510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

SuperGrow 272, Ultimate 272

K172982510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 19, 201783-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.5500

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Super Grow Lasers · OAP Laser, Comb, Hair

Cleared on Dec 19, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K163170 (Capillus, LLC, 2017) after an 83-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 2007. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Dec 19, 2017
Review
83 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OAP
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K060305 (2007). 9 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 5 generations backK060305 Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC · 2007
  2. 4 generations backK093499 Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC · 2009
  3. 3 generations backK103368 Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC · 2011
  4. 2 generations backK142573 HairMax LaserComb, HairMax LaserCombLexington International, LLC · 2014
  5. 1 generation backK163170 Capillus 82, Capillus 202, Capillus 272 Pro, 272 Office Pro…Capillus, LLC · 2017
  6. This deviceK172982 SuperGrow 272, Ultimate 272Super Grow Lasers · 2017
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK181308 SuperGrow 272, Ultimate 272Super Grow Lasers · 2018

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K181308SuperGrow 272, Ultimate 272Super Grow Lasers · 2018 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K060305Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC2007—
−4K093499Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC2009—
−3K103368Hairmax LasercombLexington International, LLC2011—
−2K142573HairMax LaserComb, HairMax LaserCombLexington International, LLC2014—
−1K163170Capillus 82, Capillus 202, Capillus 272 Pro, 272 Office Pro, Capillus 302…Capillus, LLC2017—
0 (this device)K172982SuperGrow 272, Ultimate 272Super Grow Lasers2017—
+1K181308SuperGrow 272, Ultimate 272Super Grow Lasers2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201210
201420

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K172982, 2007–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OAP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OAP device

  1. #1 K222790 F65 Laser Systemscore 20.5 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K163170Capillus 82, Capillus 202, Capillus 272 Pro, 272 Office Pro, Capillus 302, Capillus 312…
Summary page 5
…Ultimate 272 are substantially equivalent to the following predicates: 510(k) Number Predicate Device Name / Manufacturer Primary Predicate K163170 Capillus272Pro, Capillus 272 OfficePro / Capillus, LLC.  SUMMARY OF NON‐CLINICAL TESTING No FDA performance sta…
Capillus, LLC2017—

Also cleared against K163170: 12 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K181308SuperGrow 272, Ultimate 272Super Grow Lasers20180

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 10 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.2 years on median.
  • None of the 9 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K181308 (Super Grow Lasers, 2018) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 12 other devices also cite its predicate K163170.

How does its category compare?

All OAP devices

OAP Laser, Comb, Hair: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OAP

6in 2025

2007: 12009: 12010: 12011: 42012: 22013: 32014: 32015: 82016: 82017: 52018: 152019: 92020: 92021: 52022: 82023: 82024: 102025: 62026 (partial year): 9
2007high 15 (2018) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OAP

87in 2025

2011: 89 days median2013: 262 days median2014: 80 days median2015: 126 days median2016: 83 days median2017: 83 days median2018: 87 days median2019: 89 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 89 days median2022: 99 days median2023: 81 days median2024: 94 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 83 days median
2007high 262 (2013) · low 80 (2014)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OAP

No recall names OAP since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · OAP

11in 2025

2011: 12013: 12015: 22016: 12017: 12018: 12019: 42021: 32022: 22024: 12025: 11
2007high 11 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OAP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20091—00
20101—00
201148901
20122—00
2013326201
201438000
2015812602
201688301
201758301
2018158701
201998904
202098800
202158903
202289902
202388100
2024109401
2025687011
20269830—

What is it indicated for?

The SuperGrow 272 laser hat and the Ultimate 272 are intended to treat Androgenetic Alopecia and promote hair growth in males who have Norwood – Hamilton Classifications of IIa to V patterns of hair loss and to treat Androgenetic Alopecia and promote hair growth in females who have Ludwig (Savin) Scale I-1 to I-4, II-1, II-2, or frontal; both with Fitzpatrick Skin Types I to IV.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K172982: SuperGrow 272, Ultimate 272.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K172982

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026