510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Reliance Lumber IBF System

K180687510(k) SpecialCleared May 15, 201861-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Reliance Medical Systems · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on May 15, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K113540 (Reliance Medical Systems, LLC, 2012) and 4 other predicates after a 61-day review. Its family tree reaches back 13 generations to 1984. 8 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 15, 2018
Review
61 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
5

Its longest line of descent runs back 13 generations to K841189 (1984). 34 ancestors in all. 8 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 13 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 9 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK102313 Patriot Transcontinental M SpacersGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2010
  4. 2 generations backK160463 Reliance Lumbar IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC · 2016
  5. 1 generation backK173283 Reliance Lumbar IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC · 2018
  6. This deviceK180687 Reliance Lumber IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems · 2018
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 7 of its ownK183049 Reliance Lumbar IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC · 2019
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 6 of its ownK212930 LumiVy Lumbar IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2022
  9. Descendant · 3 generations on · 5 of its ownK223412 LumiVy™ Lumbar IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2023
  10. Descendant · 4 generations on · 3 of its ownK230414 ClariVy™ Cervical IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2023
  11. Descendant · 5 generations on · 2 of its ownK231836 ClariVy™ Cervical IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2023
Show all 13 generations
  1. Root · 13 generations backK841189 Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc. · 1984
  2. 12 generations backK990148 Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed · 1999
  3. 11 generations backK003043 Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2001
  4. 10 generations backK020522 Modification to Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed · 2002
  5. 9 generations backK030833 Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed · 2003
  6. 8 generations backK031635 Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed · 2003
  7. 7 generations backK041722 Modification to VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2004
  8. 6 generations backK052746 Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2005
  9. 5 generations backK090899 Depuy Spine Lateral SystemDepuy Spine, Inc. · 2009
  10. 4 generations backK093242 Patriot Transcontinental Llif SpacerGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2009
  11. 3 generations backK102313 Patriot Transcontinental M SpacersGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2010
  12. 2 generations backK160463 Reliance Lumbar IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC · 2016
  13. 1 generation backK173283 Reliance Lumbar IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC · 2018
  14. This deviceK180687 Reliance Lumber IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems · 2018

Showing 5 of 8 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2019: 12022: 12023: 32024: 12025: 12026: 1
2019high 3 (2023) · low 0 (2020)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 8 · See all
  • K183049Reliance Lumbar IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC · 2019 · cites it directly7descendants
  • K212930LumiVy Lumbar IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2022 · 2 generations on6descendants
  • K223412LumiVy™ Lumbar IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2023 · 3 generations on5descendants
  • K230414ClariVy™ Cervical IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2023 · 4 generations on3descendants
  • K231836ClariVy™ Cervical IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC · 2023 · 5 generations on2descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−13K841189Oec/Rezaian Spinal FixatorOrthopedic Equipment Co., Inc.1984—
−12K990148Stackable Cage SystemDepuy Motech Acromed1999—
−11K003043Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2001—
−10K020522Modification to Surgical Titanium Mesh SystemDepuyacromed2002—
−9K030833Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed2003—
−8K031635Depuy Acromed VBR SystemDepuyacromed2003—
−7K041722Modification to VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2004—
−6K052746Concorde VBR Spinal SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2005—
−5K090899Depuy Spine Lateral SystemDepuy Spine, Inc.2009—
−4K093242Patriot Transcontinental Llif SpacerGlobus Medical, Inc.2009—
−3K102313Patriot Transcontinental M SpacersGlobus Medical, Inc.2010—
−2K160463Reliance Lumbar IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC2016—
−1K173283Reliance Lumbar IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC2018—
0 (this device)K180687Reliance Lumber IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems2018—
+1K183049Reliance Lumbar IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC2019—
+2K212930LumiVy Lumbar IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC2022—
+3K223412LumiVy™ Lumbar IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC2023—
+4K230414ClariVy™ Cervical IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC2023—
+5K231836ClariVy™ Cervical IBF SystemVy Spine, LLC2023—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199620
199910
200010
200130
200210
200310
200740
200850
200920
201210

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201910
202210
202330
202410
202510
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K180687, 1984–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (5)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K113540Reliance Lumbar Ibf System
Summary page 4
…05/09/2018 Substantial Equivalence The Reliance Lumbar IBF is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed, primary predicate device, Reliance Lumbar IBF System (K113540, K160463 & K173283). The subject devices have same size & configurations as the predicate devices. Subject devices differ in term…
Reliance Medical Systems, LLC2012—
*K160463Reliance Lumbar IBF System
Summary page 4
…2018 Substantial Equivalence The Reliance Lumbar IBF is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed, primary predicate device, Reliance Lumbar IBF System (K113540, K160463 & K173283). The subject devices have same size & configurations as the predicate devices. Subject devices differ in terms of mate…
Reliance Medical Systems, LLC2016—
*K173283Reliance Lumbar IBF System
Summary page 4
…tantial Equivalence The Reliance Lumbar IBF is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed, primary predicate device, Reliance Lumbar IBF System (K113540, K160463 & K173283). The subject devices have same size & configurations as the predicate devices. Subject devices differ in terms of material used…
Reliance Medical Systems, LLC2018—
*K093242Patriot Transcontinental Llif Spacer
Summary page 4
…aterial used and method of sterilization. It’s also substantially equivalent to the legally marketed, secondary predicate device, Globus Patriot TransContinental System (K093242, K102313).The Reliance Lumbar IBF is equivalent to these commercially available devices in terms of material, intended use, level…
Globus Medical, Inc.2009—
*K102313Patriot Transcontinental M Spacers
Summary page 4
…sed and method of sterilization. It’s also substantially equivalent to the legally marketed, secondary predicate device, Globus Patriot TransContinental System (K093242, K102313).The Reliance Lumbar IBF is equivalent to these commercially available devices in terms of material, intended use, levels of atta…
Globus Medical, Inc.2010—

Also cleared against K113540: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (8)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K183049Reliance Lumbar IBF SystemReliance Medical Systems, LLC20197

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 34 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.1 years on median.
  • 2 of the 34 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K183049 (Reliance Medical Systems, LLC, 2019) has gone furthest, with 7 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K113540.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The Reliance LUMBAR IBF System is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients. The device systems are designed for use with autogenous bone graft to facilitate fusion. One device may be used per intervertebral space. The implants are intended to be used with legally cleared supplemental spinal fixation cleared for the implanted level. The Reliance LUMBAR IBF System, when used as an Intervertebral Body Fusion device…

Read the full statement (143 words)

The Reliance LUMBAR IBF System is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients. The device systems are designed for use with autogenous bone graft to facilitate fusion. One device may be used per intervertebral space. The implants are intended to be used with legally cleared supplemental spinal fixation cleared for the implanted level.

The Reliance LUMBAR IBF System, when used as an Intervertebral Body Fusion device is also intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels int he lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K180687: Reliance Lumber IBF System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K180687

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026