510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Park Blade Septostomy Catheter

K182399510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 4, 2019212-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.5175

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cook Incorporated · DXF Catheter, Septostomy

Cleared on Apr 4, 2019 as substantially equivalent to K801031 (Cook, Inc., 1980) after a 212-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1980.

Decided
Apr 4, 2019
Review
212 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DXF
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K801031 (1980). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K801031 · Blade Septostomy Catheter · Cook, Inc. · 198019801990200020102020
K801031 · Blade Septostomy Catheter · Cook, Inc. · 19800
  1. Root · 1 generation backK801031 Blade Septostomy CatheterCook, Inc. · 1980
  2. This deviceK182399 Park Blade Septostomy CatheterCook Incorporated · 2019
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K801031Blade Septostomy CatheterCook, Inc.1980—
0 (this device)K182399Park Blade Septostomy CatheterCook Incorporated2019—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K182399, 1980–2019Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DXF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DXF device

  1. #1 K242076 VersaCross™ RF Wirescore 14.9 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K801031Blade Septostomy Catheter
Summary page 4
…ction with a transseptal technique. Predicate Device: The predicate device, the Blade Septostomy Catheter, was cleared for commercial distribution under 510(k) number K801031, on July 28, 1980. Comparison to Predicate Device: It has been demonstrated that the Park Blade Septostomy Catheter is identi…
Cook, Inc.1980—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.

How does its category compare?

All DXF devices

DXF Catheter, Septostomy: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2019, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DXF

2in 2025

2008: 12015: 12019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 42025: 22026 (partial year): 3
2007high 4 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DXF

83in 2024

2024: 83 days median2026 (partial year): 30 days median
2007high 83 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DXF

3in 2020

2016: 12020: 3, 3 Class I
2007high 3 (2020) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (3 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DXF

682in 2025

2007: 22008: 82009: 32010: 42011: 62012: 22013: 12014: 42015: 212016: 132017: 132018: 362019: 242020: 552021: 392022: 702023: 2862024: 3682025: 682
2007high 682 (2025) · low 1 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DXF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—02
20081—08
20090—03
20100—04
20110—06
20120—02
20130—01
20140—04
20151—021
20160—113
20170—013
20180—036
20191—024
20200—3 (3)55
20211—039
20221—070
20231—0286
20244830368
20252—0682
20263300—

What is it indicated for?

The Park Blade Septostomy Catheter is intended to enlarge interatrial openings. The device can also be used when balloon atrial septostomy is insufficient or unsuccessful, particularly in older infants and children with a thickened atrial septum. Normally, the existing interatrial opening is used for this procedure. However, if the interatrial septum is intact, the procedure can be performed in conjunction with a transseptal technique.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K182399: Park Blade Septostomy Catheter.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K182399

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026