510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Qraypen

K183121510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 18, 2019251-day reviewClass I21 CFR 872.6640

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

AIOBIO Co., Ltd. · EIA Unit, Operative Dental

Cleared on Jul 18, 2019 as substantially equivalent to K963778 (Schick Technologies, Inc., 1996) after a 251-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1996.

Decided
Jul 18, 2019
Review
251 days
Class
Class I
Product code
EIA
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K963778 (1996). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K963778 · CDR-Cam · Schick Technologies, Inc. · 1996199520002005201020152020
K963778 · CDR-Cam · Schick Technologies, Inc. · 19960
  1. Root · 1 generation backK963778 CDR-CamSchick Technologies, Inc. · 1996
  2. This deviceK183121 QraypenAIOBIO Co., Ltd. · 2019
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K963778CDR-CamSchick Technologies, Inc.1996—
0 (this device)K183121QraypenAIOBIO Co., Ltd.2019—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K183121, 1996–2019Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EIA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EIA device

  1. #1 K231845 Dental unit Model: Marescore 14.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K963778CDR-Cam
Summary page 4
…y Equivalent Device Device Name 510(k) Number CDR-CAM (SCHICK TECHNOLOGIES, INC) K963778 Page 1 of 6 510(k) Summary - K183121…
Schick Technologies, Inc.1996—

Also cleared against K963778: 4 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K963778.

How does its category compare?

All EIA devices

EIA Unit, Operative Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2019, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · EIA

7in 2025

2007: 32008: 62009: 32010: 32011: 52012: 22013: 22014: 22015: 72016: 42017: 12018: 22019: 22020: 12022: 32023: 32024: 32025: 72026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2015) · low 0 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EIA

178in 2025

2007: 90 days median2008: 72 days median2009: 109 days median2010: 270 days median2011: 150 days median2015: 214 days median2016: 182 days median2022: 265 days median2023: 686 days median2024: 251 days median2025: 178 days median
2007high 686 (2023) · low 72 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EIA

1in 2013

2012: 12013: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EIA

47in 2025

2010: 22011: 32012: 72013: 62014: 2552015: 4522016: 1512017: 642018: 732019: 682020: 482021: 492022: 442023: 532024: 532025: 47
2007high 452 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EIA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200739000
200867200
2009310900
2010327002
2011515003
20122—17
20132—16
20142—0255
201572140452
201641820151
20171—064
20182—073
20192—068
20201—048
20210—049
20223265044
20233686053
20243251053
20257178047
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

Qraypen is to be used as an intraoral video source and is indicated for individuals who may benefit from the addition of video images in intraoral dental examinations.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K183121: Qraypen.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K183121

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026