subcutaneous Implanted Apheresis Port: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2019, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · PTD

1in 2020

2017: 12019: 12020: 1
2007high 1 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · PTD

Too few PTD 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · PTD

No recall names PTD since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · PTD

26in 2025

2017: 42018: 152019: 352020: 182021: 152022: 112023: 252024: 222025: 26
2007high 35 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code PTD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20171—04
20180—015
20191—035
20201—018
20210—015
20220—011
20230—025
20240—022
20250—026
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Bard PowerFlow™ Implantable Apheresis IV Port is indicated for patient therapies requiring repeated access to the vascular system. The port system can be used for long-term therapeutic apheresis, withdrawal of blood, and infusion of medications, IV fluids, parenteral nutrition solutions, blood and blood products.

The Bard PowerFlow™ Implantable Apheresis IV Port is indicated for power injection of contrast media. For power injection of contrast media, the maximum recommended infusion rate is 5 mL/s.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K191143: PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV Port.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K191143

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026